Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

Two public shooting sprees in a matter of days.
A couple people in a mall didn't get enough reaction, so today it's mass killing at a grade school...

Great Britan does just fine with billy clubs.. I am not a fan of handguns anyhow, just like Lynard Skynard said, "they are just made for killin" in Saturday Night Special tune.. over my dead body, will they take my long rifles and shotguns though..

We don't want your hunting rifles or shotguns! We want semi-automatic weapons banned! And it will happen, this is out of control.

jimmydanger wrote:We don't want your hunting rifles or shotguns! We want semi-automatic weapons banned! And it will happen, this is out of control.

I hope not.
Semi-automatics are more important to defend ourselves from the government.
Anybody who thinks the 2nd amendment is in place to protect duck hunters is a moron.
It's defense against the government itself.

I was wondering when you libs were gonna start screaming gun control! Isn't it illegal to own a gun in Mexico? If a criminal wants a gun they are GOIN TO GET IT! Take guns away from law abinding citizens and only criminals will have guns! If one of those administrators would have had a gun there would probably be less children dead. Try that sh!t in Texas and your @ss will get capped! Lets not fight and bicker there are DEAD CHILDREN FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!

jimmy, did you mean semi-automatics or auto/matics.. ? ..many long rifles and shotguns generally meant for hunting purposes are semi-automatic?.. I have pump shotguns and bolt action rifles so I'm good to go?.. I can see the authorities showing up at homes and inspecting your firearms collection though?.. if they are even kept at the house?

"Make that 3".. "I'm going to the mall, too".. lol

And we don't need no handgun or shotgun, the semi-auto assault rifles work the best.. lol

Mike Nobody wrote:I hope not.
Semi-automatics are more important to defend ourselves from the government.
Anybody who thinks the 2nd amendment is in place to protect duck hunters is a moron.
It's defense against the government itself.

Gee, I don't remember the last time we had to defend ourselves against the government. Oh that's right, it was never.

The 2nd Amendment was established at a time when we had hostile Indians and no police department. It's time to amend the amendment.

jimmydanger wrote:

Mike Nobody wrote:I hope not.
Semi-automatics are more important to defend ourselves from the government.
Anybody who thinks the 2nd amendment is in place to protect duck hunters is a moron.
It's defense against the government itself.

Gee, I don't remember the last time we had to defend ourselves against the government. Oh that's right, it was never.

The 2nd Amendment was established at a time when we had hostile Indians and no police department. It's time to amend the amendment.

Didn't you just say the other day that drug gangs were cruising the streets of Detroit shooting people? Do you REALLY think those guys are going to turn their guns in? So you are wanting to take guns away from law abiding citizens and your going to count on the police to protect you? The police sure couldn't protect those 18 children so what makes you think they give a damn about protecting you?

jimmydanger wrote:

Mike Nobody wrote:I hope not.
Semi-automatics are more important to defend ourselves from the government.
Anybody who thinks the 2nd amendment is in place to protect duck hunters is a moron.
It's defense against the government itself.

Gee, I don't remember the last time we had to defend ourselves against the government. Oh that's right, it was never.

The 2nd Amendment was established at a time when we had hostile Indians and no police department. It's time to amend the amendment.

Oh, I think persons In Waco, Texas or at Rainbow Farm in Michigan would disagree!
If you read what the founding fathers had to say about it, they were VERY mindful of government overreach and wanted insurance against a repeat of the oppression they experienced under King George III.
Owning firearms was an insurance policy against the government turning into Big Brother...like NOW.
Honestly, cops are so incompetent and corrupt nowadays, they're more trouble than they are worth.

Mike Nobody wrote:

jimmydanger wrote:

Mike Nobody wrote:I hope not.
Semi-automatics are more important to defend ourselves from the government.
Anybody who thinks the 2nd amendment is in place to protect duck hunters is a moron.
It's defense against the government itself.

Gee, I don't remember the last time we had to defend ourselves against the government. Oh that's right, it was never.

The 2nd Amendment was established at a time when we had hostile Indians and no police department. It's time to amend the amendment.

Oh, I think persons In Waco, Texas or at Rainbow Farm in Michigan would disagree!
If you read what the founding fathers had to say about it, they were VERY mindful of government overreach and wanted insurance against a repeat of the oppression they experienced under King George III.
Owning firearms was an insurance policy against the government turning into Big Brother...like NOW.
Honestly, cops are so incompetent and corrupt nowadays, they're more trouble than they are worth.

we need our guns to protect us from the people supposedly hired to protect us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nil_N_7JOYQ

Well... If there were to be a gun ban, how would you get the guns that are already out there?

The German government right after WWI enacted laws that basically said "all firearms, as well as all kinds of firearms ammunition, are to be surrendered immediately."[2] Under the regulations, anyone found in possession of a firearm or ammunition was subject to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 marks.

Gee, I don't remember the last time we had to defend ourselves against the government. Oh that's right, it was never.

Right on bro.. That's why we're all still British and serve the queen.

Yeah and we did it all without machine guns, automatic and semi-automatic assault rifles. Dumbass.