#134288 by fisherman bob
Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:57 am
Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:57 am
Instead of our federal government mandating that everybody pays for the NEA through taxes wouldn't it make more sense if we could VOLUNTARILY pay for it by individual or corporate tax deductible donations? I understand it's important to support the arts, but what is considered art is a matter of SUBJECTIVE opinion. I'll bet that if there was an option on every tax return where people could volunteer a tax deductible donation they would actually collect more money for the NEA. Some of the "art" exhibits that have been supported by the NEA don't qualify as art IMO. For example a cross soaking in urine (that was in a museum somewhere believe it or not) isn't art. I don't want my tax dollars going to the NEA. I DO want my tax dollars going to keep up infrastructure, taking care of our troops, the military, and what protects us. Art and music is subjective. If you're a struggling artist there's probably a good reason for it. People aren't BUYING it and/or you are not marketing it properly. You shouldn't be bailed out by tax dollars if your "art" isn't redeeming enough that people aren't buying it. As far as supporting art & music in our schools that should be a local and state matter. I believe that art and music education strengthens the learning process, especially mathematics, but it's NOT the job of the federal government to make that decision. The recent elections showed that the majority of Americans want the governement to get leaner and meaner. One place to start is the NEA.






