This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#89973 by CraigMaxim
Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:57 am
Who wants to become the new singer for Aerosmith?
LOS ANGELES (Reuters)

Image

The lead guitarist with one of America's most successful rock groups said on Monday that he and his bandmates were "positively looking for a new singer to work with," following a rift with energetic frontman Steven Tyler.

Joe Perry, 59, made the announcement on his Twitter page, ratcheting up an unusually public feud with his songwriting partner of 40 years.

The duo, dubbed the "Toxic Twins" for their hard-living days of yore, wrote such classic-rock staples as "Walk this Way" and "Love in an Elevator." Their musical relationship has been likened to that of their role models, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones.

But Tyler, 61, recently said he wants to concentrate on solo endeavors, a claim he has made in the past but never followed through on. He also stopped communicating with the rest of the band several months ago, and hired his own manager.

Perry told Reuters last month that Tyler has refused to write a song with him for a decade. More recently, Perry said that the last time he phoned Tyler, the singer hung up on him.

Incredibly, the band has still managed to perform concerts, but a summer trek through North America was cut short in August when Tyler fell off the stage and broke his shoulder. None of his bandmates accompanied him to the hospital.

"BRAND TYLER"

In recent weeks, Aerosmith reunited for a pair of shows in Hawaii, and then performed at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix on November 1, temporarily papering over the cracks to recoup some of the revenue lost by the canceled American tour.

But Tyler surprised his bandmates by telling Britain's Classic Rock magazine, in an article published last Wednesday, that he would focus on his own projects, "Brand Tyler," as he dubbed it.

His bandmates were less than enthusiastic about being sidelined. In the same article, guitarist Brad Whitford raised the possibility of bringing in a new vocalist.

Tyler was "one of a kind," it quoted Whitford as saying. "But if somebody was willing to do it and the chemistry was right, why not?"

Perry quickly took to Twitter to express his dismay at learning about Tyler's apparent departure online, and he described Tyler's attitude as "a bit cold."

In his Twitter messages on Monday, in which he referred to Tyler simply as "one of the members," Perry denied Aerosmith would break up, saying the band was playing "hotter than ever."

"You just can't take 40 years of experience and throw it in the bin!"

At any rate, Perry is now focusing on his own endeavors. He just released his fifth solo album, and plans an extensive world tour early next year.

Aerosmith previously fell apart in 1979, when Perry quit the band during its drug-fueled nadir. Whitford soon followed, leaving the rest of the band to limp along. The original lineup reconvened in 1984, sobered up, and eventually enjoyed a successful 1990s comeback fueled by MTV videos.

But the band has not released a studio album of new material since 2001. Recording sessions since then have been interrupted by ailments affected virtually every band member. For his part, Tyler did a stint in rehab last year.

While Perry has been vocal about the feud, Tyler has largely kept silent. But his daughter, Mia, also took to Twitter on Monday to defend him and to make a dig at Perry.

"They are in their 60s now," she wrote. "Let them do what they wanna do! & can someone please tell (Joe Perry) that gossiping on Twitter is uncalled (for)!"

The online encyclopedia Wikipedia wasted no time marking the personnel shift. Tyler is now mentioned among the former members.

#89978 by CraigMaxim
Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:05 am
'Dear Aerosmith...'
Please, please, please, let the split rumors be true!
By PETER LAURIA
NEW YORK POST
November 10, 2009


Image
The boys are at it again. Not unlike their late ’70s cocaine-fueled feuds, Aerosmith lead singer Steven Tyler and guitarist Joe Perry are once again talking some serious trash about each other and threatening to break up the band. Let’s hope the threat is real — Aerosmith, to borrow one of its album titles, needs to take a “Permanent Vacation” and make it stick.


Sorry AeroForceOne fans, but the Aerosmith that re-emerged on the musical scene in 1987 has done nothing but destroy the reputation of the iconic classic rock band of the 1970s that went by the same name. Admit it.


The heights to which Aerosmith have soared commercially in the last 20-plus years has been matched only by the depths it has plummeted to creatively. “Janie’s Got a Gun” is one of the band’s biggest hits, but it’s got nothing on “Toys in the Attic.” When you listen to earlier albums like “Rocks” and “Get Your Wings” and follow it up with recent efforts like “Get a Grip” and “Just Push Play,” it makes you wish the band would start doing some serious drugs again.


Let’s face it, sonically and lyrically, Aerosmith was always much better high than sober. Just download “I Ain’t Got You” and “Mother Popcorn” (a cover of the James Brown classic) from the Aerosmith album “Live Bootleg” and mourn all the promise this once-great band squandered. Those two little-heard songs, seemingly recorded in a Boston bar half-filled with drunken patrons during its earliest days, showcase Tyler and Perry at their finest.


Steven! Joe! You guys were supposed to be America’s Rolling Stones.


All the components were there. Booze- and barbiturate-infused blues band? Check. Crunchy, monster guitar riffs? Check. Deep bass and percussion grooves? Check, check.


Hell, Tyler even gives Mick Jagger a decent run for his money as the man with the largest lips in music.


And Aerosmith did indeed become the Rolling Stones, just not the version music fans had hoped. Today’s Aerosmith and today’s Rolling Stones have more in common than their original incarnations. Both are musically boring — when Tyler sings a scat version of the national anthem, you know he’s flat out of ideas. Both put out new albums simply so they can go on tour and make millions of dollars from fans desperate to hear the old ones.


What we’re trying to say here is that you guys have all stuck around for far too long.


Which gives us more reason to hope that yesterday’s rumors of a breakup actually stick.


The latest dust-up was provoked when Tyler told Classic Rock magazine that his next project was “definitely going to be something Steven Tyler, working on the brand of myself — Brand Tyler.”


This after the trout-pouted lyricist injured himself crashing off the stage during a concert in Abu Dhabi, forcing Aerosmith to cancel the rest of its tour and, evidently, straining relations among the band’s members.


Perry responded by unleashing a tirade in response to Tyler’s comments in media outlets ranging from the Las Vegas Sun to People.com to Aero-smith’s own Web site. Perry said, among other things, that Tyler hung up on him the last time he called, that the singer hasn’t been giving 100 percent “for a long time,” and that as far as he can tell Tyler quit the band.


Perry even goes so far as to suggest that Aerosmith may continue with another singer.


Don’t do it, Perry. This idea isn’t just bad — it’s phenomenally awful. The only thing worse than Aerosmith with Tyler is Aerosmith without Tyler.

#89987 by jimmydanger
Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:05 pm
Har har, remember the Joe Perry project? A band is known for its voice; Tyler will make a succesful solo album and Aerosmith will stall.

#89991 by J-HALEY
Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:31 pm
I always thought Steven Tyler was the main songwriter of the group. :shock:

#89993 by philbymon
Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:33 pm
Their drug prob's & personal prob's aside, I always thought they were a good band. Tyler's voice is incredible. He'll be hard to replace.

#90001 by CraigMaxim
Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:52 pm
philbymon wrote:Their drug prob's & personal prob's aside, I always thought they were a good band. Tyler's voice is incredible. He'll be hard to replace.



Yeah, I've always been an aerosmith fan too. Even "Janie's Got a Gun" "I Don't Want to Miss a Thing", etc... LOL

I agree with Jimmy that the VOICE of a band is often the "image of the band" but, when you have a history and name like Aerosmith, people will come see them. Especially if they get a known commodity to front them, ala Van Halen, who had a good run, even AFTER David Lee Roth. I don't know if getting an unknown would be the right move for Aerosmith, as Journey has done. Journey is a ballad band, and they have SO MANY hits, and NONE OF THEM sound the same without THAT EXACT Steve Perry style voice. But having a famos commodity front them, could actually kick new life into them maybe?

Of course, again though, when people hear Steven Tyler's voice on the radio, many will ASSUME that Aerosmith has a new song out, cause as Jimmy said, the voice is the band to our ears.

.

#90025 by Rev Mike
Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:07 pm
We're gonna get a Van Halen/Van Hagar thing going before the band finally stalls out and just like David Lee Roth, Steven Tyler will get a good 1st solo album and tour, but people will get tired of him and want T-Aerosmith back from what ever it becomes...

#90035 by CraigMaxim
Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:38 pm
I know one thing...

Those dudes are A LITTLE OLD to be breaking up NOW!

You have to do that sh*t a little past midway through your career, so you have time to reunite and have a huge reunion tour.

Someone might be dead, by the time that happens! LOL

.

#90079 by gbheil
Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:11 pm
I saw the Joe perry project live in Shreveport La.
They put on an good rock solid musical performance.
More than I can say for Aerosmith since ROCKS IMO.
Another hard driving rock band gone to pop rock little girly in love hell.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests