Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

Facebook Suppressing Pro-Gun Postings, Say Gun Rights Advocates

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... gun-posts/

by AWR Hawkins7 Jun 20160
7 Jun, 2016 7 Jun, 2016

A group of companies and gun-rights advocates say Facebook is actively suppressing their posts, thereby diminishing their visibility in Americans’ social media networks.
..................................................................................................................

Facebook Deletes Hundreds of Pro Gun Pages Without Notice

http://controversialtimes.com/issues/co ... ut-notice/

What started as scattered reports of pro-gun Facebook groups being shut down quickly turned into a cacophony of complaints yesterday as the social media giant took a first step against supporters of the Second Amendment.

.....................................................................................................................
Facebook censors pro-Trump and negative Hillary news

For reasons that only a hard core Hillary sycophant could understand, the mere posting or sharing of online reports on the 2016 Election Race is now blocked.

https://www.intellihub.com/facebook-cen ... lary-news/

....................................................................................................................

Report: Facebook Suppresses Conservative Outlets, Amplifies ‘Black Lives Matter’

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/05/0 ... es-matter/
Anonymous sources at Facebook’s news team have confirmed to Gizmodo that, in addition to suppressing conservative news sources, the company suppresses stories about itself while artificially promoting stories about the Black Lives Matter movement.

BS on the lot of 'em. I see the pro-gun posts. I see the pro-Trump and anti-Clinton posts.

That was a very good post from you Mike... Meaningless.

angelsshotgun wrote:That was a very good post from you Mike... Meaningless.

Meangingless? No, just stating that the subject line is wrong and neocon websites are spreading their usual lies. I saw pro-Trump and anti-Clinton posts this morning. Pro-guns posts last night.

"BS on the lot of 'em. I see the pro-gun posts. I see the pro-Trump and anti-Clinton posts."

"I saw pro-Trump and anti-Clinton posts this morning. Pro-guns posts last night."


Then I take it that you found those the deleted posts the articles were addressing? Can you tell us what the posts that were and are being deleted have to say? Curious minds want to know.

I couldn't find any posts that were previously deleted either.

No one said that they were ALL were deleted. The reports say that quite a few people are posting that their posts are being deleted and some former Facebook employees are verifying that some posts that don't tow the propaganda line are being deleted. Were you looking for a complete Internet sweep? Be patient, that will happen soon enough.

they SAY their posts were deleted - so make them prove it, why should I have to unprove it?

"they SAY their posts were deleted - so make them prove it, why should I have to unprove it?"

Better than that, why did you even bother to make your irrelevant comment? Didn't you realize that "deleted" means that they are no longer there? Guess not as you went looking for them.

I really don't believe they are stupid enough to go searching for their deleted posts. Somewhere down the line they probably learned what "deleted" meant.

So far I only know of one person brilliant enough to go searching for posts that have been deemed deleted.

No, they can prove their posts are being deleted by doing a screenprint when they first post them, then another one of their FB profile page (the only place all your posts will show at one time) when they are deleted. But they won't, because its so much bullsh!t.

No one searched for the deleted posts - where the f*ck are you getting that?

My replies are hardly irrelevant - they are calling out the fact that the whole brietbart site is foolish lying drivel.

roll it up and snort it wrote,
"don't worry clint is here that mark dude is wrong. That's all I can at the moment. he not be wanting to ban guns A viable part of any business."

HUH?

GuitarMikeB wrote:

angelsshotgun wrote:That was a very good post from you Mike... Meaningless.

Meangingless? No, just stating that the subject line is wrong and neocon websites are spreading their usual lies. I saw pro-Trump and anti-Clinton posts this morning. Pro-guns posts last night.

So why didn't you just censor the fuuuck out of all of them?

Neocon, facist, national socialists, black, white... Why everything has to be labeled is out of control.

HERE... If it's a gun, It's a gun. If it is bubble gum, it is still bubble gum. Don't know why anyone puts up with this sort of labeling... The next step is censorship and we all know how fuuuking GOOD at that you are MIKE BIRCH!!!!

Anyone want to resupply Montana? Rip snort is replying in almost coherent sentences. Even the spelling is getting better.

"Anyone want to resupply Montana? Rip snort is replying in almost coherent sentences. Even the spelling is getting better"

Most probably just typos.