This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#264797 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Sat Aug 27, 2016 6:08 am
Deadguitars wrote:
yod wrote: Some people are hosses and some people are bosses. It's human nature that I accepted decades ago.



I agree
I see mysef as a sideman not a frontman and when people have roles I think it works best
Many people dont have the ego that lends to playing second fiddle
I hate being in the limelight so it works good

" Together More or Less in Line " is how our 9 year old cover band governs iteslf
One guy takes care of the cash ;one guy books ;one guy makes the set lists
squabbles happen we've all quit the band and indeed I missed 3 months this summer
7pc band lots of moving parts and egos




sounds quite democratic



Guys like Yod - people who hire musicians - are awesome btw



you are SO hired the next time I go to PA! :P
#264826 by Displaced Pianist
Sat Aug 27, 2016 4:48 pm
Planetguy wrote:and the worst...the biggest tell to run from? every band that i played w that had someone's name as the band name...
...The Joe Blow Band.....those were always the WORST. in my exp that's always proven to be living proof that someone thought the band was about THEM. and it proved to be true for every band i played in, or was hired to fill in with along those lines. a guaranfuckinteed recipe for disaster right there. (in MY exp).

Ditto--and precisely why I avoid 'dedicated' singers. Most of the time, that's a euphemism for 'someone trying to live out their fantasy at the expense of (often serious) musicians'--and who have little (or no) actual talent. They usually don't own a thing other than an old K-Pro mic and maybe a tambourine or bongos (to legitimize calling themselves 'musicians'?), but they expect you to have the very best in equipment. The ones who really are good (there are some, obviously) think it's a privilege for us to back them (or more accurately, to work for them--for little or no pay), that we were put on earth to attend to their every need. They're far worse than sax players.

Sorry 'bout your luck, Dayne, but like GuitarMike and P-guy--both of whom were trying to reveal the cold light of day--I had my doubts. But you already knew that. C'est la vie, as they say...

At this stage of my life, I avoid 'totalitarian' bands. I'm too old to be ordered around like a lackey just for the so-called thrill of playing the piano on stage (and heavin' around my hefty rig, haulin' it here and there, load in-load out, etc.). When I was much younger, I was lucky enough to always be in bands where the leader was someone I already knew and got along with well enough, and the bands were already gigging on a regular basis. It was always presented to me as 'well, you already know what we do, so if you're on board w/ it, cool...' I was a sideman and could live w/ that, maybe still could under the right circumstances. But going all in w/ a total stranger who apparently thinks I'm desperate and/or stupid enough to do whatever I'm told--not gonna happen. They always claim you'll be makin' all this money, but as Dayne's experience has shown, more often it's a lot of empty promises. Not how I'm gonna fritter away my advanced years...

I might fall in w/ a band that has a clear direction that appeals to me (i.e., R&B, funk, jazz-oriented, etc.) and have no problem putting in the time in rehearsal to get it down. Not much chance of that around these parts. A while back, I agreed to play in a band doing all originals that were...ok, I guess. I only agreed because all but one of them were going to work w/ me on a jazz-oriented thing. But a couple of weeks later, everyone had begged out of the jazz thing, so... I was born at night, but not last night.

I would play in a band w/ friends where there's a clear leader; friends always seem to know how to handle that sort of thing. And friends have similar likes and are willing to work together. Think of your own experience w/ "bosses"; some you really wanna do your best for, others you wanna kill via heinous and public torture. They always say a boss should never be a friend, but I don't buy that. I've worked for friends before and it always turned out well--we were always still friends after-the-fact. Maybe that's because they know me and know how to get the best from me. And I can accept it when they tell me, 'that ain't workin'...'

But I see things differently--I'm not all 'bout the money, and can live quite comfortably w/o ever doing another gig in my life. I gotta love what I'm doing and have a kinship w/ the folks I'm doing it with. So while bands do generally need someone to take the lead, it has the feel of a democracy. Everyone has to do their part--and be willing to give up some things--for the greater good. Alas, that's such a rare thing to find...
#264828 by J-HALEY
Sat Aug 27, 2016 4:54 pm
yod wrote:
J-HALEY wrote:The best bands I have worked with are democratic. You do have to have a good leader that can remain unbiased. This leader is one that everyone in the band looks up to and respects. One thing I will not do is play in a Joe Blow and the whatevers. That is ALWAYS a band where Joe Blow is promoting his name and to hell with everybody else. It cracks me up when one member says "It's my band" my reply is, without us other guys YOU ain't a band!



OK, now the flip side of that perspective....

I seriously believe I could have been signed to a major label in the 70s/ 80s/90s if I had not done what you just said for most of my life.

My experience is that every band would work to get to a certain level of success and then it became competing visions and agendas that broke the band up, and I would have to start all over again with new players. Once there were too many new players it had to be a new band with new songs, new recordings, new promo.....oy.

When I finally did sign, the record label didn't want the band, and they rarely do. They want the songwriter(s) because publishing is what makes the world go 'round. I had just spent 20k of my own money producing an album, getting press materials, marketing/promotion on a fantastic band....and had nothing to show for it when the band broke up. That scenario had happened at least a dozen times in my life and the only way to avoid it (again) was to go as a solo artist. Now I hire musicians when I need them, and am no longer a prisoner to their limited ability. If one guy can't pull off a solo that adds to the song, then I simply hire another guy who can. If the song calls for an oboe solo, the guitar player doesn't get a bruised ego.

The disadvantages are higher costs for musicians when I use them, but the advantages far outweigh that in the ability to do what needs to be done without being slowed down by people who have different goals.

It was the one thing that made the difference between being a local yokel and a working recording artist. So Joe Blow doesn't care what the band thinks because it's his job to make sure we're all working.


Ted, you are the exception to everything I said. We are talking two different animals here. You are talking Big Time and original. I play music for extra income basically a 2cd job as a cover band. I have and do work as the sideman, my heart is in playing good music people want to hear and can dance to. Lets face it even Jimi had to play "Mustang Sally" :lol:
#264830 by Displaced Pianist
Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:33 pm
Yep, Jook, your experience may be an exception, and there always are exceptions. Obviously, there are some good vocalists out there. If the gal you're speaking of is the one in that vid you posted...she's clearly got the pipes. You made the comment somewhere she puts ol' Jesse to shame, and I gotta agree. If you're lucky, she has her head on straight and y'all can work together; from what you describe, that's what it sounds like. Like I mentioned, everyone has to be able to do their part, and give up some things for the greater good. More often than not, that's the toughest part.
#264841 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Sat Aug 27, 2016 6:47 pm
Jook,

I can't imagine you in any band where you aren't "controlling" things. The secret (if there is one) to having all members happy is being a servant leader. One person doesn't have to make all decisions, but there has to be one vision that sets the parameters for those decisions. The Beatles were led by Lennon but he included everyone's composition and ideas in their music, so they all sensed some ownership.

Really there is no such thing as a "democratic" band. There are only benevolent monarchies or dictatorships.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests