Musician Forum - Band Discussion Board - BandMix

RUI Musik wrote:Why would an autopsy be necessary? The man was 79 years old and in poor health. Unless there is some evidence of foul play or some request from the family no autopsy would be done.

Jimmy, this is the beginning of the conspiracy theory circulating on fb.

RUI Musik wrote:Why would an autopsy be necessary? The man was 79 years old and in poor health. Unless there is some evidence of foul play or some request from the family no autopsy would be done.

Who told you he was in poor health?

He had no preexisting condition and was in perfect health, as far as anyone knew. There are older people on the SCOTUS.

He was alone and away from home, found dead with a pillow over his face. The speed at which this was labeled "natural causes" under those circumstances is reason enough for suspicion, imo.

Considering all the ugly comments from liberals on the internet today, there were plenty of people who wanted him dead. Especially when you consider the magnitude of cases he was about to rule on; including O's use of executive action and abortion requirements in Texas, any homicide police investigator will tell you that an autopsy is standard procedure here.

"As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia," William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police, wrote in a post on Facebook on Sunday.

The manager of the El Paso funeral home that handled Scalia's body said Scalia's family insisted against an autopsy. But the decision has spawned a host of conspiracy theories online, as well as skeptical questions from law enforcement experts such as Ritchie.

"You have a Supreme Court Justice who died, not in attendance of a physician," he wrote. "You have a non-homicide trained US Marshal tell the justice of peace that no foul play was observed. You have a justice of the peace pronounce death while not being on the scene and without any medical training opining that the justice died of a heart attack. What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction? Why not a cerebral hemorrhage?"

Ritchie also raised questions about the marshals' actions. "How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack? Did the US Marshal check for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation? Did the US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning? My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas."



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... id=ss_mail

no, it was suffocation by a pillow, not poison, Ted.. vamp's news source verified it.. you bet.. gotta bridge to sell you by the way..

i wonder..does ruthie g have an alibi?????

I didn't say anything about poison?



Oh c'mon guys, don't be hypocritical. If it was Obama found alone in a room and dead with a pillow on his head, you'd all be screaming otherwise and apoplectic about it.

the owner of the luxury hunting lodge was a high up Democratic politician.. what is a devout Republican U.S. Supreme Court Judge mingling with a democrat in the 1 st place? something does not add up.. that and his friendship with Ginsburg? I smell a scandal myself

Dayne Nobody IV wrote:the owner of the luxury hunting lodge was a high up Democratic politician.. what is a devout Republican U.S. Supreme Court Judge mingling with a democrat in the 1 st place? something does not add up.. that and his friendship with Ginsburg? I smell a scandal myself

Judge Ginsberg enjoyed a good intellectual challenge and there was none finer than Scalia.

There are several things about this that just don't add up. Any one of them is good reason for an autopsy.



.