yod wrote:...but a professional band wants to look professional. four guys in their twenties probably don't care if the lead player is 40 if he's great and can look the part. But they probably don't want fat balding old guys that can only play Skynard.
and its frustrating to go through auditioning a dozen guitar players when you could've judged them before hand much more quickly
If money is of no concern then you're a hobbyist and a professional player needs someone more dependable. There's a million good reasons to put something in your resume' if you're at BandMix, even if you aren't looking for a band.
I get you, to a point. As far as the looks thing, yeah, there are folks out there who want bandmates to have a certain look (sometimes regardless of their ability), but I don't go in for that myself. I'll take that fat old balding guy--IF he can play good jazz. Ability trumps all, in my book--this ain't a fashion show, and I'm not looking to pick up groupies.
I do have clips folks can listen to; if that doesn't give them enough to go on to set up a session (hence my question), I'm not sure what will. After all, if I gotta haul around the heaviest rig, the least they can do is take an hour or two and see how it sounds. In my book, the sound is the most important element.
I never said money is of "no concern"; getting paid to play is a good thing. What I object to is the notion that
Jookeyman wrote:...a musician must be a BUSINESS MAN first, a musician second.
Methinks Jook has it back-asswards. If you aren't a musician first--as far as I'm concerned, the music ALWAYS comes first--you won't need to worry about business; you won't be doing any (unless you manage the bands/musicians who DO put the music first). You can be a musician first & foremost and still make some decent money. Unless you wanna play jazz in Tampa.