This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#98539 by CraigMaxim
Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:06 pm


Rycky, that is all stupid sh*t.

Most of the quotes are just re-framed to make them appear worse than they are. Most "Presidents" have only a cursory knowledge of the inner workings of the White House, what is legally possible and what isn't. When she is suggesting something about the President's LEGAL COUNSEL, and it comes out... Department of Law.... Really? That's worth a firing squad? I think we all understand what she is saying, if we are honest, don't we? She knows that the President has a LEGAL COUNSEL, paid for by taxpayers, which give advice on what is legally tenable or not. And the President "IS" protected from many legal scenarios, "WHILE" in office. She is right about that.

Most of the ethics charges against her, were FRIVELOUS! How do you accomplish the people's work, when you are in court (and your staff too) or in meetings with State entities, being CONSTANTLY interviewed, to determine whether any of the charges have merit or not. She beat EVERY ETHICS CHARGE I believe, but one. And that one even, was minor, and no real sanction was imposed, I think, just some advice given... "In the future..."

Contrast that with someone from the higher intelligence liberal state that Barney Frank represents, who had a male lover, running a PROSTITUTION RING from the SENATOR'S OWN HOUSE, and was using OFFICIAL STATIONARY to accomplish other plots, and the Senator HIMSELF, had unethically used his position, to GET EMPLOYMENT for his lover, for STATE JOBS he was WOEFULLY UNQUALIFIED FOR!!!

Did he lose his position? The liberal dumbasses elected him AGAIN!

But you want to spit on Palin?

What the f*ck is wrong with you?

Look in your heart, and see what sexist demons allow that scenario.

Please, please... when you do spit on a woman.

Just let me be around when you do it.


#98541 by Dewy
Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:12 pm
I do not call ignorance Treachery... but I call it out when I see it. GWB and Palin have said and done very IGNORANT things, and neither were EVER qualified in my opinion to be an elected official, but I hold "Public Servants" above the official standards and many fail to qualify.

I agree to some degree that Beck and Limbaugh have a right to free speech to a point. But past that point (which they have crossed many times) they are closer to shouting fire in a crowded theater than "freely speaking".

There should be some standard set to call out "misleading statements" that have been made publicly and have the people who made the statement either retract or defend the statement.

If this was the case more people would think about what they say before they say it... which used to be a golden rule. Apparently with that out the window "Conservative Talking heads" are free to talk about a Utopia that has never existed which has been destroyed by socialist democrats who should be hunted by Fox News constituents... led by Dick Cheney loaded for partridge.

#98554 by ryckykay86
Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:17 pm
CraigMaxim wrote:

Rycky, that is all stupid sh*t.

Most of the quotes are just re-framed to make them appear worse than they are. Most "Presidents" have only a cursory knowledge of the inner workings of the White House, what is legally possible and what isn't. When she is suggesting something about the President's LEGAL COUNSEL, and it comes out... Department of Law.... Really? That's worth a firing squad? I think we all understand what she is saying, if we are honest, don't we? She knows that the President has a LEGAL COUNSEL, paid for by taxpayers, which give advice on what is legally tenable or not. And the President "IS" protected from many legal scenarios, "WHILE" in office. She is right about that.

Most of the ethics charges against her, were FRIVELOUS! How do you accomplish the people's work, when you are in court (and your staff too) or in meetings with State entities, being CONSTANTLY interviewed, to determine whether any of the charges have merit or not. She beat EVERY ETHICS CHARGE I believe, but one. And that one even, was minor, and no real sanction was imposed, I think, just some advice given... "In the future..."

Contrast that with someone from the higher intelligence liberal state that Barney Frank represents, who had a male lover, running a PROSTITUTION RING from the SENATOR'S OWN HOUSE, and was using OFFICIAL STATIONARY to accomplish other plots, and the Senator HIMSELF, had unethically used his position, to GET EMPLOYMENT for his lover, for STATE JOBS he was WOEFULLY UNQUALIFIED FOR!!!

Did he lose his position? The liberal dumbasses elected him AGAIN!

But you want to spit on Palin?

What the f*ck is wrong with you?

Look in your heart, and see what sexist demons allow that scenario.

Please, please... when you do spit on a woman.

Just let me be around when you do it.





hahaha wtf, so because the individual i want to spit on is a woman it automatically makes me sexist. sounds like a glenn beck tactic. i think if you watch the bewilderment on her face when she makes these statements you'll see that she's actually just talking out of her nice a**. i would venture to say that most vice presidential candidate at least know what their main function would be. o and if i ever spit on someone i'll try to film it and mail it to with a google image of my house so you can come find me. palin is woefully unqualified for her attempted state job. look at you pointing your finger, no one said we were of a higher intelligence, granted i feel we are less likely to back morons or religons. and so what if the guy loves man hole. but i will agree there should have been serious repurcussions for his deeds.

#98558 by fisherman bob
Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:29 pm
First of all Palin hasn't said whether she's running for Pres or not. Second, she QUIT as governor. I think that'll do her in for any chance to win the Presidency. People, whether they like her or not, DO NOT LIKE QUITTERS. The perception among many Americans, both Democrat and REpublican, both conservative and liberal, is that SHE IS A QUITTER. I for one would not vote for her based on that one fact, regardless of her politics. It's an absolute shame that Newt Gingrich has a bunch of negative baggage. He's one of the smartest people anywhere and we need somebody with his brainpower in office. My father who is a staunch Democrat even concedes that Newt would make a good President based on his intelligence. I don't know who else out there on the Republican/conservative side would make a good candidate right now. I think Palin for PRes is a moot topic IMO...

#98562 by ryckykay86
Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:43 pm
fisherman bob wrote:First of all Palin hasn't said whether she's running for Pres or not. Second, she QUIT as governor. I think that'll do her in for any chance to win the Presidency. People, whether they like her or not, DO NOT LIKE QUITTERS. The perception among many Americans, both Democrat and REpublican, both conservative and liberal, is that SHE IS A QUITTER. I for one would not vote for her based on that one fact, regardless of her politics. It's an absolute shame that Newt Gingrich has a bunch of negative baggage. He's one of the smartest people anywhere and we need somebody with his brainpower in office. My father who is a staunch Democrat even concedes that Newt would make a good President based on his intelligence. I don't know who else out there on the Republican/conservative side would make a good candidate right now. I think Palin for PRes is a moot topic IMO...


dude i totally agree, i've long thought newt would make a good president.

#98570 by CraigMaxim
Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:35 pm
ryckykay86 wrote:

hahaha wtf, so because the individual i want to spit on is a woman it automatically makes me sexist.


No. You may very well be an equal opportunity asshole. Perhaps you enjoy degrading any sex, willing to allow you to victimize them? Didn't you share awhile back, that you punched (or tried to) someone for mocking John Lennon's murder? Violence is forthcoming from you, simply because they make "statements" that you disagree with?

But you ARE a sexist.

You know you are. And the unfortunate women who have crossed your path, know it all too intimately, as well.

#98572 by CraigMaxim
Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:44 pm
ryckykay86 wrote:

o and if i ever spit on someone i'll try to film it and mail it to with a google image of my house so you can come find me.



I don't play tough over the INTERNET for asswipes like you.

You just treat people like common trash, because your ego tells you, that you are BETTER than others, and you believe that delusion, while living a selfish existence and breathing our air, though you contribute little to society for the privilege. There are FAR WORSE people than you. If I were to pay for a bus ticket, I would make it count. You aren't worth the effort. Plus, something "after the fact" means little. I need it to happen IN FRONT OF ME, so I can legally claim defense of the woman, in the face of your violent act against her.

I told you what I told you, so you would understand how your sexist/violent comments offend a real man. And also, that you might understand, that one day, you will do something that offensive and degrading in front of a real man. And when you are unfortunate enough to do that, it won't be a pleasant day for you.

There are REAL MEN in the world, who still respect women, and were raised to protect them, and honor them.

Your daddy, if you knew him, apparently DID NOT raise you with those values. But there are plenty of us out here, WHO WERE raised with such values, and instill them in our own children, so that the selfishness in this world does not deteriorate to the point, that society has lost ALL COMMON DECENCY, which prevents us from living, merely as animals.

#98573 by philbymon
Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:49 pm
EASY, big fella!

I think he's just talkin' trash, man...don't take it personal.

#98590 by CraigMaxim
Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:07 am
philbymon wrote:EASY, big fella!

I think he's just talkin' trash, man...don't take it personal.



It "IS" personal to me Phil.

I was a controlling asshole in my first marriage, well over 20 years ago now, and when it drove her away and ruined my marriage, I WOKE UP and took responsibility, and told myself... "I am NOT the good person I thought I was... but it doesn't mean that I cannot WORK from this day forward, to BECOME that person."

And every year, every month, every week, every DAY, since that time... I have done just that. Worked to redeem myself, and become a person of true value, who was decent and honest (about myself - I've always been an exceedingly honest person) and to be someone who unselfishly lived for others, more than myself.

While sadly, it served her no benefit, my first wife changed my life FOREVER.

She is still, and will remain, the biggest regret of my life.

People who know the kind of person I am now, always ask me: "Why don't you look her up and tell her how you feel about everything, and how you changed because of it?"

And the answer is...

Being TRULY REPENTFUL, means that "I ALONE" CARRY THIS BAGGAGE!"

She is remarried with beautiful kids and a wonderful family by now, and finding her just to communicate with her, is an act that serves MY NEEDS, for forgiveness, or closure, and really does VERY LITTLE GOOD for her, and potentially, just brings up heartache, she has long ago, gotten over already.

It was MY MISTAKE and "I" HAVE TO LIVE WITH MY OWN FAILURES!

#98594 by philbymon
Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:14 am
.........
Last edited by philbymon on Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

#98824 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:24 am
DEWY, You must be one of those radicals that honors mass murderers. mao,stallin , hitler, guerrera, castro, pol pot, you are a progressive,,, even if you have to murder babies to get your will done. AND YOU THINK YOU CAN SHUT >>> ME UP.
WRONG.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#98830 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:00 am
I read sh*t like this from people like you and all I think is you want control.
Then I feel sad because I realize the stupidity of the the masses.
No wonder it is so easy to become KING.
BECK did NOT have a Christmas ornament of mao tse tung hanging on his Christmas tree. Our president DID. You wanna keep singing your radical ,progressive truth. Give it up before you wind up in jail for treason , and violation of MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
You are not a democrat or a liberal,,,, You are way beyond that ,and your lies are very dangerous.

#98832 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:03 am
Dewy you are so coooooool with your agree to some degree,,, then you go and stab the knife in deeply .
WAKE THE f**k UP!!!!!!!!

#98834 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:18 am
Dewy. What do you want to do next with your progressiv thinking?
Should our govt seize ALL personal property,business,and redistribute it?
This has all been done before,,,, and all it ever ended up in was MASS DEATH AND MASS MURDER.
And people call it PROGRESSIVE.
You dont have a clue as to how strong and how many people are just like me.
Just keep pushing and believing these lies.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests