This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

General discussion for non music topics. BE RESPECTFUL OR YOUR POSTS WILL BE DELETED.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#295188 by Badstrat
Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:55 pm
This is pretty scary.

100 million will die by 2030 if world fails to act on climate: report
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-clim ... HG20120925

LONDON (Reuters) - More than 100 million people will die and global economic growth will be cut by 3.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030 if the world fails to tackle climate change, a report commissioned by 20 governments said on Wednesday.

As global average temperatures rise due to greenhouse gas emissions, (including exhaling?) the effects on the planet, such as melting ice caps, extreme weather, drought and rising sea levels, will threaten populations and livelihoods, said the report conducted by humanitarian organization DARA.

It calculated that five million deaths occur each year from air pollution, hunger and disease as a result of climate change and carbon-intensive economies, and that toll would likely rise to six million a year by 2030 if current patterns of fossil fuel use continue.

......

100 million will die due to "Climate Change." That article was first published in September 25, 2012 / 6:06 PM / 7 years ago. It should be obvious to everyone that they have been hiding the deaths of the millions of those who have died directly due to Climate Change during the years between 2012 and 2019. Are they falsifying "death due to Climate Change" data on coroners reports and deliberately hiding that data from Pravda? Are they doing that to avoid world-wide panic? I'm sure that they do not wish to alarm us. But still the "Were all going to die Chicken Little Syndrome" is almost, or rather is, a staple of nightly Pravda every time we have a warm or cold spell. Perhaps the link below will help calm the fears of some Chicken Little "The Sky is Falling" proponents.

A Video Gift To Climate Alarmists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8455KED ... e=emb_logo
#295192 by GuitarMikeB
Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:11 pm
The article says 5 million people die every year from climate-change-related causes (such as air pollution). How can you refute that? Over 55 million people die every year around the world.
#295194 by Badstrat
Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:09 am
GuitarMikeB wrote:The article says 5 million people die every year from climate-change-related causes (such as air pollution). How can you refute that? Over 55 million people die every year around the world.


Pollution is not "climate change" . Naturally your facts are easy to refute. No cause of death directly related to climate change isn't a death due to climate change. Where are all the death certificates that specifically define the deaths as due to climate change. Those stats are as fabricated as the phony computer programmed "hockey stick" which is said to be the most controversial graph in science history which incidentally has little to do with any facts.
The only thing real about man caused climate change is the billions that the con men, scammers artists and politicians are carting away in gunny sacks.
#295196 by Mordgeld
Thu Jan 09, 2020 6:18 pm
Badstrat wrote:
GuitarMikeB wrote:The article says 5 million people die every year from climate-change-related causes (such as air pollution). How can you refute that? Over 55 million people die every year around the world.


Pollution is not "climate change" . Naturally your facts are easy to refute. No cause of death directly related to climate change isn't a death due to climate change. Where are all the death certificates that specifically define the deaths as due to climate change. Those stats are as fabricated as the phony computer programmed "hockey stick" which is said to be the most controversial graph in science history which incidentally has little to do with any facts.
The only thing real about man caused climate change is the billions that the con men, scammers artists and politicians are carting away in gunny sacks.


Pollution can definitely change your local climate. California even receives some of the effects of the pollution occurring in China. That said, "climate change" is a rather ambiguous term that seems to be generally used to imply "irreversible global catastrophic anthropomorphic climate change". It doesn't help that the very gas that all mammals breathe out and all plants take in is classed as a pollutant. Here, (Cali) this type of thinking means that we have only coal plants providing the bulk of our power. While coal technology is much cleaner than it used to be, the reason we are beating the Euro people on emissions targets is because of the resurgence of natural gas for power plants and Europe's abandonment of nuclear power. The surplus of natural gas comes from fracking technology. No fracking or nuclear happening in California because pollution or something. I think that the politicians and scammers are targeting the useful idiots that (willfully?) don't understand the discussion (what realistically works, can we afford/improve it?) on how to have a properly functioning modern society. I must say that having week-long power outages should be an object lesson for all the pious folks in their heavily subsidized electric vehicles.
#295197 by Badstrat
Fri Jan 10, 2020 4:38 pm
The earth was designed to wear out like a garment said the creator of the universe. He also said that the earth will be destroyed by fire. "The day of the Lord will come as a robber comes. The heavens will pass away with a loud noise. The sun and moon and stars will burn up. The earth and all that is in it will be burned up".

Perhaps nuclear devastation will destroy us long before any man made pollution. Has the "climate change" to other planets in our solar system been attributed to mans pollution? They are also changing. Naturally I do not assume that those who deny a creator could comprehend this.

To those who have been programmed to believe in the "climate change" fraud there is little hope of revealing the truth. The simple way to expose fraud is to follow the money and consider who has the most to gain. The end goal of "climate change" is the domination all mankind by a few. Yet convincing a climate change believer is like trying to describe the color blue to a blind man.

The fact that the earth has gone through radical changes since it was formed should indicate that man is not the cause. Man is as a piss-ant within the galaxy as far as climate change is concerned. When the scam is complete the eyes of many will be opened, but it will be too late.

Regardless pollution is not "Climate Change" Pollution is not weather. Pollution is something that causes impurity in a substance such as water, air, gold etc. Even if pollution could cause "Climate change" it is not "climate change" in itself.
........
cli·mate
/ˈklīmit/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: climate; plural noun: climates

the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.
"our cold, wet climate"
h
Similar:
weather pattern
weather conditions
weather
atmospheric conditions
a region with particular prevailing weather conditions.
"vacationing in a warm climate"

the prevailing trend of public opinion or of another aspect of public life.
"the current economic climate"
#295198 by Mordgeld
Fri Jan 10, 2020 6:16 pm
Badstrat wrote:...Regardless pollution is not "Climate Change" Pollution is not weather. Pollution is something that causes impurity in a substance such as water, air, gold etc. Even if pollution could cause "Climate change" it is not "climate change" in itself.
........
cli·mate
/ˈklīmit/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: climate; plural noun: climates

the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.
"our cold, wet climate"
h
Similar:
weather pattern
weather conditions
weather
atmospheric conditions
a region with particular prevailing weather conditions.
"vacationing in a warm climate"

the prevailing trend of public opinion or of another aspect of public life.
"the current economic climate"


The prevailing weather (climate) conditions in a given general area is literally what everyone is telling you about here. I just posted a picture illustrating a climate around a city negatively influenced (changed) by pollution. Whether this is a local or a global issue is still open to debate. I do not know where they get the numbers for deaths/year. We add almost a billion people/decade in population so this number should increase in proportionally with some lag over one generation. Also, some people live in climates and areas that are naturally very hostile to begin with and it is not clear if those deaths are part of the figures. It reminds me of the "gun violence" figures that include lawful defense and suicides. Is it statistics or damn lies packaged as statistics; hard to tell sometimes without finding the fine-print.

Anyway, who is saying that pollution is climate change or weather so that you have to define it?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests