This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#105696 by CraigMaxim
Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:23 pm
jimmydanger wrote:
Buckley was a dumbass...



A "dumbass" who authored more than 50 books, founded the magazine National Review, hosted countless episodes of the award winning "Firing Line" and was considered one of America's greatest intellectuals of his generation.

Really, is this kind of irrationality what liberalism does for people?

#105699 by philbymon
Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:57 pm
Gee, does writing books make you smart?

While I'll agree that Buckley was no slouch in the brains dept., that doesn't mean he was always right, either. At least he could speak without his emotions coloring everything he said, though.

#106157 by CraigMaxim
Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:33 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/business/media/05carr.html


The New York Times
The Media Equation
How Palin Became a Brand
By DAVID CARR
April 4, 2010


When Sarah Palin made her debut as the host of “Real American Stories” on Fox News on Thursday night, she described several triumphs of regular people over insurmountable odds, but she missed an obvious one: her own.

After her failed bid for the vice presidency, she was more or less told to head back to Alaska to serve out her term as governor — a kind of metaphorical kitchen.

Instead, she quit her day job and proceeded to become a one-woman national media empire, with the ratings and lucre to show for it.

Image

With its tales of uplift and pluck, “Real American Stories” trades in the kind of easy sentimentality that provokes eye rolls among those of us who work in media while quickening the pulse and patriotic ardor of almost everyone else. At the beginning of the show, Ms. Palin promised that it would “reaffirm our pioneering spirit and unmatched generosity, here and around the world.”

And so it did, with two million people tuning in. It featured a young man with cerebral palsy who was inspired to walk by the love of a dog, a millionaire who financed the college educations of legions of underprivileged youngsters, and a soldier who died to save his brothers in arms. (LL Cool J’s interview was withdrawn after he complained that it was going to be used in Ms. Palin’s show, proving that not everyone was in the reaffirming mood.)

“It’s not the kind of thing that’s going to excite you guys on the East Coast, but everyone else is dying to hear stories like these,” said one of her representatives who was not authorized to speak on the record but was authorized to slam the East Coast.

Ms. Palin’s politics can border on the atavistic, but beyond her Tea Party theatrics, she has tunneled her own route into the public consciousness and gone into the Sarah Palin Across America business. And what a business it is.

Image

She was paid a $1.25 million retainer by HarperCollins. Her book, “Going Rogue,” has sold 2.2 million copies, according to its publisher, and she has another tentatively scheduled for this fall.

She now has an actual television career, including appearances as a pundit on Fox News, her gig as the host of “Real American Stories” four times a year, and a coming eight-part series on TLC called “Sarah Palin’s Alaska,” which will cost, according to some media reports, $1 million an episode (a lot more than governors make for “Come visit!” P.S.A.’s).

Other people have crossed the border from politics to media to very good effect — George Stephanopoulos, Patrick Buchanan and Chris Matthews, to name a few — but the transition was far more gradual. Ms. Palin turned on a dime and was a ratings sensation from the word go: her first paid appearance, as a commentator on “The O’Reilly Factor” on Jan. 12, was good for an extra million viewers.

Her appeal doesn’t stop at the red states. When Ms. Palin stopped by to chat with Oprah Winfrey — not exactly friendly territory — the show achieved its biggest ratings in two years.

Ms. Palin didn’t go on the show to run for president as much as to become the next Oprah. And it seems to be working.

So what are the rest of us missing?

Back in September 2008, when she was unveiled in St. Paul during the Republican convention, a longtime political reporter told me that her appeal would burn off over time. I wondered about that. I’m from Minnesota, which is sometimes considered the southernmost tip of Alaska, and her way of speaking in credulous golly-gee may have been off-putting to some, but there is a kind of authenticity there that no image handler could conjure.

In Ms. Palin’s America, everyone’s got bootstraps; they just need to have the gumption to find them. And her version is full of plain old folks spending a lot of time overcoming a great deal, including a government that she posits usually intends to do them harm. “America is exceptional! It’s not her politicians that make her so; it’s her everyday people and the values Americans hold so dear,” she said on her Facebook page, which, by the way, has 1.5 million fans.

She’s also imported the political trick of coming from the outside and ruling from the center. When she sets down the ear piece and leaves the studio lights, even the way she says the word “media” in her speeches — “MEE-dee-uh” — makes it sound like something yucky and foul, a swamp to be avoided at all costs. Unless, of course, you are promoting a show, a book or a cause.

Many observers thought her unwillingness to serve out her term would be fatal to her ambitions, but the fact that governance did not suit her — she resigned as governor back in July — has become a kind of credential.

Ms. Palin still gets a session in the media spanking machine every time she does anything, but the disapproval seems to further cement the support of her loyalists. Ms. Palin may or may not be qualified to represent America around the world, but she certainly represents vast swaths of the American public and has a lucrative new career to show for it.

If we don’t see why, then maybe we deserve the “lamestream media” label she likes to give us.

Image

During the 2008 campaign, she was accused by the staff of Senator John McCain of running her own show and going off message. Then she took their disregard and made a book title out of it. “Going Rogue” is just one more example of how her inability or unwillingness to connect with the establishment leaders gives her credibility elsewhere. That’s a skill that works every bit as well on television as on the stump.

Image

Last week, she returned to Senator McCain’s side to help in his re-election bid. As she bounded across the stage in Arizona and Cindy McCain struggled to maintain her frozen smile, even people who can’t stand her politics must have laughed.

#106166 by Chippy
Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:29 am
coooooooo

#106169 by philbymon
Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:41 pm
“It’s not the kind of thing that’s going to excite you guys on the East Coast, but everyone else is dying to hear stories like these,” said one of her representatives who was not authorized to speak on the record but was authorized to slam the East Coast.

I just knew that, if Palin was involved, someone would have to be insulted!

I realize that she didn't say it, before you judge me on that, but it seems that the never-ending insults & negativity surround every part of her being, whether thay're from Palin, herself, or her entourage & supporters. Because of this, I find her impossible to tolerate, let alone admire or even like.

She embodies all that's wrong to me, but I guess someone is bound to say that it's because I live in the east...

:lol:

#106171 by jimmydanger
Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:51 pm
Then what's my excuse Phil, I live in the north midwest. Too much liberal education and media I suppose.

#106174 by philbymon
Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:55 pm
Yeah, jimmy. I think we need to move to red states to be "de-educated" or something...although I wonder who would influence the other more.

#106197 by Dewy
Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm
I think Palin has a lot in common with Wrestling.

Both have a lot of entertainment value, while neither are very serious.
Both have large devoted fan bases... some are intelligent, but not most.
Both are Drama-ful... a word I made up explaining to my daughter how Sit-Drama's take problems and blow them out of proportion to maximize the dramatic effect.
Both sell sex while swearing they are about something "more wholesome... wink, wink".
Both want you to come to their next rally. Nothing is really going to happen, its all scripted, and will happen at the next rally as well.
Both think you are Amazing Ordinary Folk, please attend all scheduled events, tune in to all broadcasts and take no guff from those non-believers.

Did I forget they are both capitalist opportunities for someone, and leaving poorer, stupider people in their wake?

#106198 by philbymon
Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:09 pm
Great analogy, Dewy!

#108280 by CraigMaxim
Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:37 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/17/AR2010041703546.html?hpid=sec-politics

Palin taken aback by Obama 'superpower' remark
By CHRISTOPHER WILLS
The Associated Press
Sunday, April 18, 2010


WASHINGTON, Ill. -- Sarah Palin criticized President Barack Obama on Saturday for saying America is a military superpower "whether we like it or not," saying she was taken aback by his comment.

Image

Former U.S. vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin smiles
as she heads to a dinning hall in Hamilton, Canada on
Thursday April 15, 2010. Palin brought her neo-con star
power to Canada for a $200-a-plate fundraiser Thursday
that drew both fans of the former U.S. vice-presidential
candidate and the undecided.
(AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Sheryl Nadler)


"I would hope that our leaders in Washington, D.C., understand we like to be a dominant superpower," the former Alaska governor said. "I don't understand a world view where we have to question whether we like it or not that America is powerful."

Obama said earlier this week that the United States must do its best to resolve conflicts around the world before they grow too serious.

"It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce these conflicts because whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another we get pulled into them," Obama said. "And that ends up costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure."

Palin's remarks came in a question-and-answer session after a speech at an event in the central Illinois town of Washington to raise money for scholarships and a community center. She spoke to a crowd of about 1,100.

The Republican criticized Obama throughout her speech - for a healthcare overhaul that she says won't work, for the increase in the national deficit and for disagreeing with Israeli policies.

Palin said she hopes the November elections will produce winners who believe in limited government and encouraging free enterprise.

She also poked fun at the controversy over the requirements listed in a contract for her speech at a California university. Palin thanked the organizers of Saturday's event for providing a straw for her water bottle - "the bent kind, which I just read in the media that I supposedly insist upon."

#108300 by philbymon
Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:10 pm
Man, she's sure got some good eyes! I can't see HALF the nits she picks at!

#108302 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:24 pm
Dewy you are just a spark gonna start a big fire. I'm glad you voted for all the crap that is going on now.
You think you got it all together but you allready stated your main position ,,,
Most people are a holes and they would better off dead. That is basically what you said. You got the balls to back down from that one,or ,,,
I know you,,,,
You are just gonna start a tirade of personal attacks on me.

Notice I did not do that to you. But go ahead ,,,U 2 FUNNY. My skin is thick

LOVE GLEN.

#108318 by CraigMaxim
Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:24 pm
philbymon wrote:Man, she's sure got some good eyes! I can't see HALF the nits she picks at!



I told my wife what Obama said, and she looked shocked... dropped her jaw, and just started shaking her head!

Is my wife blind too Phil?

These are ANTI-AMERICAN attitudes Phil. Paint them anyway you want, but MOST AMERICANS - PROUD AMERICANS - Are proud of our military status in the world!

#108378 by philbymon
Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:24 pm
Oh, for crying out loud, Craig!

"Whether we like it or not," refers to the responsibilities of being that superpower. There are times we the ppl don't want to get involved, but our leaders choose to do so anyway, because they believe it to be our responsibility to do so, simply because we're one of the few that CAN take action.

Get off it, already! BFD he made a statement meant to explain to those who would oppose taking action to do what he perceives to be our duty.

Ppl that take a phrase out of context are just looking to take pot-shots, Craig, & Palin's the Grand Master of the tactic. I can't believe that you are so naive as to take offense to this, but, being the Palin-lover you seem to be, I guess it shouldn't surprize me.

So, yes, imho, your wife is blind, too, cuz there was nothing anti-American about the statement, & if you'd take your blinders off, you'd see that, too.

#108404 by CraigMaxim
Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:28 am



I don't agree Phil.

Sorry.



- Get the whole context.

- Consider it in terms of the President's ultra-liberal history.

- Consider it in terms of his constant apologizing to other countries... his bowing to Muslim heads of state, while his wife pats the back of the Queen of England! :shock:

- Consider it in terms of his wife's statement of being proud of her country "For the first time in my life"


It was not ONE statement, but several, that are revealing...

"Whether we like it or not..." (it sucks)

"We REMAIN a dominant military superpower" (that sucks right?)

"...when conflicts break out, one way or another we get pulled into them"
(we are in places we don't belong)


The statements REEK of "resignation" and "apology" rather than "pride".

What he is saying is... "I'm sorry, my liberal brother and sisters... I really don't want to be engaging in military activities, but my hands are tied... if we do nothing, we will be involved in a larger problem later anyway."

He can't dismantle the parts of the Military he doesn't like, as easily as he had hoped. Like any good ultra-liberal... he is ASHAMED at America's military power, and influence in the world. He wants to make us more like the weaker nations he apologizes to. It sucks that we REMAIN a military superpower, to him.

Most Americans are proud we can kick ass if we need to. They are proud that we hold the position in the world we do.

Obama is too busy apologizing for it, to appreciate it.

So, knowing the President's history, I just can't agree with you. It's a case of "he said - she said"

I'm the "he" though.


Image
Last edited by CraigMaxim on Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest