Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

He must, he keeps putting it in his mouth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/1 ... 77266.html

jimmydanger wrote:He must, he keeps putting it in his mouth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/1 ... 77266.html

Charles Krauthammer said it best when he noted that the embassy cow-towed. He called it disgraceful. I agree .. The egyptian protesters had no call to attack our embassy on 9/11. They were outrageously disrespectful

"The Romney campaign drew fire on Wednesday morning for issuing a blistering statement condemning the American embassy in Egypt for speaking against an incendiary anti-Muslim film, even though the embassy made the statement before any attacks had taken place"

no argument on the egyptian protesters being waaay outa line ....but how did the embassy "cowtow"? by speaking out against a film they felt to be hateful and incendiary???

what's "disgraceful" about that?

PaperDog wrote:

jimmydanger wrote:He must, he keeps putting it in his mouth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/1 ... 77266.html

Charles Krauthammer said it best when he noted that the embassy cow-towed. He called it disgraceful. I agree .. The egyptian protesters had no call to attack our embassy on 9/11. They were outrageously disrespectful

Those people hate our ass. Peaceful Muslims Huh! I have been PISSED ever since reports of attacks! Come on attack the embassy on 9/11 Any one that thinks these folks want to be our friends has their head in the sand PERIOD!

Even without considering the inflammatory parody of Islamic religion, this looks like a film hateful of the values of film making. Ah, the sound of the warehouse room ambiance depicted out in the vastness of the 'green screen' desert.

http://youtu.be/y6lcJxmdqWM

I think they maybe should have included a laugh track so people would realize it's a comedy.

Planetguy wrote:"The Romney campaign drew fire on Wednesday morning for issuing a blistering statement condemning the American embassy in Egypt for speaking against an incendiary anti-Muslim film, even though the embassy made the statement before any attacks had taken place"

no argument on the egyptian protesters being waaay outa line ....but how did the embassy "cowtow"? by speaking out against a film they felt to be hateful and incendiary???

what's "disgraceful" about that?

PG, for you and I its one thing...But from a world-class level diplomatic stance its way quite another thing. First off, The embassy announced its opinon against the film 'after' protesters held them down. From a diplomats point of view, the coerced apology and opinion was equivalent to being held hostage and then taped to cite a script.

The embassy had nothing to do with any films, and they were deliberate;y targeted by what amounts to Al Qaeda sympathizers...

The proper response would have been to tell 'those" particular protester to cease & decist. (A polite way of saying "Go To hell" )


This is quite possibly the biggest Issue I have with Obama admin... They're apologizing at every turn for sh*t we didn't do! As A commander in Chief, his first priority is to stand for his own flag first... (or step down and let somebody else do the job)

PaperDog wrote:

Planetguy wrote:"The Romney campaign drew fire on Wednesday morning for issuing a blistering statement condemning the American embassy in Egypt for speaking against an incendiary anti-Muslim film, even though the embassy made the statement before any attacks had taken place"

no argument on the egyptian protesters being waaay outa line ....but how did the embassy "cowtow"? by speaking out against a film they felt to be hateful and incendiary???

what's "disgraceful" about that?

First off, The embassy announced its opinon against the film 'after' protesters held them down.

p-dog, what's your source that states it was AFTER? i haven't seen anything along those lines.

an American embassy has no obligation to issue critiques of artistic expression,
they did so only in fear for their lives.
that was the 1st mistake, well sometimes when you make a mistake, you don't get an opportunity for a second.
so it was in this case.

now it is illustrated well, that if you speak, you need to fear for your life.

it is time we returned the favor.

Amen

Planetguy wrote:

PaperDog wrote:

Planetguy wrote:"The Romney campaign drew fire on Wednesday morning for issuing a blistering statement condemning the American embassy in Egypt for speaking against an incendiary anti-Muslim film, even though the embassy made the statement before any attacks had taken place"

no argument on the egyptian protesters being waaay outa line ....but how did the embassy "cowtow"? by speaking out against a film they felt to be hateful and incendiary???

what's "disgraceful" about that?

First off, The embassy announced its opinon against the film 'after' protesters held them down.

p-dog, what's your source that states it was AFTER? i haven't seen anything along those lines.

This was Krauthammer's take;

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/11/kraut ... ell-video/

Just about every story on this alludes to the irrelevance of the Video and the role of the embassy. In Other words We didn't do it! Why are they attacking us and why on 9/11?

PaperDog wrote:

Planetguy wrote:

PaperDog wrote:

Planetguy wrote:"The Romney campaign drew fire on Wednesday morning for issuing a blistering statement condemning the American embassy in Egypt for speaking against an incendiary anti-Muslim film, even though the embassy made the statement before any attacks had taken place"

no argument on the egyptian protesters being waaay outa line ....but how did the embassy "cowtow"? by speaking out against a film they felt to be hateful and incendiary???

what's "disgraceful" about that?

First off, The embassy announced its opinon against the film 'after' protesters held them down.

p-dog, what's your source that states it was AFTER? i haven't seen anything along those lines.

This was Krauthammer's take;

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/11/kraut ... ell-video/

Just about every story on this alludes to the irrelevance of the Video and the role of the embassy. In Other words We didn't do it! Why are they attacking us and why on 9/11?

Bingo, they are doing it on 9/11 as a slap in our face. They know that attacking our embassy on 9/11 is the equivalent of us burning their Koran and is the message they are trying to send us! Then you have folks like Jimmy, and Prevost that want to turn it in to that "Bad ole U.S.A.!

JCP61 wrote:an American embassy has no obligation to issue critiques of artistic expression,
they did so only in fear for their lives.
that was the 1st mistake, well sometimes when you make a mistake, you don't get an opportunity for a second.
so it was in this case.

now it is illustrated well, that if you speak, you need to fear for your life.

it is time we returned the favor.

who said they did it out of "obligation"????

they're living in an area that is 110% muslim. some jerkoff comes out w a "film" that just about everyone can agree IS offensive (and not just to muslims) and they (embassy folks) have the sensitivity and good sense to try to point out that the "film" was insensitive and in bad taste. no one at the embassy "apologized" for making the film.

were "politics" at play here? no doubt. so the f**k what? do you think any embassy anywhere doesn't have to consider politics and ramifications?

again...the persons responsible for storming the embassy are idiots. trust me, we have no shortage of idiots here either.

again i'll ask that folks consider this... these hateful nutjobs do not reperesent ALL muslims. these particular nutjobs have blanket across the board for ALL americans.

if you agree that is wrong...then how can you then condone and embrace blanket across the board hatred of ALL muslims???

you're guilty of the exact same thing. you're just waving a different flag than the nutjobs.

seems pretty wacky and hypocritical to me. then, what do i know...i'm just a dumb bassplayer.

the duty of the state is to enforce the maxim that violence by the state is the only legitimate violence.
this has been true thru out history.
it is true today.

violence not sanctioned by the state is a criminal act.
and must be punished.

I am not swayed by false effeminate feelings of motherly love toward peoples that wish me ill.

JCP61 wrote:
I am not swayed by false effeminate feelings of motherly love toward peoples that wish me ill.

and no one is aying you SHOULD be "swayed by false effeminate feelings of motherly love toward peoples that wish me ill."

i'm saying your goofball notion that ALL muslims wish you ill is precisely that...a goofball notion.

and just as likely a convenient excuse and an easy target to siphon off some built up hate and hostility.

it's ok though...hate loves company.

the only goofball notion is that you somehow know the difference between the muslims that wish you dead and the ones that love you.

i submit that you are alone in that fantasy world, not withstanding the fact others share it in diverse locations.