This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#104760 by gbheil
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:21 am
It is silly. And irrelevant.

I did not attend my "prom" because it was disco.
I should have sued because I chose to rock and they would not let me.
Attributing discriminatory constitutionality to a chosen behavior is just stupid.
And I personally am quite sick of all the false claims that somehow sexually deviant behaviors should be "justifiable by law".
Total bullshyt.
Perversion is perversion.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.


Let her take her two year old date to the prom.
Viva la pedophiles !! :roll:

#104765 by Cretindilettante
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:36 am
sanshouheil wrote:It is silly. And irrelevant.

I did not attend my "prom" because it was disco.
I should have sued because I chose to rock and they would not let me.
Attributing discriminatory constitutionality to a chosen behavior is just stupid.
And I personally am quite sick of all the false claims that somehow sexually deviant behaviors should be "justifiable by law".
Total bullshyt.
Perversion is perversion.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.


Let her take her two year old date to the prom.
Viva la pedophiles !! :roll:


You are possibly the dumbest person I have ever encountered on the internet. You're worse at arguing than Craig is, holy sh*t. Where does your logic hold up all homosexuals being pedophiles? Just because a book written by men that claim to have been inspired by God said Gays are evil doesn't make it true. Would you believe me if I told you that God had come to me and inspired me to write the new word of God if I published it? Probably not. So why would you believe that the people whom wrote the Bible were channeling God?

#104766 by gbheil
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:42 am
:lol:

#104767 by gbheil
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:43 am
I smell something burning. :lol:

#104768 by Starfish Scott
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:50 am
LOL Cretin you think the world is going to change because you think so?

Right or wrong everyone has the right to believe what they like.

AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT<YOU KNOW WHAT YOU CAN DO, right?

You can lump it.

Tough Nuggies, lil cretin..better luck throwing your weight around next time.

If you are to perform ever in anything, I suggest you grow a thick skin else the world will eat you alive..

#104778 by Cretindilettante
Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:50 am
Capt. Scott wrote:LOL Cretin you think the world is going to change because you think so?

Right or wrong everyone has the right to believe what they like.

AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT<YOU KNOW WHAT YOU CAN DO, right?

You can lump it.

Tough Nuggies, lil cretin..better luck throwing your weight around next time.

If you are to perform ever in anything, I suggest you grow a thick skin else the world will eat you alive..


Having thick skin doesn't entail tolerating idiocy or ignorance. :roll:

#104785 by gbheil
Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:55 am
Ignoring simple facts of natural science ... must be a whole nother matter eh?

#104799 by Hayden King
Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:12 pm
I have to go w/the girl...guy.. whatever it is. It was pretty lame for the school to try to "hide it under the blanket" so to speak. In a "free" society "all" have the right to "individual freedom"!
Doesn't matter if everyone else agrees with what you believe in. That's the whole point

"we are all one" .... like it or not!

#104819 by Starfish Scott
Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:36 pm
Where is my can of "Biaaatch Be Gone">?.. LOL

(spray-spray)

Whatcha going to do, ya lil dilettante?

NOTHING, that's what you're going to do.
Last edited by Starfish Scott on Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

#104831 by Dewy
Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:17 pm
Determining the constitutionality of BOTH issues are HUGE matters.

Not really... both are no brainer's, as proof I offer as evidence, you resolved the gay thing yourself. They violated her rights... give her a buck and move on.

Same with the Constitutionality of the Federal Mandate on individuals to purchase insurance. This came up in 1994 when Sen. Grassley offered in response to "HillaryCare". Dems asked "is that Constitutional?" Repubs showed several clauses and pointed out exceptions and exclusions, and the argument was over.

Now, Experts and even the pundits on Fox news agree, there are enough exclusions and subsidies that no one will have their rights "abridged". Repubs are arguing its "forcing us to purchase a commercial product", Dems counter that to govern insurances impact across state lines its necessary.

Its a modified argument that Repubs took to the Supreme court vs Social Security and lost. But hey... it didn't stop them from tying up the courts time... that was 1937, fast forward to 2010... same cause, same opponents, different results this time?

Unlikely anything will change. Except... well every other time Dems did the "right" thing, Social Security, Medicare/ Medicade/ Unemployment Compensation, Civil Rights, and attempts at Health care Reform... they have paid the price for it in the next election. Cleverly ran campaigns painted the "progress" and evil, or immoral... and by God they were gonna repeal it. But they never did...

This time it is a little different. This time Repubs have to paint the progress in the information age, with more informed citizens than ever before.

Also this time, the results have been described as "Armageddon" and Catastrophic... so when they obviously are not... that could be hard to campaign on.

As well we must consider that Tea Party's are proving to be a burdensome for the Repubs as for dems. They have the ability to divide the Republicans and could actually have the reverse of the intended effect.

I sincerely do not think ANYONE, Dem, Repub, Lib or Teabagger wants to see this nation fail. So it is unthinkable to me that:
Dems voted in a plan that will fail completely.
Repubs voted in the Prescription bill that failed completely.
Anyone thinks Sarah Palin is presidential material.
GlenJ would acknowledge his utter failure at predicting the stock market's response and cease to call ME ignorant.

#104852 by Cretindilettante
Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:21 pm
Capt. Scott wrote:Where is my can of "Biaaatch Be Gone">?.. LOL

(spray-spray)

Whatcha going to do, ya lil dilettante?

NOTHING, that's what your are going to do.

Of course I can't do anything about it, and I don't plan on it. I will let you both stay stupid and ignorant, because while you guys are busy talking about fags, heretics, and liberal scum I will be doing something productive. You seem to think that you can make me "mad" or impact me in any way by making stupid statements, but in reality your idiocy merely amuses me.

People that condemn homosexuals are just as foolish as white nationalists. You hate on something else to make you forget that you have accomplished nothing with your life, or perhaps to make you forget that you hate yourself. The white nationalists brag about how White people built everything in society while they themselves act like trailer trash with no real direction. The gay bashers harass and attack homosexuals because it makes them feel a part of something. It's that whole "Us vs. Them" mentality. You blame gays for pedophilia, AIDS, Feminism, etc without anything to base your arguments on aside from a book written by Bronze age men because you are insecure with yourself. In fact, most religious people in America are very fearful, insecure, and ignorant. I have not met a single one that could rationalize their beliefs without committing a logical fallacy based on emotion, or a strawman of the opposing argument.

#105004 by Starfish Scott
Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:03 pm
Oh you co0nvinced us all.

Can we go for donuts and coffee now?

#105071 by philbymon
Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:39 pm
Hmmm, I've looked & looked at this thread. I've seen references to Rosa Parks, early on, while I'm told by some that this is irrelevent.

I suppose Rosa Parks was just mad about a seat on the bus. When you put it that way, it certainly seems irrelevent.

#106787 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:02 am
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/04/miss-lesbian-attends--fake-prom-as-classmates-party-in-secret/1

USA Today
Apr 06, 2010
Miss. lesbian attends 'fake prom' as classmates party in secret


Image

Constance McMillen finally attended her senior prom Friday at a country club in Fulton, Miss. But the 18-year-old lesbian who has been in the news says she was duped into attending a "fake prom" while her classmates — with the help of parents — secretly partied elsewhere.


"They had two proms and I was only invited to one of them," McMillen told The Advocate, a national gay-and-lesbian publication. "The one that I went to had seven people there, and everyone went to the other one I wasn't invited to."

Last month, the Itawamba County School District refused to allow McMillen to bring a female date to her high school prom and then canceled the event. She went to federal court, and a judge ruled the district had violated her civil rights. But he did not order the district to hold the prom, because a parent-sponsored event was being scheduled away from the school. McMillen said organizers would not give her details, finally telling her to go to the country club Friday night.


Besides McMillen and her date, the other attendees included two students with learning difficulties.

"They had the time of their lives," McMillen told The Advocate. "That's the one good thing that come out of this, [these kids] didn't have to worry about people making fun of them."

#106792 by philbymon
Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:16 am
Oh, now there's an unfortunate headline..."Miss Lesbian"...LOL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests