This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#187680 by Kramerguy
Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:19 pm
"hey lady, I give you $100 (that's more than $2 for every point of IQ you have) to tell the camera that obama gave you and everyone in cleveland a free phone, and SS welfare, and oh yeah.. $20 bonus if you reply that mitt sucks when we ask you how you feel about him"

Reminds me of OWS# back when Fox news would send in reporters who would locate the most homeless, clueless, and idiotic person they could find to interview as an "OWS founder".

It's like watching jerry springer.. lowest common denominator.

Don't tell me Jeff that you actually believe this tripe :oops:

#187686 by J-HALEY
Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:35 pm
Kramerguy wrote:"hey lady, I give you $100 (that's more than $2 for every point of IQ you have) to tell the camera that obama gave you and everyone in cleveland a free phone, and SS welfare, and oh yeah.. $20 bonus if you reply that mitt sucks when we ask you how you feel about him"

Reminds me of OWS# back when Fox news would send in reporters who would locate the most homeless, clueless, and idiotic person they could find to interview as an "OWS founder".

It's like watching jerry springer.. lowest common denominator.

Don't tell me Jeff that you actually believe this tripe :oops:


Kramer don't tell me you actually believe that little scenario you made up? Face the facts Bud that's the kind of people Obama wants voting for him. My mom is way smarter than that lady but she thinks JUST LIKE HER! Furthermore my mom has one of those phones. She also has her own phone!

#187696 by Kramerguy
Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:10 pm
Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.


Read the full question line here:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

You mean to tell me jeff that this type of political sabotage doesn't happen? Both sides do it, this isn't about taking sides, it's about our politicians and their people who represent them to the media- lying to us and spreading useless propaganda like that to get people to vote exactly the way they want you to.

#187699 by J-HALEY
Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:12 pm
Kramerguy wrote:
Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.


Read the full question line here:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

You mean to tell me jeff that this type of political sabotage doesn't happen? Both sides do it, this isn't about taking sides, it's about our politicians and their people who represent them to the media- lying to us and spreading useless propaganda like that to get people to vote exactly the way they want you to.


Do you know for a fact this is what happened in this case?

#187879 by Kramerguy
Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:55 pm
J-HALEY wrote:
Do you know for a fact this is what happened in this case?


I know for a fact that she's lying. I already cited my proof.

Whether or not she's a republican plant or just one of the stupidest people in america is your call.

Let me ask you- Does it matter? Considering the truth is that the video is intentionally false and misleading and politically dishonest, why would it make more difference is shes a plant or not? Clearly she's not the person who posted the video.

#187889 by J-HALEY
Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:14 pm
Kramerguy wrote:
J-HALEY wrote:
Do you know for a fact this is what happened in this case?


I know for a fact that she's lying. I already cited my proof.

Whether or not she's a republican plant or just one of the stupidest people in america is your call.

Let me ask you- Does it matter? Considering the truth is that the video is intentionally false and misleading and politically dishonest, why would it make more difference is shes a plant or not? Clearly she's not the person who posted the video.


In response to your "proof" perhaps you should choose an unbiased source for your facts! :wink:

I am saying I know of and personally "KNOW FOR A FACT" people with the same beliefs as the woman in the video. My own mother believes the same way! You can stay blinded to what is going on you will NEVER not in a bazillion years convince me that the majority of the 47% liberlism, the left, believes exactly the same way this lady does! :)

#187899 by Kramerguy
Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:52 pm
wait a second... you are accusing factcheck.org of being biased?

Have you ever visited that site, seriously?

Jeff, really.. I know you want to see things your way, but for starters, factcheck.org is about the most unbiased site on the net. They don't print opinions, they fact-check what other sites post and point out all the misinformation, nothing more, nothing less. They challenge democrats equally as hard as they do republicans, and if you had ever been to that site, you would realize that.

They exist for the sole purpose of putting TRUTH out there for people like us to be able to check the alleged "facts" that other sites post, and also that political camps spew... They are there as much for your benefit as mine.

Exactly what sites do you consider to be unbiased? Of all the sites you've ever linked, I've seen little but right-wing propaganda sites that cannot provide citations to their own statements.

Why would you spit on one of the very few unbiased sites that actually helps people hold their leaders to a higher standard such as simply not lying to the people?

I'm truly astonished and amazed that you would so blindly discount the citation of proof that I provided without any citation or link of any contrary and verifyable information. I'll accept some wiki sites, or any news site (like alternet) that provides citations within it's articles. Get to work or eat your words.

#187904 by jimmydanger
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:22 pm
I'm amazed that you're amazed. The entire Republican campaign has one aim - to remove Obama from office. The lies and distortions they have presented as facts are a joke. Watch the debate on Wednesday and decide if clinging to independence is worth the chance that Romney wins. Because if he wins, you lose.

#187905 by J-HALEY
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:36 pm
jimmydanger wrote:I'm amazed that you're amazed. The entire Republican campaign has one aim - to remove Obama from office. The lies and distortions they have presented as facts are a joke. Watch the debate on Wednesday and decide if clinging to independence is worth the chance that Romney wins. Because if he wins, you lose.


I think you have that as we say here in Texas "back a$$wards"

Besides Your Boy is already admitting defeat LMFAO! :lol:

#187906 by Kramerguy
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:42 pm
jimmydanger wrote:I'm amazed that you're amazed. The entire Republican campaign has one aim - to remove Obama from office. The lies and distortions they have presented as facts are a joke. Watch the debate on Wednesday and decide if clinging to independence is worth the chance that Romney wins. Because if he wins, you lose.


Frankly, my whole point is that it doesn't matter who wins. We end up with a fascist traitor in office.

There's no longer a lesser of two evils. Both report to the same corporate masters. Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

#187909 by J-HALEY
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:46 pm
Kramerguy wrote:
jimmydanger wrote:I'm amazed that you're amazed. The entire Republican campaign has one aim - to remove Obama from office. The lies and distortions they have presented as facts are a joke. Watch the debate on Wednesday and decide if clinging to independence is worth the chance that Romney wins. Because if he wins, you lose.


Frankly, my whole point is that it doesn't matter who wins. We end up with a fascist traitor in office.

There's no longer a lesser of two evils. Both report to the same corporate masters. Brought to you by Carl's Jr.


Thanks but I'll take my chances! :lol:

#187915 by J-HALEY
Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:07 pm
jimmydanger wrote:The odds get narrower by the day.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/even ... 39896.html


More Lie's from the liberal media and the GLOWING MESIAH! Um I mean Tyrant!

#187917 by jimmydanger
Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:18 pm
Liberal Media definition: anything written that does not agree with the neocon agenda. Fox News has Obama ahead by at least 5%; are they liberal too? And just how did Obama manage to buy all of the media in the country? Repubs make me laugh.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest