“this group is f*#ked George. you might as well go argue politics with the animals at your local petting zoo.
”
What can one say about politics to someone to who voted for a traitor like McCain ? Could he truly have any political understanding?
Some day we will have that one payer health care system and then schmed can pat himself on the back for the rationing that must follow in any socialist single payer healthcare system. By the way, “single payer healthcare” is an oxymoron. We shall all still be paying, we simply won’t get treatment.
I’ll address the fact-twisting (or should I say lying?) propagandist “pastor Pharisee” instead.
george1146561 wrote:schmedidiah wrote:Whatever his PONT was, you missed it
I suspect he was attempting to use a convoluted metaphor instead of simply clearly stating that he was getting at.
It appears he blames the President for telling Congress that it's their job to set official immigration policy through legislation instead of his job through Executive Orders as meaning that Trump is letting illegal aliens remain in the country. It appears that he is totally incapable of discerning that there might possibly be differences between certain groups of illegal aliens. In his mind, it would appear, that all illegal aliens are interchangeable and identical. That there is no difference between a wetback gang-banger with a tattooed face selling drugs and the grown child of an illegal alien who has only broken one serious law in his life, that of entering illegally. Such absolutism is understandable, but not defensible.
I could explain this with a simile, but then everyone would start nitpicking the simile. I could attempt to use a metaphor, but the overuse of metaphors instead of simple, clear text is what's causing all the missing "ponts".
The bottom line is that the title of this thread is total and complete bullshit.
First of all georgy porgy, Glen didn’t express any of the opinions YOU presented in your twisted diatribe. I say this because you begin your post referring to schmeds quote of Glens post. And then you both re quote and reply to that post with:
“I suspect HE was attempting to use a convoluted metaphor instead of simply clearly stating that he was getting at.”
Then without breaking stride you continue your diatribe of wandering propaganda by saying this.
“It appears HE blames the President for telling Congress that it's their job to set official immigration policy through legislation instead of his job through Executive Orders as meaning that Trump is letting illegal aliens remain in the country. It appears that HE is totally incapable of discerning that there might possibly be differences between certain groups of illegal aliens. In his mind, it would appear, that all illegal aliens are interchangeable and identical. That there is no difference between a wetback gang-banger with a tattooed face selling drugs and the grown child of an illegal alien who has only broken one serious law in his life, that of entering illegally.”
Well georgy porgy, Glen never stated or even implied that and neither did I
You simply twisted what I said. (as all liars do) You created the typical propagandist liberal lie. Not so? Then read what I said again. I believe that you purposely twist the words of others to bolster your ego and prop up your lame liberal positions. Didn’t I actually infer that ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE law breakers? And just who was the illegal you refer to? “an illegal alien who has only broken one serious law in his life, that of entering illegally”? Which ones? Just HOW do you know that is the only law they have broken? And how are you going to glean out from amongst them the ones who have committed other crimes and gotten away with them.
You are either a purposeful propagandist liar with intent to distort the truth or you error in your understanding due to your limited comprehension of the printed word. One or the other, georgy. The proof of that is clearly set before you within this thread. Your lack of comprehension has your post referring to things HE said while referring to the pronoun HE referring to “Glen” (as implied through the composition of your post) Things that Glen never wrote. Regardless, georgy, you desperately need to take reading comprehension classes you idiot.
Go get a friend if you have one, and ask him to read this thread from the very beginning to you. Then he can explain to you the thoughts that the words express when they are linked together in a sentence.
Look up the definitions of legal and illegal. After you learn what illegal mean then look up the immigration laws of this country and see if your anemic brain cell can comprehend what laws are being broken by those (ALL OF THOSE) who did not come here legally.
There should be no partiality of the law. When partiality is shown, lawlessness rules. But you claim to be a minister. Tell me Pharisee, does God sanction justice for one and injustice for the other? Should we break Gods laws and get away with it based on our age or on how long we have been breaking those laws? < (Rhetorical)
Perhaps your friend (if you have one) may even be kind enough to explain what it means to be lawless. That’s what you are georgy, lawless. If that were not so you would understand that immigration laws are being broken and you would not support or defend the lawlessness of those breaking our laws. When you defend lawlessness you are also lawless. Should we base judgment on age or the amount of time someone has broken the law? If an illegal alien says “But I have been here 20 years” doesn’t that simply mean he has been breaking our laws for 20 years? Should we determine that if some that are breaking the law are nicer than others should we let them get away with it? Is that how you would meld out penalties for the actions of some breaking the laws and getting away with it while others are penalized? Do you believe in equal justice for all? Shouldn’t people holding jobs here illegally be replaced with those people waiting in lines to come here legally? And how do you know which were brought here, at what age, and who came to America at a young age of their own free will? You simply love weighted scales.
Piling bullshit upon bullshit does not make you right, georgy. Try reading the 4th post up from the bottom of page 1 of this thread again without twisting words around like the phony propagandist that you are. Rather have your friend read it to you over and over again until you gain understanding as to what was written. You obviously do not comprehend it at this time or you would not have posted what you posted. Try really really really hard to gain some understanding of even a small portion of what was written.
What did you teach in your little Sunday School Class, Pharisee? That sin is OK if you make up real good excuses for it? Did you teach that breaking the law should be rewarded? Did you teach that God shows partiality if the excuse for disobedience is good enough? If the thief says he only robbed banks to feed his family should the judge let him go unpunished? Some liberal morons would do that, are you one of those? <(rhetorical)
You want touchy-feely justice for all, right? Throw him in prison, he’s UGLY! Let him go he’s so adorable. You can’t discern right from wrong. For that reason your judgement is corrupted. If you did discern right from wrong you would know that it is not proper to put the illegal alien before the law abiding foreigner who is patiently waiting to come to America legally. But you have no concept of fairness, do you. You sanction crowding to the head of the line through committing a criminal act against American citizens. But would you approve of some continually crowding to the head of the line in front of you when you are standing in line at the DMV? Surly you are not a hypocrite, are you, Pharisee?
These DOCA “kids” are between 20 and 30 years of age today. Before DACA they were not deported. After DACA they are not going to be deported. DACA simply is a liberal ploy to give them all the benefits of Americans (Welfare etc) and set them on the path to citizenship. Once they do that they can bring in millions upon millions of their relatives in through chain migration in order to cancel American citizen votes at the polls. Be assured they will vote for those who assisted in their lawlessness. The non-American is the new American. Politicians do not care what Americans want, they only serve those who are not Americans. DACA was only a means to that end.
Pharisee, didn’t you learn any scriptural principles whatsoever? Your pink squishy carnal feelings rule over your judgment. Have you not read that “The man from a strange land who is living among you will be lifted up higher and higher over you, while you go down lower and lower.” Chain migration, Pharisee, chain migration. That is a fulfillment of that prophecy for America. Are you feeling lesser and lesser yet? Are you going lower and lower while the illegal alien who resides among us is being raised higher and higher? Who does your representative truly represent? < (rhetorical)
