http://www.examiner.com/a-1031230~D_C__DMV_to_build_SmarTrip_chips_into_driver_s_licenses.html?cid=temp-local-more
http://www.pcworld.com/article/122537/smart_id_cards_debated.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act
EDITED: Correction I was mistaken, it’s not contactless, that’s the EDL, the Real ID ones require a reader. Although I still firmly believe this it is only a matter of time before where eventually a cop can cruise by you as you’re walking along the street and scan all your info. The technology is already available.
Sentient that is an excellent point. Crime free? Certainly not, but it has more to do with presence then it does punishment. In the Nazi scenario, brutality was an increase on the punishment side and of course they had great deal of presence, through manpower and intelligence. Making them extremely effective for keeping the peace. The question is do you think the Nazis minded brutality, if it furthered along their own popular sentiments? Our problem is aggression of any kind is absolutely intolerable, so every time it occurs further controls need to be put in place to prevent it, bloating an already crippled system. Since there is a necessary balance of punishment and presence for any law enforcement to work at all, in order to increase results, we will have to rely more and more on presence. Meaning it doesn’t matter what happens “if I get caught”, as long as I know for sure, “I’m going to get caught”.
For example, Hayden’s post about being to drunk to drive and being driven home. But that discretion has since been removed, since many areas require an offense to be filed anytime an officer pulls someone over. Which is a control measure, no doubt to “prevent” stuff like DUI fishing. Both the guy fishing for a DUI and the one nice enough to drive you home without reporting it, are rogues working outside the system. I would imagine the one fishing for DUIs would encounter a LOT less trouble, than the one driving you home would if they were found out, because of the popular sentiment towards drunk driving. But which one is actually trespassing against your civil rights? The officer doing his random DUI checks is stopping you without any reasonable suspicion at all. Once again that’s deemed ok, because it faults on the side of safety and a drunk driver is considered an outcast publicly held with the same esteem, as maybe child molesters and rapists.
Hey Sans so how about that public intoxication clause in your state? Does that still remain unchanged after those six cops abused it to bolster their arrest quotas?





