Craig before I deconstruct your last post I have to let you in on something: condescending to people who simply disagree with your view as "non brilliant" won't get you anywhere. It's a cheap tactic I did not expect from you. Try to keep this exchange adult, ok?
Also, you don't need to go prying too far into my closet for skeletons. I trot them out all the time. And sins? What sins? Since I don't believe in sin, that comment sort of rolled of the ol' back as the saying goes.
The anger leveled at the Bush Reich and its tentacles is not irrational in the least. It is entirely rational and justified. They have taken our nationa and rolled it in the dung between the tracks. They have trashed our constitution, trampled on some of our dearest principles, mocked the best parts of our system, put in place economic policies that have played a big part in our deteriorating economy, and made wars of aggression on people who never wronged us. You can't get much worse than that, so let's not have any handwringing for the way some of us react.
And to boot, there is no evidence whatsoever that just because we have not had another domestic attack on home soil since 2001, that BushCo stopped anything at all. For all you know, they are still planning a biggie. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. So no, I won't credit him with something that cannot even be proven.
As for the charges I leveled against Condasleeza Reich, for which you wanted to see a source, here it is. It's from reporter Scot Paltrow, who writes for that well known leftwing rag THE WALLSTREET JOURNAL -
"In the aftermath of those attacks, Bush administration officials have said they received no intelligence warning of such a tactic. "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said in a May 2002 news briefing.
Yet on several occasions starting in the mid-1990s, U.S. intelligence agencies had passed on information concerning such a possibility, including early plans by al Qaeda officials to use passenger jets as kamikaze weapons, according to records and current and former government officials."
whole article here
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB107991342102561383.html
Condasleeza is perfect fit for her boss's regime...dishonest, shifty, quick with the tongue but short on facts and the truth. I look forward to her retirement from public life after January 2009.
Also, you don't need to go prying too far into my closet for skeletons. I trot them out all the time. And sins? What sins? Since I don't believe in sin, that comment sort of rolled of the ol' back as the saying goes.
The anger leveled at the Bush Reich and its tentacles is not irrational in the least. It is entirely rational and justified. They have taken our nationa and rolled it in the dung between the tracks. They have trashed our constitution, trampled on some of our dearest principles, mocked the best parts of our system, put in place economic policies that have played a big part in our deteriorating economy, and made wars of aggression on people who never wronged us. You can't get much worse than that, so let's not have any handwringing for the way some of us react.
And to boot, there is no evidence whatsoever that just because we have not had another domestic attack on home soil since 2001, that BushCo stopped anything at all. For all you know, they are still planning a biggie. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. So no, I won't credit him with something that cannot even be proven.
As for the charges I leveled against Condasleeza Reich, for which you wanted to see a source, here it is. It's from reporter Scot Paltrow, who writes for that well known leftwing rag THE WALLSTREET JOURNAL -
"In the aftermath of those attacks, Bush administration officials have said they received no intelligence warning of such a tactic. "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said in a May 2002 news briefing.
Yet on several occasions starting in the mid-1990s, U.S. intelligence agencies had passed on information concerning such a possibility, including early plans by al Qaeda officials to use passenger jets as kamikaze weapons, according to records and current and former government officials."
whole article here
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB107991342102561383.html
Condasleeza is perfect fit for her boss's regime...dishonest, shifty, quick with the tongue but short on facts and the truth. I look forward to her retirement from public life after January 2009.