Been checking out some of the videos posted by Pieczenik, not sure what to think.
On the one hand, he could be bat sh*t crazy.
On the other hand, how many plots to kill Castro did the CIA hatch in the 60's? How many foreign spies have been caught, and more importantly, how many have not? JFK was thought to have dated one.
And look at what's happening. A week ago I would have sworn (and did) that FBI director Comey was seriously compromised. I still don't trust him. Now he's suddenly done an about face and jump started the Clinton investigation again. The common idea is that too many FBI rank and file were piling up resignations on his desk.
Then Obama turns against Comey, after singing his praises ever since he decided to let Hillary off the hook. Some of the supposedly die hard never Trump republicans suddenly decide maybe Trump is OK. Cruz is supposed to be out campaigning with Pence today.
Something is afoot, and what we see is only the tip of the iceberg. Too much happening to really wrap my head around, but a silent coup doesn't sound all that far fetched to me. It's obvious nobody in the current administration is going to seriously go after Hillary, all of them are Obama appointees and have already proven they have no intention of impeding her progress as she slimes her way into the White House. The IRS, DOJ and FBI have all been politicized. IRS went after conservative political groups, DOJ under Holder didn't file any charges. Lynch was not supposed to be caught meeting with Bill Clinton, if an alert reporter hadn't spotted that meeting, things would have gone according to plan and Hillary would have been quietly let off the hook. When that didn't work, Lynch still didn't do a t hing to stop Hillary, even though Comey laid out a practically slam dunk case for at least gross negligence. Lynch did nothing. Nobody else in the Obama admin will either.
The original FBI investigation was sloppy to say the least. Nothing recorded, Hillary not even sworn in, "interviewed" at her house on a Saturday, rather than seriously questioned at FBI hq as in a normal case, no recording made, no notes even taken, the agents who questioned her wrote up their basic take on it from memory. A couple of days later they have a final decision. No follow up questions in most of the "interviews". Some important questions ignored altogether. And how did they miss the laptop finally found at Weiner's house?
Anyway I digress...
Something is going on and it seems to me an intervention by individuals in the intelligence community would make sense. Who else has enough dirt on all parties concerned to really get their attention? Did Hillary really screw up and threaten Comey? She's probably dumb enough. She thinks she is above the law and probably didn't stop to think just how Comey has been making his living the past few years...the guy probably has his coffee cup checked for bugs every 20 minutes. He's been up to his eyeballs in the highest level of the spying game for years, state secrets are his bread and butter. So if Hillary thought she would throw him under the bus, it could be that he simply called up a friend or two and got the ball rolling. No need to say anything overt, "meet me at the donut shop" would do it.
Pieczenik knows the people to do it, he's been in that circle for 40 years. There are plenty people in the alphabet agencies who are honest, believe in this country and I don't have much trouble believing they would band together to stop what they know is the greatest danger to this country in 100 years. The latest story is they are 99% sure at least 5 foreign agencies probably gained access to Hillary's server. That means she is the biggest target for international blackmail in our lifetimes. She's also a pathological liar, incompetent, so incredibly corrupt it's mind boggling, and would be so easily controlled by a number of hostile agents. It's very possible some of our intelligence people who actually are on the right side decided it was best to stop her before it was too late. They have her number, as Pieczenik said. And a lot of other people too.
It could be done without a lot of fanfare, and the internet would be a good medium for contact. Wikileaks has already done a lot of damage. The FBI also released a lot of documents the past few days. a few emails or better yet Snapchat messages - remember Hillary saying those messages disappear all by themselves? - they could notify the target individuals without leaving a huge digital trail. Email would leave a trail but snap chat might not. And who says actual contact would be necessary? Dump a few documents, they will get the hint. Comey walks by in the hall and simply says watch it. Or someone else...it really wouldn't be that hard to do, once you have the information in your hands to bring them down, and I'm willing to bet the FBI, CIA and NSA all have it. And they know how to communicate on the sly. Chances are also very good that those agencies also have some very serious individuals in their ranks who are sick of the corruption and can see it's time to stop it.
Nobody in Obama's administration is even slightly interested in doing their job, it's literally the most corrupt administration in history. Trump has gained the popularity he has because the public is beginning to see just how bad it is. He's been attacked by Democrats, Republicans and the press from day one because he's been saying from day one he intends to clean house, stating in public - which nobody else has ever done - that the politicians in charge are incompetent and corrupt, and it needs to be stopped. And he's already made a lot of progress. The NYT just reported a 95% drop in profits for this year. They are also one of the papers that have been publishing the most dishonest attacks against Trump. Coincidence? I don't think so. People are waking up.
Lawsuits are being filed, Lynch just got notified. FBI is seriously investigation the Clinton Foundation, Weiner is supposedly in rehab but some rumors are floating around that he's actually in witness protection, Huma is toast, and several upper echelon government stuffed suits are implicated. Once Hillary goes down, she takes down several with her...Obama, Lynch, Podesta, just to get started. But how? As we already know, the DOJ won't. So the intelligence community steps in.
It may be another distraction. This time I get the feeling it's not, it's serious now. People who have the goods on the Clintons have finally played their hand. So far, she's looking at several charges...perjury, obstruction of justice, mishandling of classified information, and most importantly, RICO charges. Just the gross negligence, all but proven, means she is not qualified to ever hold public office again. That's part of the statute.
And why wouldn't we believe it? It's not hard for a lot of people to be convinced politicians are all liars and corrupt, it's not hard for most conservatives to believe George Soros is actually the puppet master while Obama and Hillary are the puppets, so why is it so hard to believe the intelligence community is willing to step in and do something to stop Hillary? How many people believe Oswald was not the only shooter in the JFK assassination, he was only part of a well hidden conspiracy? How many people believe the CIA was involved in at least a half dozen plots to kill Castro, when we have very little solid evidence?
And how many times have we seen governments overthrown all over the world for hundreds of years? Wasn't Caesar killed by his own political buddies? Recent research has brought out info indicating at least a half dozen plots to kill Hitler failed. Is it so far fetched to think that a silent coup would be pulled off to take our government back from a group of incredibly corrupt criminals?
It may be a crock, but I think it has a good chance of being true.
I'm a member of the BOMB SQUAD.
If you see me running, better catch up!
http://billy-griffis-jr.artistwebsites.com/