Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

Posted: **Fri May 06, 2016 3:49 pm**

Remember when House Speaker Paul Ryan said that if controversial candidate Donald Trump wins the Republican presidential nomination, he will support him?
"Yes, I will. I'll support whoever our nominee is," Ryan told TODAY's Matt Lauer on Wednesday.

But that was then. Today is a new day .

Paul Nehlen: ‘Paul Ryan’s Elitism is Showing,’ ‘His Disdain and Disrespect for the American Electorate Is Breathtaking’.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... athtaking/

Gee, I know.

Nobody expected something like that to happen from self serving entrenched elitist Paul Rino.

Posted: **Fri May 06, 2016 6:01 pm**

That sorry POS rolled as soon as he became House Speaker! I don't give a damn what he thinks. Problem is some of the brain dead may follow his lead!
I have to have more faith in conservatives than to believe that WE won't rally behind Trump now that he is going to be the candidate! I wanted Cruz but with that said Trump will be better than the alternative.

Posted: **Fri May 06, 2016 8:31 pm**

The electoral system leaves a lot to be desired.

Much better to be 'party-oriented' than to make a decision on what you believe in? Not ok to change your mind? Isn't this a free country where one can choose for oneself? :wink:

Posted: **Fri May 06, 2016 8:33 pm**

Trump will be better than the alternative.

We really don't know that yet. We have a guy that can change his position 5 times in an hour and everything has to be negotiated or re-negotiated, according to him.

I can remember thinking that Hillary would have been better than the one we got stuck with last time. I don't see how Trump could be worse than either of them...but we really just don't know how his impulsive temperament will play out in the arena of International diplomacy, or how his impetulent insults of others will affect world markets.

Noting how well he treated anyone who had a disagreement with him, my guess is that he will, or at least might, start writing executive orders anytime he wants to "make America great again". (according to his whim at the moment). Can't imagine us not being in a war within the first 6 months of his administration. I do think he'd wage it better than Hillary.

I don't see how any politician in his right mind can afford to to be hitched to that wagon until it gets out of the station. No matter what you might think....we really have no idea what's going to happen with the Trump crap-shoot but it looks like someone is throwing snake-eyes.

.

Posted: **Fri May 06, 2016 8:40 pm**

GuitarMikeB wrote:The electoral system leaves a lot to be desired.

Much better to be 'party-oriented' than to make a decision on what you believe in? Not ok to change your mind? Isn't this a free country where one can choose for oneself?

you are free to choose a firing squad or a hanging

.

Posted: **Sat May 07, 2016 3:21 pm**

" Much better to be 'party-oriented' than to make a decision on what you believe in? Not ok to change your mind? Isn't this a free country where one can choose for oneself? "

True.
However Trump made an agreement with the GOP not to run as a third party candidate and in turn the GOP promised to support whomever the voters chose for a candidate. Now the RINO establishment is squirming because they never believed he would get this far. Will trump go third party if they sabotage him ? (even more than they already have) Time will tell. The GOP RINO entrenched would rather have hillary win in order to maintain their power for that is all that matters to them. Traitors such as McCain, Jeb Bush, Lindsey Graham, Paul RINO, and other lying constitutional citizen hating traitors to our Republic who are banding together like the scum that floats to the top of a human waste stabilization pond. No offense intended McCain, .Jeb Bush, Lindsey Graham, Paul RINO, and other traitors to our Republic.

I don't care if you hate trump. Personally I believe he is a very bad choice. However those defending the GOP RINOS should remember that the nomination, either for good or for bad, is the will of the people that voted for him tand that is what matters. If the tables were turned I am sure your outlook would be quite different. Take that away and you give up your choice for all time.

The world does not understand this but those who belong to God should understand. Men do not appoint anyone to office, only God creates an office and then only God appoints someone to fill that office for his purpose. It was God who gave us obama in order to bring down America, for God is the author of both the blessing and the curse and he sends either to a nation as he sees fit. If you believe in the God of Israel, you know that is truth, for he has declared it through his word.

But already the GOP is again actively attempting to renounce the choice of the voter, go against what they pledged, and show even the most gullible who they truly are and that is a government against the people. The entrenched little RINO monarchs are hoping that America's representative democracy, their government of themselves, by themselves, for themselves, shall not perish....................

Posted: **Sat May 07, 2016 9:49 pm**

Mike

Paul Ryan? Believes in something? Please, dude. He believes in Paul Ryan and his allegiance to his masters in the uniparty, nothing else, and certainly not America.

He is white trash dressed in a flashy suit and any other period in our history he'd be standing outside his trailer with a Budweiser in his hand, shouting imprecations at an unforgiving sky, wondering why he'd been shortchanged...

Not that I don't respect his many achievements...oh wait - he doesn't have any.

Talbot

Posted: **Tue May 31, 2016 2:55 am**

amen Mike..

Posted: **Tue May 31, 2016 12:37 pm**

yod wrote:
Trump will be better than the alternative.

We really don't know that yet. We have a guy that can change his position 5 times in an hour and everything has to be negotiated or re-negotiated, according to him.

I can remember thinking that Hillary would have been better than the one we got stuck with last time. I don't see how Trump could be worse than either of them...but we really just don't know how his impulsive temperament will play out in the arena of International diplomacy, or how his impetulent insults of others will affect world markets.

Noting how well he treated anyone who had a disagreement with him, my guess is that he will, or at least might, start writing executive orders anytime he wants to "make America great again". (according to his whim at the moment). Can't imagine us not being in a war within the first 6 months of his administration. I do think he'd wage it better than Hillary.

I don't see how any politician in his right mind can afford to to be hitched to that wagon until it gets out of the station. No matter what you might think....we really have no idea what's going to happen with the Trump crap-shoot but it looks like someone is throwing snake-eyes.

.

News Bulletin We are at war now and have been for several years. American soldiers are dying everyday in the WAR WE STILL ARE IN

Posted: **Tue May 31, 2016 2:11 pm**

RGMixProject wrote:News Bulletin We are at war now and have been for several years. American soldiers are dying everyday in the WAR WE STILL ARE IN

News Flash: Not really. We mostly pulled out of Iraq, we have limited engagement in Syria, not confronting Russia in the Baltic States, China is flexing muscles, and we're officially defending Iran per the terms of Obama's recent deal.

Excuse me for not elaborating that for ya. I mean a new world war.

Hillary would just continue the slow drip we have, whereas I think Trump will start a few new ones, and will be easily manipulated by the hawks in the State Dept.

On the flip side, I think he would at least try to win, instead of milking it for years like a Democrat would do.

Posted: **Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:28 am**

yod wrote:
RGMixProject wrote:News Bulletin We are at war now and have been for several years. American soldiers are dying everyday in the WAR WE STILL ARE IN

News Flash: Not really. We mostly pulled out of Iraq, we have limited engagement in Syria, not confronting Russia in the Baltic States, China is flexing muscles, and we're officially defending Iran per the terms of Obama's recent deal.

Excuse me for not elaborating that for ya. I mean a new world war.

Hillary would just continue the slow drip we have, whereas I think Trump will start a few new ones, and will be easily manipulated by the hawks in the State Dept.

On the flip side, I think he would at least try to win, instead of milking it for years like a Democrat would do.

I feel YOUR news flash sucks to even think to dumb down the WAR WE ARE STILL IN AND HAS NOT STOPED!!!!

—2,499 U.S. soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq so far under President Obama.

—Of those, 1,906 have been killed in and around Afghanistan, and 593 in Iraq.

—Under Obama, the United States has been at war for 2,687 days. That’s longer than under George W. Bush — or any other U.S. president, for that matter.

—Obama has conducted airstrikes on seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and Syria. (That’s three more countries than George W. Bush bombed.)

—U.S. combat forces are deployed on the ground in three countries: Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. That’s one more war than Obama inherited, and which his successor will likely have to contend with.

THE WAR IS STILL ON AND AMERICAN SOLDIERS ARE BEING KILLED BECAUSE OF THE WAR WE ARE STILL IN!!!!!!!!!!!

The Department of Defense announced today the death of a sailor who was supporting Operation Inherent Resolve.

Gunner’s Mate Seaman Connor Alan McQuagge, 19, of Utah, died May 26

Posted: **Wed Jun 01, 2016 1:47 pm**

and yet....

We mostly pulled out of Iraq, we have limited engagement in Syria, not confronting Russia in the Baltic States, China is flexing muscles, and we're officially defending Iran per the terms of Obama's recent deal.

America has not really seen war like what is coming....

.

Posted: **Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:24 pm**

RG

"We are at war?"

I'm not. The beast govt is using highly motivated young soldiers to fight what we used to call 'cabinet wars.' They tell these kids to go off and fight for our freedoms - and then we line up to thank them for their service like a bunch of lames. Freedom? I vaguely remember it...

The only threat to our freedoms has come and like the freedoms, is gone. And it was no external threat - our own leaders destroyed freedom in this country. I'll thank no one for fighting for that scum.

Do I like soldiers? Sure but for reasons other than cliches. I just like men who like to fight. Men like me. I could really come to appreciate men like that actually protecting this country, guarding our borders perhaps? Defense of the country, old fashioned ideas like that.

I don't support their stupid wars for Saudi Arabia. Fortunately the better quality troops seem to be getting out in droves - America is at risk all right. But not from a bunch a rag headed idiots with IQs of 70.

Saudi Arabia Delenda Est

Talbot

Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again

Re: Screw the American Voter ..... Paul Rino Strikes Again