Page 1 of 10

Ralph Nader says Obama should be impeached

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:01 am
by Mike Nobody

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:14 am
by fisherman bob
Democracy Now is true drivel on the radio. I have NEVER heard them allow callers to call in to dispute ANY of their points of view. Democracy Now is anything but a democratic radio program, it should be re-named Communist Dictator Radio Now.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:31 am
by Mike Nobody
fisherman bob wrote:Democracy Now is true drivel on the radio. I have NEVER heard them allow callers to call in to dispute ANY of their points of view. Democracy Now is anything but a democratic radio program, it should be re-named Communist Dictator Radio Now.


Are you aware that radio shows like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck use hired actors as callers? Premiere On Call is a company owned by Clear Channel designed for that purpose.

http://www.ktradionetwork.com/nwo/radio-syndication-company-uses-actors-to-fake-radio-call-ins/

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:46 am
by fisherman bob
Mike Nobody wrote:
fisherman bob wrote:Democracy Now is true drivel on the radio. I have NEVER heard them allow callers to call in to dispute ANY of their points of view. Democracy Now is anything but a democratic radio program, it should be re-named Communist Dictator Radio Now.


Are you aware that radio shows like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck use hired actors as callers? Premiere On Call is a company owned by Clear Channel designed for that purpose.

http://www.ktradionetwork.com/nwo/radio-syndication-company-uses-actors-to-fake-radio-call-ins/
Are you aware that I've heard MANY dissenting opinions from callers on the Rush Limbaugh program? I don't listen to Beck. I think he's a paranoid conspiracy theorist who isn't worth a crap IMO. I listen to both liberal and conservative radio programs. I don't really like either one. The biggest problem we have in our country is a massive divide between opposing viewpoints. There really could be a very comfortable middle ground, but neither side seems concerned with finding that middle ground. It's either their way or the highway. I'm NOT interested in anything the DEMS or REPS have to say any more. We need a third party. A sensible party that has practical, cost effective answers. We need social programs but funded in a way that doesn't bankrupt the country. I've got some ideas and I've been seriously thinking about running for some office. I'm not kidding. If I could run for dogcatcher and get up and give my opinions it probably wouldn't hurt...I'd give it to the established politicians with both barrels...

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:05 am
by Hayden King
I agree with Bob. And Ralph!

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:56 pm
by Slacker G
Tried as a traitor would be more fitting. Along with the other tyrants that are defying the will of the American people and catering to a select few who want to see freedom abolished in the name of Socialism.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:38 pm
by Mike Nobody
Slacker G wrote:Tried as a traitor would be more fitting. Along with the other tyrants that are defying the will of the American people and catering to a select few who want to see freedom abolished in the name of Socialism.


:roll:

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:47 pm
by fisherman bob
Why hasn't Obama ended American participation in the Middle East conflicts or closed Guantanomo like he said he would? Perhaps, just perhaps, there's a LOT more going on in the Middle East than the American government is willing to divulge. Perhaps, JUST PERHAPS, we DID discover MANY weapons of mass destruction OR discover AL Qaeda plans that included weapons of mass destruction OR already have weapons of mass destruction. There's sh*t going on over there that, in a time of WAR, are NOT going to be revealed to the public. Did you ever hear the expression "loose lips sink ships?" Being at war is a SERIOUS matter. There's many thousands of people who would like nothing more than to destroy us. Revealing info to the public gives precious info to the enemy that could lead to our destruction. Obama's hands are tied. He's NOT a war criminal, just as Bush is NOT a war criminal. I think in due time we will all find out how dangerous this war really is. Hopefully after ALL the scum lined up against us are VAPORIZED first...

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:59 pm
by Mike Nobody
fisherman bob wrote:Why hasn't Obama ended American participation in the Middle East conflicts or closed Guantanomo like he said he would? Perhaps, just perhaps, there's a LOT more going on in the Middle East than the American government is willing to divulge. Perhaps, JUST PERHAPS, we DID discover MANY weapons of mass destruction OR discover AL Qaeda plans that included weapons of mass destruction OR already have weapons of mass destruction. There's sh*t going on over there that, in a time of WAR, are NOT going to be revealed to the public. Did you ever hear the expression "loose lips sink ships?" Being at war is a SERIOUS matter. There's many thousands of people who would like nothing more than to destroy us. Revealing info to the public gives precious info to the enemy that could lead to our destruction. Obama's hands are tied. He's NOT a war criminal, just as Bush is NOT a war criminal. I think in due time we will all find out how dangerous this war really is. Hopefully after ALL the scum lined up against us are VAPORIZED first...


Did you ever hear the expression "All governments are lying c*cksuckers?"

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:10 pm
by gbheil
The communist / globalist controlled left propaganda machine would never allow Rush or any other conservative radio show to get away with using ringers.

That is an out right lie. As is normal with socialist propaganda.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:12 pm
by Mike Nobody
sanshouheil wrote:The communist / globalist controlled left propaganda machine would never allow Rush or any other conservative radio show to get away with using ringers.

That is an out right lie. As is normal with socialist propaganda.


:roll: :roll:

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:29 pm
by gbheil
LOL


Truth hurts some HUH.

Seriously Obama's ( as well as numerous other presidents ) treason and ineffectiveness as a leader is just a symptom of a much more insidious problem that has affected our entire political process.
Globalist profiteering

The only way to fix it is strict constitutionality of law and renewal of American Sovereignty.

Opinions and law of foreign dictators did not mean sh*t to our founding fathers.
And still should not.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:32 pm
by Mike Nobody
sanshouheil wrote:LOL


Truth hurts some HUH.

Seriously Obama's ( as well as numerous other presidents ) treason and ineffectiveness as a leader is just a symptom of a much more insidious problem that has affected our entire political process.
Globalist profiteering

The only way to fix it is strict constitutionality of law and renewal of American Sovereignty.

Opinions and law of foreign dictators did not mean sh*t to our founding fathers.
And still should not.


Oh, I'm not defending Obama. But, that horsesh*t about him being a socialist gets tiresome.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:20 pm
by Slacker G
Oh, I'm not defending Obama. But, that horsesh*t about him being a socialist gets tiresome.

Tiresome perhaps.

But it will be even more tiring when the US becomes a Socialist state.

Heil Obumpkin!!

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:22 pm
by Slacker G
Oh, I'm not defending Obama. But, that horsesh*t about him being a socialist gets tiresome.


Perhaps tiresome now. But it will be even more tiresome when America becomes a Socialist state.