This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#198759 by jimmydanger
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:54 pm
Image

#198760 by Mike Nobody
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:55 pm
gtZip wrote:
Dane Ellis Allen wrote:martial????? :lol: :lol:


Doh!!
Yeah, martial.

Unless some guy named Marshall gets a law passed


OK, I'm plugging my amps in, CRANKED, and declaring MARSHALL LAW! :lol:

#198761 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:56 pm
211 babies died in 2009, due to dwi, should we outlaw beer?

2009 1314 babies died in non alcohol related crashes. Should we outlaw cars?

SEMI AUTO WEAPONS ARE NOT FOR HOME DEFENSE,,,,

They are to protect against a capricious and arbitrary government out of control. And you are telling us our government is all outdated and you basically are advocating the overthrow our government.

NOUGH SAID! Mr KRAMER.
:evil:

#198764 by jimmydanger
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:58 pm
Image

#198768 by gtZip
Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:12 pm
Mike Nobody wrote:
gtZip wrote:
Dane Ellis Allen wrote:martial????? :lol: :lol:


Doh!!
Yeah, martial.

Unless some guy named Marshall gets a law passed


OK, I'm plugging my amps in, CRANKED, and declaring MARSHALL LAW! :lol:


Fuk yeah!
8)

#198771 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:22 pm
jimmydanger wrote:Image


Jimmy you fuucking two faced liberal.
Why don't you post the sweet innocent pictures from MAD of all the babies killed in dwi crashes. Even better yet post the pictures of all the sweet innocent babies killed in NON ALCOHOL related accidents.
THE NUMBERS ARE TERRIFYING.

You should be the poster child for America,,, NO PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND NO TOLERANCE FOR OTHER PEOPLE.

#198778 by Slacker G
Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:52 pm
How about the numbers that are aborted and paid for by liberal policies? Why piss and moan about 20 children when millions are murdered every year? I wonder how many partial birth abortions happen every day?

Yet "dictator light" signed a bill that would have children who survived a partial abortion to be destroyed. Why not ban scissors, vacuum pumps and the other tools of the trade?

A scissors in the back of the neck and shoved up into the baby's skull to scramble their innocent little brains? A death sentence for being born. Now that's far more kinder and genteeler that a bullet in the head somehow.

Typical ploy to show that libs have a heart, as phony as that precept truly is, judging by their actions. They pretend that are concerned about children while they fund the assassins in the death clinics.

How about posting some aborted baby pics for us jimmy? You know, the ones missing little arms and legs that were ripped apart during the procedures? But then that was done out of loving concern for the children.
Last edited by Slacker G on Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

#198780 by Mike Nobody
Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:56 pm
Slacker G wrote:How about the numbers that are aborted and paid for by liberal policies? Why piss and moan about 20 children when millions are murdered every year? I wonder how many partial birth abortions happen every day?

Yet "dictator light" signed a bill to have children who survived a partial abortion to be destroyed.

A scissors in the back of the neck and shoved up into the baby's skull to scramble their innocent little brains? A death sentence for being born. Now that's far more kinder and genteeler that a bullet in the head somehow.

Typical ploy to show that libs have a heart, as phony as that precept truly is, judging by their actions. They pretend that are concerned about children while they fund the assassins in the death clinics.


Death clinics? :lol:

Hey honey, let's not be late for the appointment at the death clinic!
I feel like murdering babies today.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
:roll: :roll: :roll:

#198807 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:40 am
Vermont State Senator Maslak has come up with the most sensible solution to make everyone happy.




Introduced by Representative Maslack of Poultney

Subject: Executive; secretary of state; registration by citizens not owning firearms

Statement of purpose: This bill proposes to require Vermont residents who do not own firearms to register with the secretary of state, and to pay a $500.00 fee if the person is also eligible for military service. These requirements do not apply to law enforcement officers or members of the armed forces.

AN ACT RELATING TO REGISTRATION BY CITIZENS NOT OWNING FIREARMS

It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

Sec. 1. 3 V.S.A. § 118 is added to read:

§ 118. REGISTRATION BY CITIZENS NOT OWNING FIREARMS

(a) Residents of this state who are 18 years of age or older, and who do not own a firearm as defined in section 4016 of Title 13, shall be required to:

(1) register with the secretary of state's office, the person's name, address, Social Security number, and driver's license number and state of issuance; and

(2) pay a registration fee of $500.00 if the person is eligible for military service.

(b) The requirements imposed by this section shall not apply to residents who are law enforcement officers or members of the armed forces of this state or the United States.




Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun. Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as 'a clear mandate to do so'. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals. Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent."

Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says.

Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state. It's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.




yod says:

Now...some of the more honest liberals in the conversation would admit that they don't think this is "fair" or "good", yet this is exactly what they would have gun owners do.

#198809 by Slacker G
Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:54 am
Countries where the citizens are required to own guns do not have the problems that countries without guns have. I think he has a good idea. Gov phone and gov gun, yeah. That's the ticket. :wink:

#198819 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 am
AKs,ARs, PTR,s really are not good home defense weapons. AGREED!

But when some badass like Kramer wants to destroy the constitution,,, basically incite a revolution, start a civil war... sh*t. No wonder why it is so important for a left wing liberal nut case to get those weapons out of the hands of millions of Americans. AM I DESCRIBING OBAMA?


The second amendment was so important it was 2ND.
TO PROTECT AMERICANS FROM GOVERNMENT GONE WILD!

All you assholes, that just give up your rights don't have any right to FREEDOM,,,,
You never have and you never will. YOU HAVE NO PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ,,, OR TOLERANCE TO YOUR FELLOW MAN!

Neither did the folks that flew 2 planes into the world trade centers.

You guys are really fuucked up, your thinking is so twisted, distorted, you should find some help.

#198831 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:13 am
BUMP.

#198845 by Slacker G
Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:35 am
When the new taxes and the health care charges kick is, when our energy plants shut down and we don't have enough power,when the job market plunges deeper and faster than a pre gov toilet, when you loose your freedoms one at a time day by day, then they will understand what they have done. They didn't vote for this dictator light, they simply hit the "Like Button" just as they do for stores, commercials, game shows, reality shows, and the likes. The stupid shits thought it was a popularity contest for the one who looked the best physically. And yes, they are that shallow.

#198847 by gtZip
Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:37 am
Mike Nobody wrote:
Slacker G wrote:How about the numbers that are aborted and paid for by liberal policies? Why piss and moan about 20 children when millions are murdered every year? I wonder how many partial birth abortions happen every day?

Yet "dictator light" signed a bill to have children who survived a partial abortion to be destroyed.

A scissors in the back of the neck and shoved up into the baby's skull to scramble their innocent little brains? A death sentence for being born. Now that's far more kinder and genteeler that a bullet in the head somehow.

Typical ploy to show that libs have a heart, as phony as that precept truly is, judging by their actions. They pretend that are concerned about children while they fund the assassins in the death clinics.


Death clinics? :lol:

Hey honey, let's not be late for the appointment at the death clinic!
I feel like murdering babies today.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
:roll: :roll: :roll:



:lol:

Silly humans. Soul meets body upon first breathe.

#198891 by Slacker G
Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:23 am
Silly humans. Soul meets body upon first breathe.


There are a good many of us out here that know better than that . So just how do YOU know when the soul "Meets body" Give me some scientific proof of that. Since I believe in the living God, I also believe in the Bible as His word. And he quite defiantly disagrees with you thorough several examples in scripture.

God has credibility with me in what He claims. Your opinion is mere guesswork based on the nonsense that some other fool presented to you.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests