This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#96075 by Sir Jamsalot
Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:26 pm
Dajax wrote:I've only got one thing to say about this video...WHO CARES! I'll take the cool, unsafe car any day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPF4fBGN ... re=related


I'd like to see that test with 2009 Chevy Malibu v 2009 Chevy Malibu ... The only reason the 2009 chevy malibu took so comparitively less damage was because the bell air crumpled, imo. But what do i know?

#96098 by HowlinJ
Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:29 am
I'm with you,Dajax!
Back around '66, my drummer at the time taught me how to drive "stick" in one of these old unsafe bombs! (I'm still around to tell about it :wink: )

http://www.2blowhards.com/Corvette%20-%2058.jpg

#96103 by gbheil
Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:53 am
Kind of a surprising result to me.
I had a head on in a 1972 (best I remember) Pontiac Le Mans.
After we pried the two vehicles apart. I drove my Le Mans home.
Like to see them do that with one of these little sardine cans.

#96136 by philbymon
Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:28 pm
Okay, that was a fun video.

Now, let's make another one. This time, let's see the diference in cost for the results of an accident at, say, 5 miles per hour. NOW which car is the better one?

Frankly, I don't expect to live through a head-on collision in EITHER car, & I really don't wanna survive as either a vegie or a para- or quadroplegic at the mercies of others for the rest of my natural life. I DO expect to have one of those little annoying things happen at 5 mph.

SO - which car should I prefer?

I rode in a friend's Buick for over 6 hours yesterday. The panel of buttons on the door alone in that damned thing look like they came straight from the frikken space shuttle. Took me a bit to figure out how to open the damned window. Then there were the climate controls. The windshield washer fluid was beyond my son to find. There was a lil multi-switch there for your seat adjustment, but we couldn't find the damned switch for the side-view mirrors. You need a damned owner's manual to drive this frikken car a mile to the local 7-11! Gimme the older, safer car.

I said safer. Yep. Cuz while you're popping all those damned buttons looking to do something, you're hitting someone from behind in your confusion. If the learning curve is too shallow for any given automobile, it's simply too damned complicated to be on the road.

The average age of a Buick owner is 72. The average age for a Lincoln owner is 68. Do we REALLY want these old folks driving these complicated thingies? Thier eyes are bad. Thier reaction time is slowed. They cannot multitask as well as they used to. Would any of us put your average 70 yr old behind the wheel of a space shuttle?

I DON'T THINK SO!

#96138 by gbheil
Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:32 pm
LOL

I cant say I've ever seen a 70 year old driving and texting or talking on their damned cell phone.
Give me slow reflexes with experience over some thoughtless twit whom cares more about their social life than the safety of their fellow man.

#96148 by philbymon
Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:20 pm
Well thank heavens that group doesn't statistically drive a Buick or a Lincoln! How many distractions can ppl handle?

Technology, far as I can tell, is NOT making our lives "simpler."

Remember when you only had to dial 4 numbers to call your neighbor? I do. Now, of course, you must dial TEN digits to call next door, but at least they're push-buttons now, right? And once you set up your speed dial, you only need one!

Never tried an atl-atl, but I'm fairly good with a bow & a gun. Gimme one of these damned space cars, though, & it just frustrates me. I just wanna drive, dammit, not have a convo or a wrestling match with a machine.

There was an old woman who had a new Buick around here, about 20 yrs ago. The electrical system went out in her car as she turned it off in her driveway. It was summer. She couldn't unlock the doors or open the windows, & she cooked to death in her own driveway. If she'd had a cell phone, she could have survived, right? Of course, if she'd had window cranks, she would have, as well!

I've learned to use a foot-adz & a broad axe to square up logs, as well as a chain saw. The hand tools give a much better appearance, & don't really take that much longer to use, either, while you get a bit of a workout. The more techno we use, the fatter we get. The dumber we get, too. And our land fills get fuller, too, as we toss old technologies away & replace them with the new.

Our technologies may kill us in the end, rather than save us, imho.

Science ain't all that, in spite of what the pseudo-hippies think. Every damned thing we invent causes another ecological problem, or a moral problem, or dumbs us down in some way, or complicates our already over-complicated lives.

I do like my 'puter, though.

:wink:

#96150 by gbheil
Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:32 pm
Yep.

And thank God vacuum tubes are old tech too. 8)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests