This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#188896 by Slacker G
Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:49 am
Dane,

People seem to overlook what "fearless leader" said during his first campaign for president. He said this.

" We can't leave our home temp at 72 degrees or drive our SUV's and expect other countries to say OK." (2007 speech)

Ok. From another post I have seen how dense libs are in their thinking.

Put that together with the 1% and you can see (well maybe the libs can't) that he was referring to "THEM" not US as the 99%. More clarification for the libs...

He wants us to live just like his brother.... in a mud hut scrounging for food on the dollar a week we earn. That is his idea of sharing the wealth. The poor in America have more than one TV, they have more than one car in a many instances, they live in a climate controlled environment (HOUSE for you libs) , they get a fat subsidy check from the gov just for being poor, they get fed just for being poor and on and on and on...

The point is that he wants all of us to be equal. That's what he implies in almost every speech. He just omits the part about us living like they do, not them living as we do. In other words, the poor that he always stands up for (in word only) HAVE TOO MUCH!! They need to share with all those in REAL poverty, all the nations in the world. The people sleeping in the jungles, the people starving in North Korea, and in China, and in every other poverty ridden hell hole on this earth.

He needs to bring us down in order to do that. He needs to take away our jobs, he needs to kill our manufacturing, he needs to make us energy destitute, he needs to ruin our dollar and make it worthless. He wants to take away your property rights, he wants to take away your health care, he wants to control your food supplies. Need I go on?

Naaaaaaaaaaaa piss away your votes. Keep this guy in office. This guy is going the right direction, at least for a wanna be dictator.

#188899 by Mike Nobody
Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:01 am
"HE TOOK ERRR JERBS!" - Slacker :lol:

#188943 by Drumsinhisheart
Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:58 pm
"Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age.

Obama's inaugural address, first thing to see at the above link.

New age. Indeed. New World Order. Globalist tyranny. One big happy village.

#188946 by Drumsinhisheart
Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:03 pm
Since when does POTUS get to decide what "greed" is? Since when does anyone get to decide what greed is for anyone else? Define "greed." At what dollar amount do we begin to employ this world socialist definition?

This Marxist can take his "collective failures" back to Chicago in a few weeks.

#188947 by J-HALEY
Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:04 pm
Benjamin M Johnson wrote:
Slacker G wrote:People seem to overlook what "fearless leader" said during his first campaign for president. He said this.

" We can't leave our home temp at 72 degrees or drive our SUV's and expect other countries to say OK." (2007 speech)

I did a search and found a number of variations on that quote online, mostly on far right-leaning sites, but I can't find an original source or full transcript from the speech anywhere. Just for curiosity, does anyone have a link?


I don't need a link. I watched the words come out of his piehole! :P

#189098 by Kramerguy
Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:17 pm
yeah, I saw him laughing all evil-like, and joking about how he fooled america, he said he doesn't even have a birth certificate, and that he wants to take away everyones guns and nuke brazil. I saw it and heard him say it- with my own two eyes and two ears, I did!

#189099 by Kramerguy
Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:19 pm
Drumsinhisheart wrote:Since when does POTUS get to decide what "greed" is? Since when does anyone get to decide what greed is for anyone else? Define "greed." At what dollar amount do we begin to employ this world socialist definition?

This Marxist can take his "collective failures" back to Chicago in a few weeks.


I think no matter what he (or anyone) says, someone will find a way to deconstruct a sentence and twist it to mean whatever they want. Just look at what they've interpreted the constitution into....

#189157 by Kramerguy
Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:18 pm
good point.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests