Page 1 of 3

10 Reasons the Iraq War Was No Cakewalk

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:00 pm
by Mike Nobody
10 Reasons the Iraq War Was No Cakewalk

By Medea Benjamin and Charles Davis

March 19 marks the eighth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, a nation that had no weapons of mass destruction and was not involved in the 9/11 attacks. It was sold to the American public as a war to defend our nation and free the Iraqi people. U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said our soldiers would be greeted as liberators and that Iraqi oil money would pay for the reconstruction. Vice President Dick Cheney said the military effort would take "weeks rather than months." And Defense Secretary Assistant Ken Adelman predicted that "liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk."

Eight years on, it's time to look back at that "cakewalk."

1. 4,400 U.S. Soldiers Lost for a Lie
More than 4,400 Americans have died as a result of the invasion and occupation of Iraq -- more than were killed on 9/11. Over 32,000 U.S. soldiers have been seriously wounded, many kept alive only thanks to the miracle of modern medicine.

But those numbers don't tell the half of it. Stanford University and Naval Postgraduate School researchers who examined the delayed onset of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) found that, by 2023, the rate of PTSD among Iraq war veterans could rise as high as 35 percent. And for the second year in row, more soldiers committed suicide in 2010 than died in combat, a tragic but predictable human reaction to being asked to kill -- and watch your friends be killed -- for a war based on lies.

2. Bankrupting Our Nation
In 2008, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard University's Linda Blimes put the cost of the Iraq War at roughly $3 trillion, or about 60 times what the Bush administration first said the invasion would cost. But while a staggering figure, Stiglitz and Blimes now say that their estimate "was, if anything, too low." In an update published last fall in the Washington Post, they note that the war not only drove up the federal debt, but helped drive the skyrocketing oil prices that contributed to the crashing of the global economy.

According to the National Priorities Project, the money the U.S. government spent destroying Iraq could have provided yearly salaries for 12.5 million teachers or paid the annual healthcare costs for 167 million Americans. When elected officials tell us our nation is bankrupt, we should tell them to bring our war dollars home.

3. Hundreds of Thousands of Iraqi Dead
The ones who have suffered the most from the Iraq "cakewalk," of course, are the Iraqis themselves. For an invasion sold as an act of liberation and "profound morality" by propagandists like Jeffrey Goldberg, the U.S. and its allies sure managed to kill a staggering number of those they were liberating. The group Iraq Body Count (IBC) has documented at least 99,900 violent civilian deaths as a direct result of the U.S.-led invasion. But that's an extremely conservative estimate based largely off deaths reported in Western media, an approach bound to undercount the massive death toll from the invasion. Indeed, as WikiLeaks revealed last October, the U.S. government covered up the violent killings of more than 15,000 Iraqi civilians -- killings that weren't reported by any Western paper -- or roughly 20 percent of IBC's official count at the time.

Unfortunately, the number of Iraqi souls liberated from their bodies is likely a lot higher than IBC's count. A 2006 study by researchers at John Hopkins University published in the Lancet medical journal found that in just over three years there had been 654,965 "excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war," with Iraq's death rate more than doubling due to gunfire -- the leading cause of mortality -- and a lack of medicine and clean water. A January 2008 analysis by British polling firm Opinion Research Business, meanwhile, estimated "that over 1,000,000 Iraqi citizens have died as a result of the conflict which started in 2003."

4. Lights Still Out
Thirteen years of bombings and sanctions crippled the infrastructure and basic services of what was once a wealthy country. Then came the 2003 invasion, which destroyed electrical plants, sewage systems, water treatment facilities, hospitals and more. Eight years later, the living conditions of Iraqis are worse than under Saddam Hussein, with the country plagued by a continued lack of electricity, clean water, medical care and security. Iraqis wonder how it is, after the most powerful country in the world occupied it and ostensibly spent billions on reconstruction, they are still living in the dark.

5. Millions Flee Their Homes
According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, since 2003 "more than 4.7 million Iraqis have fled their homes, many in dire need of humanitarian care" -- hardly an endorsement of life in the "liberated" nation. Many Iraqis fled their homes to seek asylum in Iran, Jordan and Syria, while roughly 1.5 million fled to other parts of Iraq, the majority of which "have found no solutions to their plight," according to the UN. In the aftermath of ethnic cleansing, millions will never be able to return.

6. Women and Girls Forced into Prostitution
Women in Iraq have been particularly hit by the invasion and occupation. The Iraqi government estimates there are up to 3 million widows in Iraq today. Meanwhile, violence against women -- including honor killings, rape and kidnapping -- has soared , forcing many women to remain at home and limiting employment and educational opportunities, according to a new Freedom House report. "A deep feeling of injustice and powerlessness sometimes leads women to believe that the only escape is suicide," the report notes.

Many Iraqi women who fled to neighboring countries have found themselves unable to feed their children. Just to make ends meet, tens of thousands of them -- including girls 13 and under -- have been forced into lives of prostitution, particularly in Syria.

"From what I've seen, 70 percent to 80 percent of the girls working this business in Damascus today are Iraqis," one refugee told the New York Times. "If they go back to Iraq they'll be slaughtered, and this is the only work available."

7. Poisoning Iraqi Society
The U.S. military dropped thousands of bombs across Iraq laced with depleted uranium, the radioactive waste produced from manufacturing nuclear fuel. Valued by the military for its density and ability to ignite upon impact, depleted uranium bombs continue to kill years after they've been dropped. In Fallujah, which was bombarded more than anywhere else in Iraq, British researchers uncovered a massive increase in infant mortality and rates of cancer, with the latter exceeding "those reported by survivors of the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki," according to the Independent.

And it's not just Fallujah facing a cancer epidemic. Al Jazeera reports that in the central Iraq province of Babil, reported cancer cases rose from 500 in 2004 to 7,000 in 2008. And in Basrah, the last 15 years have seen the childhood leukemia rate more than double, according to a study published last year in the American Journal of Public Health.

8. Trading One Strongman for Another
Saddam Hussein was a bad guy. Yet his worst crimes, including the 1980 invasion of Iran, came when he was backed by the U.S. government, which was well aware of his penchant for torture and extrajudicial killings -- talents American officials were fine with so long as he was slaughtering Iranians. Now his U.S.-backed successor, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, is torturing and killing those who speak out against his rule -- all he hasn't done is invade that other, not-yet-liberated member of the "axis of evil."

Inspired by the mass actions that took down U.S.-backed strongmen in Egypt and Tunisia, thousands of Iraqis have taken to the streets to protest the al-Maliki government -- only to be greeted with live ammunition. On February 27, UPI reports that more than 29 protesters, including a 14-year-old boy, were gunned down by the Maliki-run security forces in Iraq. Meanwhile, four journalists in Baghdad report that they, along with hundreds of protesters, were "blindfolded, handcuffed, beaten and threatened with execution" for being insufficiently pro-regime.

The charges of abuse come after WikiLeaks revealed further evidence that Maliki has been using the power of the state -- and Shia death squads -- to torture and murder his political opponents. Sadly, life in the "new" Iraq isn't a whole lot different than life under Saddam. Given the protests sweeping North Africa and the Middle East, it seems invasions and foreign military occupations just aren't as effective at promoting reform as nonviolent protest.

9. A Recruitment Ad for al Qaeda
When it wasn't being sold as a humanitarian mission, the Bush administration cast the war on Iraq as a response to the 9/11 terror attacks, scaring the American public into submission with vials of faux-anthrax and concocted tales about Iraq's ties to al Qaeda. Yet as even U.S. intelligence agencies recognized after the invasion," the Iraq War has made the overall terrorism problem worse," in the words of one American official. Indeed, there was no better recruitment ad for terrorists than the images the Bush administration and its allies provided of foreign troops destroying Iraqi society. And there's no better way to create a committed enemy than to kill their family.

10. Legitimizing Violence, Rewarding War Criminals
Once you get past all the fanciful lies, rhetoric and rationalizations, the invasion of Iraq was just like any other war: it was about killing -- and teaching young men and women to believe that it's morally acceptable to take the life of another human being, that the supposed ends justify the homicidal means. And a 2007 Army investigation spurred by the massacre of two dozen Iraqi civilians in Haditha said as much.

"Statements made by the chain of command during interviews for this investigation, taken as a whole, suggest that Iraqi civilian lives are not as important as U.S. lives, their deaths are just the cost of doing business, and that the Marines need to get 'the job done' no matter what it takes," wrote Maj. Gen. Eldon Bargewell in the report.

People typically don't want to kill other human beings. They must be taught to do so; taught to dehumanize the enemy and believe that murdering another is not just okay, but just. That's what basic training is about: destroying a person's ability to empathize with the "other" for the good of the nation (or rather, its rulers). But that ability doesn't just suddenly reemerge when the war is over. And unfortunately, that's evidenced by the alarming incidents of domestic violence committed by returning veterans.

The invasion and occupation of Iraq will continue to affect lives decades after veterans of the war rejoin civilian life as police officers and husbands, as foremen and fathers. The lesson that violence is an acceptable means to achieve one's ends is not one soon forgotten.

But violence isn't just legitimized at base camp: it's legitimized by the Obama administration's failure to hold accountable those who took the country into an illegal war of aggression. Those war criminals -- the likes of George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice and Karl Rove -- are all enjoying successful book tours and hefty speaking fees, while the man who allegedly exposed war crimes, Bradley Manning, is behind bars being tortured. There's a lesson there -- one that doesn't speak well for our system of government. And it suggests that our political establishment will continue to drag us into wars of choice in the future. After all, they won't be fighting it. Or paying the consequences for it.

On this shameful anniversary, let's not forget that despite President Obama's promise to leave Iraq, the U.S. still has 50,000 troops there, thousands of private mercenaries and dozens of military bases, with generals not-so-subtly hinting at a permanent presence. We should demand the president close those bases and bring the troops home -- all of them. We should prosecute those responsible for sending them there. And we should apologize to the Iraqi people for the misery the U.S. government has wrought.

The damage of war has been done. But the U.S. can -- and must -- begin making amends to Iraq. And it can start by leaving.

Medea Benjamin (medea@globalexchange.org) is cofounder of CODEPINK: Women for Peace (www.codepinkalert.org) and Global Exchange (www.globalexchange.org). Charles Davis has covered Congress for NPR and Pacifica stations, and freelanced for the international news wire Inter Press Service.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:31 pm
by Hayden King
Mike I couldn't agree more and have taken note that the criminals in office and corporate Amerika don't have to pay consequences like everyone else does... just like the police.

Welcome to Amerika!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:55 pm
by Chaeya
You know, you have no idea the hate that was directed towards me when I protested our decision to go to war after 9/11. I told Cisco that Bush the Bastard was going to lead us into war, something we didn't need. I was set upon by many spouses of servicemen as "not supporting our troops" or "being anti-American." Yet no one could see - Hey Bin Laden, let's go attack Iraq. Does that make sense? Yes, everyone cried. Uh, sure. So I shut up.

Bush - War - Yay

Bush - Anti-Gays - Hey let's vote him back in office

We love tyrannical guys with dumb f**k ideas (Ronald Reagan), given the fact that America needs to get over their love affair of sensationalism. The dumbass Tea Party votes in all the Republicans - the very people who stand against what they want. The very people who want to take care of their rich cronies.

To get anywhere in this country, we need to abolish the two parties and have just ONE and stop all this bullshit.

Chaeya

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:04 pm
by Mike Nobody
Chaeya wrote:You know, you have no idea the hate that was directed towards me when I protested our decision to go to war after 9/11. I told Cisco that Bush the Bastard was going to lead us into war, something we didn't need. I was set upon by many spouses of servicemen as "not supporting our troops" or "being anti-American." Yet no one could see - Hey Bin Laden, let's go attack Iraq. Does that make sense? Yes, everyone cried. Uh, sure. So I shut up.

Bush - War - Yay

Bush - Anti-Gays - Hey let's vote him back in office

We love tyrannical guys with dumb f**k ideas (Ronald Reagan), given the fact that America needs to get over their love affair of sensationalism. The dumbass Tea Party votes in all the Republicans - the very people who stand against what they want. The very people who want to take care of their rich cronies.

To get anywhere in this country, we need to abolish the two parties and have just ONE and stop all this bullshit.

Chaeya


Well, the Republicrats kind of are one party. Can't we just abolish political parties altogether? That is what the founders actually wanted in the first place.

Image

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:36 pm
by Stringdancer
What’s needed is accountability, why is it that nobody gets punished for disasters such as this? Not only the responsible get a free pass they go on to retain their jobs and some get promoted.

Mike amongst the casualties listed in the article I have to include my relationship with my son coz I objected to his enlisting in the army, he did not appreciate my comment when I told him he was not going to fight for America he was going to fight for Halliburton.

Thankfully he completed his tour of duty in one piece and our relation thanks to hindsight is getting better.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:38 pm
by Chaeya
That's what I meant by One, there is no party.

Chaeya

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:28 pm
by gbheil
That is / was no war.

I could have cleaned Iraq & Iran out in six weeks with control of our military powers.

There are no "rules of engagement" in war other than kill the enemy.

Never go to war unless you intend to go all out.
Then return fully to the ways of peace.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:53 pm
by Mike Nobody
sanshouheil wrote:That is / was no war.

I could have cleaned Iraq & Iran out in six weeks with control of our military powers.

There are no "rules of engagement" in war other than kill the enemy.

Never go to war unless you intend to go all out.
Then return fully to the ways of peace.


Well, general, when are you replacing David Petraeus?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:23 am
by Chaeya
The accountable parties are too busy blaming Obama for everything. Loud mouth, finger pointers usually have the most to hide.

Chaeya

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:21 am
by ANGELSSHOTGUN
I can't believe all of this was posted.
I can't believe everyone has forgotten we drove Husssein out of Kuwait after he tried to take control of them. It took us 4 days, and casualties after DESTROYING their army amounted to maybe 50. Most of those were not combat related.
Bush 1 bowed to the UN and backed off after wasting all our taxpaying resources. Think about it, 4 days compared to the 8 year war Iran and Iraq waged against each other.

I can't believe everyone has forgotten that Iraq 2 was won in a week. The national guard and Iraq were finished. Hussein was history. We should have shut the borders to al queda coming in from Syria, and every open border to kill American troops.
OK once again we are making the very same mistakes we made in VietNam.

Our armed forces are NOT POLICEMAN. They are trained to KILL. When we as a nation call our sons and daughters to fight, it must be done understanding the gravest of consequences. We must understand that nation building or rebuilding is not the job of our military, WE TEACH THEM TO KILL, NOT STAND AROUND AND BECOME TARGETS.

Sad note , I can't believe everyone has forgotten that Pol Pot slaughtered over a million of his own country men for power and because of worldwide political interests, NOT CORPS, we stood around did nothing. Should I go on,Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro,? Funny, I never see these power hungry ,killers names , as corporation heads.

This wide open attack on such bs things is just a distraction on what is really going on. Mike, you remind of some one who is just pissed off because I just cut off your WELFARE CHECK.

As far as Ron Reagan, I grew up in the Era were we held regular drills , to go out in the hall and kiss our butts goodbye, because the Soviets were going to NUKE us. If he did one thing right, it was to end a major regime that had threatened us,,, my whole life time.

GEE isn't it funny how quickly the void is filled. :(

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:45 am
by ANGELSSHOTGUN
OH and Chaeya, After ignoring 14 UNITED NATIONS resolutions for full disclosure, after throwing UN inspectors out repeatedly, after world opinion all pointed to a tyrant that had already used WMD on his own people, to a congress comprised of progressives, liberals, democrats, independents, republicans ,conservatives, and every one else in between,,,THEY VOTED TO TAKE Hussein out.

These are the reasons and people that gave Bush the power to go to war. This was not a decision he made on his own. He had the backing of the very people you voted for.

My sorry commentary is how stupid we are that we did it TWICE.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:23 am
by Chaeya
My dear Glen, The reason we didn't go after Pol Pot and the others was because there was no money in it for us. Wars are about making money and gaining power. History much? We entered WWII because we were FORCED into it, not because we thought Hitler was a very bad man. The UN follows the loudest mouths and the biggest balls, namely us. Saddam's point was why the hell does he have to answer to them. The US wasn't exactly showing everyone their weapons of mass destruction. They were making everyone show their hands. The press painted Saddam as the next Hitler. Are you kidding me? They made up sh*t about how he tortured the people and so on. Hello, he's a dictator, they all torture people. He's a Sunni and they hate the Shi'ites and the Kurds, and vice versa. In all reality, the US was mad that Saddam didn't want to answer to them anymore.

The people were so blinded by anger after 9/11, they would have attacked any muslim nation.

I resent being suckered into a war using my emotions, I resent someone calling me anti-patriotic when in fact, I care what our soldiers are fighting and dying for. I don't believe in the For and Against spiel, Glen. I know they aren't meant to stand around, they're meant to kill, but not to appease a selfish loser who's in competition with his father. I resent Bush and his cabinet all being on the Board of Directors of every company supplying services and weapons over there at the time, which when they were called on their sh*t, they all quickly resigned and showed their tax earnings. Hello, rich people don't just file a 1040 and that's it. You file federal and state taxes FOR EVERY STATE YOUR COMPANY IS INCORPORATED. So of course it looks like they didn't earn that much money or anything from the war.

But I still love you, Glen, even if we don't agree on politics.

Chaeya

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:51 am
by philbymon
Glen - we kicked Hussein out of Kuwait because he was attacking them for drilling under his borders & stealing his country's oil.

Obviously, our armed forces ARE mere policemen, & have been thus since the Korean "War," if you look at the real history of it all. Our forces have again & again been used to ensure stale mates, NOT victories, in Korea (we were not trying to destroy the communist gov't in the north), in Viet Nam (we certainly weren't trying to destroy the North Vietnamese gov't), or in the Kuwait conflict (where we simply pushed Hussein's forces back until they stopped coming). Even now, after we HAVE taken out the first gov't since WWII with a military action, our forces are mere police, while contracted soldiers of fortune work alongside them, to the detriment of our economy, while the Reps cry about the waste in spending for NPR & PBS & culture & education for our ppl.

Reagan did far less than his predecessors in bringing down the Soviets, Glen, He just stood there & made fancy speeches & took all the credit for it. Oh, he put up a good bluff, too, but he didn't have the substance to back any of it up, while he armed our enemies in Central America & the mid east.

There were nuclear drills since WWII, Glen, worrying about the Soviets, but Reagan wasn't the guy that brought them down. Johnson & Nixon did the work, & Reagan just pranced around taking the credit. Reagan was the worst thing that ever happened to America, followed by GWB as a distant second. Reagan's actions will be what brings America to her knees, unless his actions are overturned, which isn't likely to happen at this point. It makes me sick to see him revered as anything but a conniving lying back-stabbing racist asshole who catered to his wealthy buddies to the detriment of every regular American citizen. He was the anti-christ. We may never be what we once were thanks to his bumbling bullshit & his sick way of giving everything away to those who would create the global economy without any restrictions which might benefit the health & welfare of the rest of us on this planet.

You mention Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, & Castro - what American leader took any of those rulers out? Not a damned one. We can't even take credit for Hitler, cuz that was a huge multinational effort. And for the rest, we simply sat on the sidelines & watched them destroy their people, like we did with Amin. In some cases, we even BACKED the regimes in the interest of American corp profits, like the recent Egyptian, or the Shah of Iran, or Noriega, cuz we wanted that cocaine in our poor neighborhoods.

The recent Republicans have proven to be the very globalists they used to accuse the Dems of being...& for what? Corp profits they claim will "trickle down" on the rest of us.

I'm sick to death of being trickled on...& false promises...& outright lies...& the protections of the few over the rest of us.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:37 am
by Mike Nobody
philbymon wrote:The recent Republicans have proven to be the very globalists they used to accuse the Dems of being...& for what? Corp profits they claim will "trickle down" on the rest of us.

I'm sick to death of being trickled on...& false promises...& outright lies...& the protections of the few over the rest of us.


ImageImage

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:57 pm
by MikeTalbot
Here where plenty of reasons to attack Iraq (quoted from my own piece on LewRockwell.com http://www.lewrockwell.com/peirce/peirce59.html)
I suggest you read it all before lynching me.
-------------------------------------------------------------begin quote

It was Iraqis who brought down the World Trade Center.

Saddam Hussein introduced poison gas and biological weapons into the Middle East.

It was the Iraqis who first deployed nuclear weapons in the region.

The Iraqis betrayed their ally the Serbs by bombing hospitals and schools in support of Al Queda terrorists.

Saddam is responsible for the teaching of promiscuity in our public schools.

He is the one responsible for the massacre of American civilians in Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.

It was Iraqi agents who convinced the US Congress that dismantling the Constitution was a good idea – changing the United States from a Republic to a mobocracy ruled by competing special interests.

Saddam took the US off the gold standard, setting the stage for an eventual economic catastrophe.

It is Iraq’s fault that American military forces are over deployed in the world today, making us vulnerable to attack by any and all enemies.

It was Saddam who undertook to disarm the American public, making us vulnerable to all sorts of crime, terrorism and government tyranny.

Those pesky Iraqis are flooding across our Southern border as if the United States was merely a third-rate power, incapable of defending it’s own territory or culture.

Saddam is responsible for the failure of the drug war, as well as the increasing militarization and inefficiency of our local police.

Iraqi warships and aircraft are sitting off our shores, waiting to invade.
Saddam Hussein attacks Texas frequently when US planes violate his supposed "no fly zone."

He has embargoed our country, keeping us from importing vital products while forbidding us to sell our own; causing economic hardship and the deaths of thousands of children.

The Iraqi prison system contains more prisoners than the total of all other prisons worldwide. Inside this corrupt prison system the inmates are routinely raped, beaten and even murdered while many are convicted of only minor offenses.

His regime is so demographically imposing that it might just be wise to attack now before his population increases from the already threatening twenty three million to some unspecified number where the US might find itself with less then the preferred ten to one advantage on the ground.

Saddam is a terrible dictator who beats up on the Kurds and Al Queda terrorists who threaten his regime, and we (who hate Al Queda) must destroy him together with our Turkish allies (who hate the Kurds). After all, it is rude of Saddam to interfere in our fights!
--------------------------- end quote

I was totally dismayed when a public school teacher wrote to me and thanked me for posting these justifications - said it helped her explain the war to her class. Astonishing what Americans are willing to believe. I wrote to her with the suggestion she look up the word "Satire" in her dictionary!

(guess who actually is responsible for all the things I accuse the Iraqis of)

For the record, I was against the First Gulf War too. Screw the super rich Kuwaitis. I'm a johnny reb from way back and to quote one of my own tunes, "...Minding your own, with both eyes open - Its one of the things that Smart Boys Do!"

cheers
That rabble rousing Talbot