Page 1 of 3

Reagan: Killer, Coward, Con-man

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 6:25 pm
by Mike Nobody
Reagan: Killer, Coward, Con-man

The Observer London
by Greg Palast
Monday, February 7, 2011

You're not going to like this. You shouldn't speak ill of the dead. But in this case, someone's got to.

On the 100th Anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth, as we suffer a week of Reagan-kitcheria and pukey peons, let us remember:

Reagan was a con-man. Reagan was a coward. Reagan was a killer.

In 1987, I found myself stuck in a crappy little town in Nicaragua named Chaguitillo. The people were kind enough, though hungry, except for one surly young man. His wife had just died of tuberculosis.

People don't die of TB if they get some antibiotics. But Ronald Reagan, big-hearted guy that he was, had put a lock-down embargo on medicine to Nicaragua because he didn't like the government that the people there had elected.

Ronnie grinned and cracked jokes while the young woman's lungs filled up and she stopped breathing. Reagan flashed that B-movie grin while they buried the mother of three.

And when Hezbollah terrorists struck and murdered hundreds of American marines in their sleep in Lebanon, the TV warrior ran away like a whipped dog - then turned around and invaded Grenada. That little Club Med war was a murderous PR stunt so Ronnie could hold parades for gunning down Cubans building an airport.

I remember Nancy, a skull and crossbones prancing around in designer dresses, some of the "gifts" that flowed to the Reagans - from hats to million-dollar homes - from cronies well compensated with government loot. It used to be called bribery.

And all the while, Grandpa grinned, the grandfather who bleated on about "family values" but didn't bother to see his own grandchildren.

The New York Times, in its canned obit, wrote that Reagan projected, "faith in small town America" and "old-time values."

"Values" my ass. It was union-busting and a declaration of war on the poor and anyone who couldn't buy designer dresses. It was the New Meanness, bringing starvation back to America so that every millionaire could get another million.

"Small town" values? From the movie star of the Pacific Palisades, the Malibu mogul? I want to throw up.

And all the while, in the White House basement, as his brain boiled away, Reagan's last conscious act was to condone a coup d'état against our elected Congress. Reagan's Defense Secretary Casper the Ghost Weinberger with the crazed Colonel, Ollie North, plotted to give guns to the Monster of the Mideast, Ayatolla Khomeini.

Reagan's boys called Jimmy Carter a weanie and a wuss although Carter wouldn't give an inch to the Ayatollah. Reagan, with that film-fantasy tough-guy con in front of cameras, went begging like a coward cockroach to Khomeini, pleading on bended knee for the release of our hostages.

Ollie North flew into Iran with a birthday cake for the maniac mullah - no kidding - in the shape of a key. The key to Ronnie's heart.

Then the Reagan roaches mixed their cowardice with crime: taking cash from the hostage-takers to buy guns for the "contras" - the drug-runners of Nicaragua posing as freedom fighters.

I remember as a student in Berkeley the words screeching out of the bullhorn, "The Governor of the State of California, Ronald Reagan, hereby orders this demonstration to disperse" - and then came the teargas and the truncheons. And all the while, that fang-hiding grin from the Gipper.

In Chaguitillo, all night long, the farmers stayed awake to guard their kids from attack from Reagan's Contra terrorists. The farmers weren't even Sandinistas, those 'Commies' that our cracked-brained President told us were 'only a 48-hour drive from Texas.' What the hell would they want with Texas, anyway?

Nevertheless, the farmers, and their families, were Ronnie's targets.

In the deserted darkness of Chaguitillo, a TV blared. Weirdly, it was that third-rate gangster movie, "Brother Rat." Starring Ronald Reagan.

Well, mis amigos, your kids can sleep easy tonight. The Rat is dead.

All week you're going to hear about how Reagan restored America's sense of patriotism - as if heartless slaughter, Club Med wars and making racism respectable are patriotic . (When they said "small town values" you know the color of the town, don't you?).

I wonder if the Reaganauts can recognize any of the weapons they sold the mullahs when they see students gunned down in Teheran.

I do plan a memorial, for the victims, not the victimizer.

Please join me in commemorating the ill star that brought us a celluloid cowboy on his movie-set horsey by lighting a candle for a mom from Chaguitillo.

******

This obituary was originally published in The London Observer on Reagan's death in 2004.

The author received close to 150 death threats and suggestions for acrobatic acts of intercourse with beasts and relatives.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:34 pm
by Sir Jamsalot
you have like 12 links to other profiles in your signature. You've been a busy bee :)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:23 pm
by Mike Nobody
SirJamsalot wrote:you have like 12 links to other profiles in your signature. You've been a busy bee :)


Needing some place to keep these organized. :)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:15 am
by fisherman bob
100% worthless drivel...

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:57 am
by philbymon
I hated that man to my core...still do.

Having voted for him in 80, I didn't trust myself to vote again until the last election...& now I wonder if maybe I didn't make a mistake that time, too!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:12 am
by Mike Nobody
philbymon wrote:I hated that man to my core...still do.

Having voted for him in 80, I didn't trust myself to vote again until the last election...& now I wonder if maybe I didn't make a mistake that time, too!


Obama is more conservative than Reagan.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:36 am
by ANGELSSHOTGUN
fisherman bob wrote:100% worthless drivel...


100% worthless drivel...
200% worthless drivel...

I love ignorance... Proves I still have a chance to RULE THE WORLD!!!!

Just like the bla CKEY epeas.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 am
by Scratchy
Looks like the Amway folks are coming out of the closet (and BM) to re-write the history of their best salesman.

Most of the people I knew back then were embarrassed to admit they voted for him.

I ran with Nader that election year.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:42 am
by TheCaptain
why..o why did I read this post...

Doesn't it seem/feel like the harder folks poke jabs at anything that's
in the arena of 'conservative' & 'traditional' (American in this case) the more they appear to be really just hurting & confused inside?

I could be wrong...

We need Reagan.
Ronnie...come back to us......

Come baackkkkkkk


**clarifying thought(s) while I was stepping into the shower...
I see a pattern.
What I see is that those who would call themselves liberal, progressive, whatever will attack a person, when there is a point of disagreement.
A conservative will often attack an opponents IDEOLOGY.

And there's a world of difference twixt the two.
Mike N: I would challenge you to outline in a few sentences just what you think this great Nation of ours ought to be about?
What would your guiding principles be,your moral plumb line as it were, if it were you at the helm?
In a nutshell: what would YOUR worldview be sir?

Lastly, I cannot believe that I'm getting into this type of discussion:
a. here
b. this early in the day

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:03 pm
by philbymon
I am no "liberal." Unlike, Reagan, I am what I consider to be a conservative - as in - a man who believes in personal freedoms, & personal responsibility. Reagan had neither of those attributes going for him. He embodied the very worst of the previous 3 administrations, & took them all a thousand steps farther, imho.

It was hard for me to have any faith in the guy who called his wife "mommy," & followed her lead in domestic policy, since it was so destructive to us all.

He followed the usual American pattern in arming those who would become our sworn enemies.

His tax policies still haunt us.

He took credit for things he had no hand in.

He took naps when he should have been working.

He was second only to GWB as the worst president in my lifetime. (Carter was a distant third.)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:10 pm
by Mike Nobody
philbymon wrote:He was second only to GWB as the worst president in my lifetime. (Carter was a distant third.)


All American presidents sucked on many levels in my lifetime. But, at least things were beginning to improve during Clinton's second term. That didn't last, though.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:17 pm
by Mike Nobody
celticpiping wrote:why..o why did I read this post...

Doesn't it seem/feel like the harder folks poke jabs at anything that's
in the arena of 'conservative' & 'traditional' (American in this case) the more they appear to be really just hurting & confused inside?

I could be wrong...

We need Reagan.
Ronnie...come back to us......

Come baackkkkkkk


**clarifying thought(s) while I was stepping into the shower...
I see a pattern.
What I see is that those who would call themselves liberal, progressive, whatever will attack a person, when there is a point of disagreement.
A conservative will often attack an opponents IDEOLOGY.


Baloney.

celticpiping wrote:And there's a world of difference twixt the two.
Mike N: I would challenge you to outline in a few sentences just what you think this great Nation of ours ought to be about?
What would your guiding principles be,your moral plumb line as it were, if it were you at the helm?
In a nutshell: what would YOUR worldview be sir?


For starters:
Freedom of speech and expression
Freedom of worship
Freedom from want
Freedom from fear
Justice for those that violate our highest laws (like, gee, Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes)

celticpiping wrote:Lastly, I cannot believe that I'm getting into this type of discussion:
a. here
b. this early in the day


I concurr. It's too early for this sh*t.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:22 pm
by MikeTalbot
Freedom from want? Work is the answer to that one - its not guaranteed by anyone - how could it be?

Freedom from fear? We're going to die. That's the maximum fear - doubt the govt can fix that one. Most other fears are tied to that one.

Sort of like wanting "freedom from hassle."

Although - yeah I'd love to have those things. But God help us when the govt gets involved.

Talbot

ps - I notice you only want to prosecute republicans. I don't like 'em either but they sure ain't any worse then the dems. Didn't slaughtering those kids at Waco make you wonder about Billy Jeff? How about bombing the snot out of Serbia to support islamic narco terrorists? Check their ID guards and you'll find scant difference between Repubs and Dems.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:38 pm
by Mike Nobody
MikeTalbot wrote:Freedom from want? Work is the answer to that one - its not guaranteed by anyone - how could it be?

Freedom from fear? We're going to die. That's the maximum fear - doubt the govt can fix that one. Most other fears are tied to that one.

Sort of like wanting "freedom from hassle."

Although - yeah I'd love to have those things. But God help us when the govt gets involved.

Talbot

ps - I notice you only want to prosecute republicans. I don't like 'em either but they sure ain't any worse then the dems. Didn't slaughtering those kids at Waco make you wonder about Billy Jeff? How about bombing the snot out of Serbia to support islamic narco terrorists? Check their ID guards and you'll find scant difference between Repubs and Dems.


Yeah, you could add Clinton for that. I'm not really pro-Dem. But, the worst sh*t seems to come from the Repugs.

The only thing as bad as government are corporations. Bureaucracy, in some form, will always be a necessary evil. But, it's better to err on the side of democracy than dictatorship. Centralized power, in any form, is dictatorship. JIMHO

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:00 pm
by TheCaptain
Freedom from want
Freedom from fear



that shows a level of immaturity and naivete about the world in general.


Sorry.
That is one thing at the crux of what makes liberal-minded folk at such odds with people like me.
Once I heard someone define why a liberal thinks the way he/she does.
And that is they don;t see that anything has "worked" yet...the ills of the world haven't been eradicated, and so they think they should come up with their "solution" to fix it all, and make all the bad stuff go away.

It's why it rolls off the tongue so easily for libs to think redistributing wealth, and every other failed policy will help the world.

blahh blahhhhblahh blahhhhblahh blahhhhblahh blahhhh

sorry mike , you're just all wrought, and I'm 1000% right!

Isn't that great?
I'm sooo riiighhtttt



I'm soooooo righttttttttt

ooooh it feels good to be sooooooo right



whatever