Page 1 of 2

New home studio song - not a loop

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:03 pm
by neanderpaul
New track posted. I recorded at home. Bass, drums, Cigar box guitar, 12 vocal parts. Tear it apart. I already know what I'm not happy with. :wink: Are we ever satisfied?

First song on my player "the situation"

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:30 pm
by PaperDog
Interesting song Paul.

Technically its good, lively, energetic, good vocals structure, good lyrics...

I think that thematically, it begs for a circa 1920's "Putting on the Ritz", neo-flapper ambience to it (That's just me tho) . Its a fun, dynamic song and I got a lot of visuals of slap-stick theatric in there when I hear this... :) Could have a lot of fun with it.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:44 pm
by JCP61
pretty straight ahead, everything in it's place.
I'm not qualified to judge this style. early to mid 60's it sounds to me if you ignore the tech.

the sound is very thin, very digital.
that's about the only criticism i could offer.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:58 pm
by neanderpaul
JCP61 wrote:pretty straight ahead, everything in it's place.
I'm not qualified to judge this style. early to mid 60's it sounds to me if you ignore the tech.

Wow! I get older music comparisons from time to time. Usually I can see it. Man I can't see this one at all. That's not a complaint. I just don't get it.

JCP61 wrote:the sound is very thin, very digital.
that's about the only criticism i could offer.

Fact, that's my biggest problem with it.
thank you!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:59 pm
by neanderpaul
PaperDog wrote:Interesting song Paul.

Technically its good, lively, energetic, good vocals structure, good lyrics...

I think that thematically, it begs for a circa 1920's "Putting on the Ritz", neo-flapper ambience to it (That's just me tho) . Its a fun, dynamic song and I got a lot of visuals of slap-stick theatric in there when I hear this... :) Could have a lot of fun with it.

Like the musical feel theme? Or the lyrical theme?
thanks!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:05 pm
by MikeG9699
I like it! Great guitar work also.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:09 pm
by Cajundaddy
Fun song, great energy, maybe over-the-top production. The mix is almost comical and reminds me a bit of these guys:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jadvt7Cb ... re=related

Is that the goal?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:10 pm
by neanderpaul
Awesome Mike! Thanks! That is my 4 string cigar box guitar.
Image

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:12 pm
by neanderpaul
TheJohnny7Band wrote:Fun song, great energy, maybe over-the-top production. The mix is almost comical and reminds me a bit of these guys:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jadvt7Cb ... re=related

Is that the goal?

Lol, no, accident. Can I get you to listen to the next song on my player "I think I love you" for a production/mix opinion?
thanks!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:22 pm
by Cajundaddy
neanderpaul wrote:
TheJohnny7Band wrote:Fun song, great energy, maybe over-the-top production. The mix is almost comical and reminds me a bit of these guys:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jadvt7Cb ... re=related

Is that the goal?

Lol, no, accident. Can I get you to listen to the next song on my player "I think I love you" for a production/mix opinion?
thanks!


Your mixes are always fresh, bold and very different from song to song. "The Situation" is my most favorite song and least favorite mix of the three. "I Think I Love You" is the easiest mix to listen to and absorb the music for these ears. I like it.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:23 pm
by neanderpaul
I really appreciate the feedback!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:41 pm
by JCP61
neanderpaul wrote:
JCP61 wrote:pretty straight ahead, everything in it's place.
I'm not qualified to judge this style. early to mid 60's it sounds to me if you ignore the tech.

Wow! I get older music comparisons from time to time. Usually I can see it. Man I can't see this one at all. That's not a complaint. I just don't get it.

JCP61 wrote:the sound is very thin, very digital.
that's about the only criticism i could offer.

Fact, that's my biggest problem with it.
thank you!


i guess what occurred to me at first listen, was 65' surf music
traditional rock as electrics were just taking over, traditional rock as in rock that was still recorded for dancing.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:07 pm
by Cajundaddy
JCP61 wrote:
i guess what occurred to me at first listen, was 65' surf music
traditional rock as electrics were just taking over, traditional rock as in rock that was still recorded for dancing.


A bit of DEVO, a bit of Dick Dale... I can see that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8CnurLc ... re=related

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:20 pm
by neanderpaul
JCP61 wrote:
neanderpaul wrote:
JCP61 wrote:pretty straight ahead, everything in it's place.
I'm not qualified to judge this style. early to mid 60's it sounds to me if you ignore the tech.

Wow! I get older music comparisons from time to time. Usually I can see it. Man I can't see this one at all. That's not a complaint. I just don't get it.

JCP61 wrote:the sound is very thin, very digital.
that's about the only criticism i could offer.

Fact, that's my biggest problem with it.
thank you!


i guess what occurred to me at first listen, was 65' surf music
traditional rock as electrics were just taking over, traditional rock as in rock that was still recorded for dancing.

Thanks to Johhny7's link I hear it. Thanks friends!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:05 am
by gbheil
I'm probably not the one to critique ... sounds damn thin to me Paul.

Probably the mix ...