Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

Here is how much the currrent administration cares about security of American Embassy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... #pagebreak

can't wait for Romney to get in there to correct things... a good ole fashioned nuclear exchange will teach them Muzzies a thing or two..

That was pretty funny. The "security" they cut was a DC-3 used for "security operations"? Exactly how would that old airplane have prevented or mitigated the attacks? It wouldn't have.

jimmydanger wrote:That was pretty funny. The "security" they cut was a DC-3 used for "security operations"? Exactly how would that old airplane have prevented or mitigated the attacks? It wouldn't have.

Bless your heart Jimmy you are so blind you only see and read what you want hear. Since you have a reading comprehension problem I'll splain it to you! That DC-3 could have evacuated and or transported them so they didn't have to travel by car in a hostile area. Did you read that little part about them being denied special forces protection. The bottom line is YOUR Obama LIED about that attack calling it a response to a video on youtube. It was a PLANNED terrorist attack on 9/11 Obummer denied Ambassador Stevens support and as a result he is Dead! Again I ask are you IGNERNT!

and Romney would have improved the situation by doing what exactly?

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:and Romney would have improved the situation by doing what exactly?

Dane, another rediculous question and purely speculative! No one can say what Romney would have done different. I believe he would put together a more RESPONSIBLE administration that would handle these kind of events in a positive way. He would use a concept Obummer doesn't know its called LEADERSHIP! When he is President you can see for yourself!

this was a security failure of the STATE DEPARTMENT. I think it would be much more apt to blame Hillary, if anyone. But I think it's prudent to single out the people who actually made those decisions, not the guy who had 5 degrees of separation and relied on his staff to inform him there was even a problem, to which he was most likely completely unaware of. There's not enough hours in the day for the prez to manage every detail of everything that goes on in the world.

That being said, I understand the expectation on him that he's ultimately in charge, and that when answer-time came, that he was mis-informed and repeated that misinformation, and is held accountable for that, but if he were to come out and say exactly that, his critics would only bash him worse for blaming someone else.

So I see his dilemma and will defer my disappointments and criticisms to the heads at the state department, whose failure ultimately cost american lives. That's what this is about- american lives, right? I find it unseemly to use those lives as a political tool, especially when there's so many easier ways to dismantle Obama without resorting to wedge issues and propaganda.

Let's talk about his drone strikes on innocent families in pakistan or his assassination of american citizens.. or Obamas atrocious record of using the justice department to silence whistle-blowers.

J-HALEY wrote:

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:and Romney would have improved the situation by doing what exactly?

Dane, another rediculous question and purely speculative! No one can say what Romney would have done different. I believe he would put together a more RESPONSIBLE administration that would handle these kind of events in a positive way. He would use a concept Obummer doesn't know its called LEADERSHIP! When he is President you can see for yourself!

your response, "there he goes again", was very Romneyesque, just like Romney, you claim under another regime the situation would have been handled appropriately, but just like Romney, you give no details as to how it could have been handled differently?.. you and Romney have better ideas, but can never seem to reveal the fine print..

Kramerguy wrote:this was a security failure of the STATE DEPARTMENT. I think it would be much more apt to blame Hillary, if anyone. But I think it's prudent to single out the people who actually made those decisions, not the guy who had 5 degrees of separation and relied on his staff to inform him there was even a problem, to which he was most likely completely unaware of. There's not enough hours in the day for the prez to manage every detail of everything that goes on in the world.

That being said, I understand the expectation on him that he's ultimately in charge, and that when answer-time came, that he was mis-informed and repeated that misinformation, and is held accountable for that, but if he were to come out and say exactly that, his critics would only bash him worse for blaming someone else.

So I see his dilemma and will defer my disappointments and criticisms to the heads at the state department, whose failure ultimately cost american lives. That's what this is about- american lives, right? I find it unseemly to use those lives as a political tool, especially when there's so many easier ways to dismantle Obama without resorting to wedge issues and propaganda.

Let's talk about his drone strikes on innocent families in pakistan or his assassination of american citizens.. or Obamas atrocious record of using the justice department to silence whistle-blowers.

Why not he's been blaming somebody else for 4 years! Its called being a LEADER you surround yourself with people that won't put you in this situation! Its obvious from his Golf Playing to his lackluster performance at the debate the Man does NOT want to do the WORK of being President. It is also OBVIOUS whom is running the country and IMO it AINT Obummer it is OTHER PEOPLE!

I think Obama's lackluster performance at the debate, was he could not argue with somebody who was lying.. it took the fun out of it, when Obama was debating a guy saying things that were contrary to his own statements the past few months..

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:I think Obama's lackluster performance at the debate, was he could not argue with somebody who was lying.. it took the fun out of it, when Obama was debating a guy saying things that were contrary to his own statements the past few months..

well, he did call Romnocchio out a little bit on him changing his story. my take is that obama's handlers gave him clear cut directions to stay above the fray, be "presidential", and don't get down and dirty. and THAT's why he had those pained looks of frustration...having to hold his tongue and stay w that plan.

i think the next debates are going to be very, very different. i don't think obama is gonna be playing quite so nicely for these next two rounds.

Planetguy wrote:

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:I think Obama's lackluster performance at the debate, was he could not argue with somebody who was lying.. it took the fun out of it, when Obama was debating a guy saying things that were contrary to his own statements the past few months..

well, he did call Romnocchio out a little bit on him changing his story. my take is that obama's handlers gave him clear cut directions to stay above the fray, be "presidential", and don't get down and dirty. and THAT's why he had those pained looks of frustration...having to hold his tongue and stay w that plan.

i think the next debates are going to be very, very different. i don't think obama is gonna be playing quite so nicely for these next two rounds.

Your Funny and I am getting tired of this foolishness! You go ahead Mark and have the last word I will leave it at OBUMMER is the liar!

with Obama re-elected we have a chance for peace.. with Romney elected I am afraid he is a little too eager to attack Iran... and attacking Iran will only bring about suffering to Israel, the U.S. and western Europe.. if not suffering much higher gas prices.. or bloodshed.. pick your poison..

J-HALEY wrote:

Planetguy wrote:

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:I think Obama's lackluster performance at the debate, was he could not argue with somebody who was lying.. it took the fun out of it, when Obama was debating a guy saying things that were contrary to his own statements the past few months..

well, he did call Romnocchio out a little bit on him changing his story. my take is that obama's handlers gave him clear cut directions to stay above the fray, be "presidential", and don't get down and dirty. and THAT's why he had those pained looks of frustration...having to hold his tongue and stay w that plan.

i think the next debates are going to be very, very different. i don't think obama is gonna be playing quite so nicely for these next two rounds.

Your Funny and I am getting tired of this foolishness! You go ahead Mark and have the last word I will leave it at OBUMMER is the liar!

Planetguy wrote:

J-HALEY wrote:

Planetguy wrote:

Dane Ellis Allen wrote:I think Obama's lackluster performance at the debate, was he could not argue with somebody who was lying.. it took the fun out of it, when Obama was debating a guy saying things that were contrary to his own statements the past few months..

well, he did call Romnocchio out a little bit on him changing his story. my take is that obama's handlers gave him clear cut directions to stay above the fray, be "presidential", and don't get down and dirty. and THAT's why he had those pained looks of frustration...having to hold his tongue and stay w that plan.

i think the next debates are going to be very, very different. i don't think obama is gonna be playing quite so nicely for these next two rounds.

Your Funny and I am getting tired of this foolishness! You go ahead Mark and have the last word I will leave it at OBUMMER is the liar!

Romney won because he was more energetic and aggressive not because he lied!