Somehow, I expected this
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/0 ... 91995.html
Of course, the tax that might have been made on the rich would have been the difference between making $50,000/month as opposed to $47,000 a month, in take home pay...while the continued unemployment bennies only means keeping or losing one's living space...we surely don't want that kind of socialism in THIS country, do we?
Of course, the tax that might have been made on the rich would have been the difference between making $50,000/month as opposed to $47,000 a month, in take home pay...while the continued unemployment bennies only means keeping or losing one's living space...we surely don't want that kind of socialism in THIS country, do we?