A good guy with a gun is the best defense against a bad guy?
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:10 pm
Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix
Welcome to the BandMix Community of Musicians, Bands and Industry Professionals!
https://forum.bandmix.com/
A good guy with a gun is the best defense against a bad guy?
Page 1 of 5
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:10 pmPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:19 pmAnything negative to make guns and gun owners look like monsters Huh Jimmy? I guess you hate guns and gun owners Huh? You are such a DICK SMOKER! P.S. puff once for yes and twice for no!
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:22 pmHe was an ex-Navy Seal sharpshooter with the best sniper record and his gun didn't help him did it. You must be so proud of your fellow Texan POS.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:28 pmjimmydanger wrote:He was an ex-Navy Seal sharpshooter with the best sniper record and his gun didn't help him did it. You must be so proud of your fellow Texan POS.
He was helping a friend with PTSD they were all 3 veterans and you'll find he was shot in a situation where he didn't have access to his weapon and he trusted the little PHUK that prolly shot him in the back. You always jump to conclusions without all the facts! Just like you did with Sandy hook and everything else you react to emotionally! Think with your brain you UNGRATEFUL DUMBPHUK! This, THIS RIGHT HERE, is what Grant was talking about, you post STUPID SH!T and EVERYONE on this forum laughs at your DUMB@SS Shelly!
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:31 pmthat's a damn shame.
yep....guns kill people.
good guys. bad guys. the guns don't care. and still people bitch about their rights being violated by "needless" background checks.
yeah, i know the argument. b'b'b'b'b'but all the bad guys have guns!
gee, i wonder why that is!!! it's because we live in a society and culture where it's always been too damn easy to GET guns. too late now....we've already screwed the pooch by making it so damn easy to get 'em.
is it any wonder why we live in a country that has by far the highest per capita rate of firearm deaths of all developed countries?
and yet there are people who still believe the answer is easy access to more guns (to protect themselves).
yep....guns kill people.
good guys. bad guys. the guns don't care. and still people bitch about their rights being violated by "needless" background checks.
yeah, i know the argument. b'b'b'b'b'but all the bad guys have guns!
gee, i wonder why that is!!! it's because we live in a society and culture where it's always been too damn easy to GET guns. too late now....we've already screwed the pooch by making it so damn easy to get 'em.
is it any wonder why we live in a country that has by far the highest per capita rate of firearm deaths of all developed countries?
and yet there are people who still believe the answer is easy access to more guns (to protect themselves).
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:36 pmPer capita rate of what?
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:40 pmgtZip wrote:Per capita rate of what?
Planetguy wrote:is it any wonder why we live in a country that has by far the highest per capita rate of firearm deaths of all developed countries?
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:04 pmhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wor ... d-country/
The U.S. gun murder rate is about 20 times the average for all other countries on this chart. That means that Americans are 20 times as likely to be killed by a gun than is someone from another developed country.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:08 pmWhy was Mexico excluded?
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:04 pmgtZip wrote:Why was Mexico excluded?
Its the liberal way offer biased statistics from LIBERAL sources and conveniently leave out the parts that tip the results in the other direction!
Jimmy YOU LIBERALS are the REAL MONSTERS! You'll THROW away YOUR rights for an unobtainable society. Problem is you want to FORCE me to do it too! In a nutshell you'll jump off a cliff and DEMAND I jump too?
For you poor liberals NOT smart enough to comprehend that if folks want to kill each other in the maddened rage they will grab WHATEVER weapon is available. Your biased results don't say anything about what the murder rate is in those countries vs. what it is here. You just offer gun statistics.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:15 pmJ-HALEY wrote:
For you poor liberals NOT smart enough to comprehend that if folks want to kill each other in the maddened rage they will grab WHATEVER weapon is available. Your biased results don't say anything about what the murder rate is in those countries vs. what it is here. You just offer gun statistics.
well jeff, it's not that i don't appreciate you looking out for my "liberty" and my "freedom" but ya know what...if someone decides to come after me in a "maddened rage" i'd prefer taking my chances of them doing it w a salt shaker and a fistfull of napkins over them using an assault weapon, and several handguns.
...but that's just me.
as for the murder rate in other countries compared to here....you're kidding right? ok i'll give you mexico.....but who else do you think is even remotely close in per capita murder stats? swedes? fins? brits? those murderous frostback canadians? or.....????
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:20 pmJ-HALEY wrote:gtZip wrote:Why was Mexico excluded?
Its the liberal way offer biased statistics from LIBERAL sources and conveniently leave out the parts that tip the results in the other direction!
good one duuuude! cos' we know no one on the right would ever distort any stats to make a point in THEIR favor.
seriously jeff....statements like that really do little for your credibility, buddy.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:01 amPlanetguy wrote:J-HALEY wrote:gtZip wrote:Why was Mexico excluded?
Its the liberal way offer biased statistics from LIBERAL sources and conveniently leave out the parts that tip the results in the other direction!
good one duuuude! cos' we know no one on the right would ever distort any stats to make a point in THEIR favor.
seriously jeff....statements like that really do little for your credibility, buddy.
Its the TRUTH Mark sorry you can't handle the TRUTH!
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:49 amPlanetguy wrote:J-HALEY wrote:gtZip wrote:Why was Mexico excluded?
Its the liberal way offer biased statistics from LIBERAL sources and conveniently leave out the parts that tip the results in the other direction!
good one duuuude! cos' we know no one on the right would ever distort any stats to make a point in THEIR favor.
seriously jeff....statements like that really do little for your credibility, buddy.
I didn't think Jeff had any to start with.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:32 amMike Nobody wrote:Planetguy wrote:J-HALEY wrote:gtZip wrote:Why was Mexico excluded?
Its the liberal way offer biased statistics from LIBERAL sources and conveniently leave out the parts that tip the results in the other direction!
good one duuuude! cos' we know no one on the right would ever distort any stats to make a point in THEIR favor.
seriously jeff....statements like that really do little for your credibility, buddy.
I didn't think Jeff had any to start with.
Not from liberals and I don't need nor want credibility from you guy's! I would like to get along with you but that can't be when ya'll want to intimidate me into submission. Just a word of advise STOP TRYING! We will all be able to get along when that happens. Stop the insults and I will too. Keep the insults coming and its Garrante'd to come back to you! jus sayin!