#188109 by Kramerguy
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:47 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:47 pm
Drumsinhisheart wrote:Perhaps a definition of socialism is needed here, because I do not see that policy employed in early American history.
http://www.worldsocialism.org/articles/ ... ialism.php
That is the world socialist website. I believe it contains a philosophy diametrically opposed to a Constitutional Republic, which is what America is.
In case I didn't state it properly, I had meant to say that socialist ideals were implemented to help build this country. There are ideals of all natures embedded into our systems. Some have been more successful than others, but it's my belief that the best success this country had, arguably 1950-?, was because of massive citizen unions, involvement, and social programs that allowed everyone to work and live on a more even scale. The rich were still rich and the poor were still poor, but nowhere near the dramatic levels today.
That site is a little off-putting simply because it's defining socialism in it's purest form. Image a definition of capitalism in it's purest form. Scary as hell. We've seen our country come close to that in the 1800's where workers were abused, kids in work camps, little to no pay (taken away for rents), hazardous work conditions, etc.. If you read up on it, it's fairly horrifying. No pure "ISM" is a good thing, not one.
Drumsinhisheart wrote:I do NOT want everything held in common ownership by everybody, which means government ultimately controls it.
Perhaps nationalism, capitalism, and socialism all combined? All I know is that Oil, metals, water, air- common resources that we all share, have been gobbled up by capitalists and we're being made to believe that it's perfectly fine for them to take government lands (we the peoples land) so they can exploit it, process it, then sell it back to us for obscene profits. It's bullcrap.. and half these companies aren't even paying taxes or headquartered in the US, or even owned by americans (BP, anyone?).
Drumsinhisheart wrote:I do NOT want politicians of any stripe in control of ANYTHING other than what the Constitution allows. They wreck whatever they touch.
Where ya been? They control the constitution itself, I agree they wreck everything - power corrupts, and the system our founders put in place- three branches all in charge of oversight of each other, have merged and broken down the barriers, which is why we continue to spiral downwards. The foxes are in control of the hen-house. How can anything be much worse? We may not be slaves, but we are no doubt indentured to the powerful and wealthy. Freedom in america is nothing more than an illusion, and your constitution? Nothing more than a warm-fuzzy sheet of paper that is ignored at will. Don't think so? Look up the patriot act, the NDAA, etc.. all clearly violate the constitution, yet continue to exist and override it.
Drumsinhisheart wrote:I do NOT want to live in a Democracy - majority rule - which the Founders knew was little more than mob rule, and there always follows persecution of minorities when majorities have the final say. I want to live under the rule of law, as defined by the US Constitution.
how is representative government any different when all the representatives are corrupt and have gamed the system? Compared to that, democracy doesn't really look all that bad. But I don't really want either. I think the government should exist solely to protect, defend, and serve the people. period.
Drumsinhisheart wrote:I do NOT want to live in a global community controlled by a "Democratic" majority deciding what I need in life.
See above
Drumsinhisheart wrote:Nothing has been done in American history according to socialistic principles. That is erroneous. Roads were paid for, money given to free capitalist companies to build them. Many have challenged, on Constitutional principles, whether the federal government has any business entering the "space race." It did so in response to Soviet activities. Private enterprise would have gotten man into space and to the moon much more quickly than government controlled NASA had done.
Bull! Roads were paved with public funds for the public benefit. Schools, police/fire, etc.. all paid for by public funds for the welfare and benefit of the public. It's not socialism, it's socialist ideals in a capitalist environment. Private enterprise would never have ventured into space, as there's no profit motive or incentive. The only reason that virgin mobile dude has created a space flight for citizens is because he wanted so desperately to go himself. And it's largely a fiscal failure.
Drumsinhisheart wrote:The incentive to gain, to produce wealth, to better oneself will always be a more productive society than socialism, which has failed in every country it has been attempted in. Where China has succeeded it has done so at the expense of multiplied millions, now hundreds of millions, who have no freedoms or liberty or pursuit of happiness as they see fit.
History of capitalism tells a different story of slavery, servitude, employee abuse, neglect for environment, society, and everything else that doesn't equate to personal wealth and power. History tells the same story over and over, with few rare exceptions, which is why collective bargaining and regulations came into place.
China is communist, btw. Look at Denmark- Socialist, and via polling has consistently been considered the happiest country on the planet. Other social nations like sweden and other norweigan nations are also doing just fine and happy with socialist policies. Notice I stated policies. Nations don't have to be pure socialist entities to gain advantage from socialist policies and ideals.
Drumsinhisheart wrote:God forbid America becomes a socialist nation. Progressives have already ruined enough of the American dream. If Obama gets another term he will do all he can to finish the job, and America will turn into Greece, into Spain, into riots, chaos, and military on the streets of every city in America.
I think that you are correct, but not because of socialism. Those riots are happening because of austerity. The common man getting bitch-slapped over and over and over again, while the wealthy and powerful just keep getting richer and more powerful, and keep lowering their own taxes at the expense of the common man.
Did you know that in the 1950's, the tax rate on the 1% was close to 91%? Historically, in this country, the wealthy elite paid about 50% in taxes. Now most of them pay between 13-17% while the rest of us pay 27-33%. I feel like rioting too. If I had $20Mil, I'd be happy as horseshit to give $15M back to society, hell- I'd still be rich and maybe that would do some of my brothers who were'nt so fortunate some good. I've always said, the world needs janitors and garbage men.. so why don't they have a right to also work hard and make a decent living, or gain social advantages to help them make their living? I don't care if society gives to the little guy so long as he works, and most do.