Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

I would say this is true but it would mean that the republicans had already discounted the 3 million conservative voters who stayed away and refused to vote for a offshore investment banker soft on everything except tax breaks for people like himself
and that seems implausible, unless you believe that the RNC is not interested in jobs and hard working americans just accumulating wealth at the expense of people who actually work

Sorry buddy that's a pile of Fox droppings. Approx. 70 million people voted for him; there are not 70 million people receiving assistance, nowhere near. Most who voted for him are like me - have jobs, pay taxes and don't trust the Republicans. Romney was a poor candidate, you said yourself you didn't really like him but that anyone would be better than Obama. Apparently most of the country didn't agree.

jimmydanger wrote:Sorry buddy that's a pile of Fox droppings. Approx. 70 million people voted for him; there are not 70 million people receiving assistance, nowhere near. Most who voted for him are like me - have jobs, pay taxes and don't trust the Republicans. Romney was a poor candidate, you said yourself you didn't really like him but that anyone would be better than Obama. Apparently most of the country didn't agree.

I know, you post your drivel so I'll post mine! DEAL?

Post whatever crap you find under the rock called Fox News, I think we've come to expect it. Meanwhile I will always repudiate said crap, also as expected.

jimmydanger wrote:Sorry buddy that's a pile of Fox droppings. Approx. 70 million people voted for him; there are not 70 million people receiving assistance, nowhere near. Most who voted for him are like me - have jobs, pay taxes and don't trust the Republicans. Romney was a poor candidate, you said yourself you didn't really like him but that anyone would be better than Obama. Apparently most of the country didn't agree.

what jimmy said. w one correction though.....not "apparently" but obviously.

i'm not on any assistance and neither are any of the folks i know who voted for obama. we voted for him because we believe he's a better choice than Mittens. simple as that. and blaming it on sandy, nor'easters, easter bunnies, or people wanting sh*t for free is more bull dookey that the sore losers are trying to peddle.

now, instead of rubbing our hands in anticipation w spittle on lips hoping, praying, and waiting for obama to screw the pooch...shouldn't we all hope he does a great job? wouldn't THAT be a more responsible and reasonable attitude to take?

(cue the haters to say: yeah, but he's already a f**k so why should we expect any diff?)

jimmydanger wrote:Post whatever crap you find under the rock called Fox News, I think we've come to expect it. Meanwhile I will always repudiate said crap, also as expected.

And you can expect the same from me on the CRAP you post as it is known to be expected from you as well liberal bullsh!t!:lol:

California and New York elected him

And Michigan and Ohio and every other rational thinking state.

jimmydanger wrote:And Michigan and Ohio and every other irrational thinking state.

I fixed your mis-spelled word there Jimster! Your welcome!

You know, neither candidate is really a good choice.

To be so vehement about the lesser of 2 morons doesn't seem to be a great maneuver, don't you think?

I would have voted for ANYONE else besides those 2.
This election was a def bottom of the barrel scraper, as in we got nothing to cheer about no matter which douchebag won.

Would you rather have Mr. Inept or Mr. Jackass?

I say someone qualified who would do a great job would be the best choice and you know we didn't get the choice of anyone that even remotely resembles that.

This election = everyone lost and it remains to be seen what the real damage will be.

J-HALEY wrote:

jimmydanger wrote:And Michigan and Ohio and every other irrational thinking state.

I fixed your mis-spelled word there Jimster! You're welcome!

Ah changing someone's quote, I see Fox News has taught you well!

And I changed your misspelled word. De nada!

jimmydanger wrote:

J-HALEY wrote:

jimmydanger wrote:And Michigan and Ohio and every other irrational thinking state.

I fixed your mis-spelled word there Jimster! You're welcome!

Ah changing someone's quote, I see Fox News has taught you well!

And I changed your misspelled word. De nada!

I figured you'd catch that one Dr. Cooper. It was "just for you"

And here's one just for you! De nada!

Here is the video that started the Liberal Bias press spin about 47%. Keep in mind, the only thing wrong in his assertion was that it was '47' percent. But he is not wrong about the large segment of takers in this country, who expect to be handed everything. (For a moment there I though he might havebeen referring to voters under 21)

I should add...In this Country I have never seen so many fkn cowards, who cant own up to their faulty way of believeing, that some how, their neighbors 'owe' them something... Its making me hate this cess pool called America