This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

General discussion for non music topics. BE RESPECTFUL OR YOUR POSTS WILL BE DELETED.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#295076 by Badstrat
Fri Nov 29, 2019 5:10 pm
How Long Before Climate Change Causes Our Total Extinction? Presidential Candidates claim 12 years.

Previous warnings about the extinction of man due to climate change span many decades with none of them coming to fruition. However climate change is the prefect platform for the world dominance and total control of man by the few power hungry elite. And that is coming to fruition. Politicians want world domination of all mankind for that is the nature of the politician.

Why does PRAVDA cry climate change every time we have a few hot days or a period of extreme cold weather? They even concoct new names for normal weather conditions such as "Flash Drought" or "Polar Vortex" in order to make you believe that these weather conditions have not happened previously. That is all simply propaganda to feed the gullible. The earth has been far colder and far hotter before factories and fossil fuels were ever utilized by man, or even before man was documented to have been on this planet.

Other planets in our solar system also heat and cool periodically, yet the sun is omitted in climate change equations. Will climate change also destroy them and disrupt the gravitational order of our solar system? Will that annihilate us all if we don't act immediately? Should the man made pollution on other planets also be limited by earths brilliant politicians? Ridiculous,right? So is climate change.

There is evidence of the whole world being under water at one time. Is that also proof of climate change? Why not? Would that never have happened if "something" had not caused pollution? Have you ever considered that these climate change politicians are the buffoons who used to live next to you and couldn't hold a job on the outsidgovernment so they got government jobs? Lies flow from their mouths like waters from great rivers. When they speak they reveal themselves as complete idiots. If climate change is so devastating then why have they done nothing but attack Donald Trump for 3 years? Is that more important than saving the planet? And why did obama purchase waterfront property worth millions if he knows it will be under water in a few years? Go figure. Their actions betray their words.

As a Christian I believe the Bible to be the Word of the God of creation. I also believe that between Genesis 1&2 there was a flood that covered the earth. I have good reason to believe that but it would require more than needed to explain it. I also believe in the flood in the days of Noah. That was caused by man and his rejection of the God of creation. Enough of that. The point being that the earth has been plagued with both rising and receding waters since the beginning of time. Some scientists now believe that the earth was not a hot ball of matter, but rather a frozen one in the beginning. Now that was climate change.
..............
Predictions and warning about the extinction of man due to climate change (Present presidential candidates predictions not included)

10 times 'experts' predicted the world would end by now
https://www.foxnews.com/science/10-time ... end-by-now

18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/18-spect ... is-year-3/

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-yea ... redictions

Climate Change Fraud Exposed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 455KEDitpU
..............

One of the most stupid terms attributed to climate change is a "Flash Drought". How can a drought be categorized as "Flash" since drought only happens over time? Flash Drought is just another government oxymoron. Are authorities who can't predict weather accurately day to day actually saying this drought happened faster than they expected? And what is a "Polar Vortex" supposedly attributed to climate change? Neither are anything new. The earth has had periods of extreme cold and extreme heat since it existed. One of the coldest temperature recorded in the contiguous U.S. is 70 degrees below zero, measured at Rogers Pass, Montana, on Jan. 20, 1954. The term “polar vortex” was popularized in 2014 when a particularly brutal January cold snap sent the country into a deep freeze. Babbitt, Minnesota, reached a low of -37°. The low of 4° in New York City broke a 118-year record. So it has happened before. It isn't close to the -70 degrees of Jan. 20, 1954 is it? But the "Polar Vortex" of 2014 was attributed to climate change, whereas the -70 in 1954 wasn't attributed to climate change. The “Great Arctic Outbreak” of February 1899 set temperature and snowfall records from Michigan to Florida that still stand today. Say what? 1899 Record still stands today? They didn't even consider that a "polar Vortex due to climate change."

Through the years seasons get either warmer or colder all the time. The four hottest years on record have come in the decade of the 2010s. Of the 10 hottest years on record, only two came before 1998 (1934,1921). 2014 was globe's warmest year on record say NASA, NOAA. It was also one of the coldest years. So how does man cause both records in the same year? Naturally I believe the climate change folks have expunged most of the data that decries climate change from the internet, just as they are presently expunging records of their corruption and history. Older data is getting scarce. The ice caps are melting! But new ones are also forming. Polar bears are becoming extinct! Nope they are increasing in number. Remember those flash headline news stories from PRAVDA? By the way,have you heard about the increasing Arctic ice?
..............

https://www.baltimoresun.com/weather/ba ... story.html
Despite the "polar vortex" that made news across much of the United States in 2014, last year was the warmest on Earth since record-keeping began in 1880, according to two reports released Friday.

Flash drought engulfs the U.S. Southeast in September 2019
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/e ... ember-2019

Early Earth was covered in a global ocean and had no mountains
https://www.newscientist.com/article/21 ... mountains/

Deep Bore Into Antarctica Finds Freezing Ice, Not Melting as Expected
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news ... -freezing/

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/na ... han-losses

Polar Bear numbers reach new highs – Population increases to the highest levels in decades
https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/03/05 ... n-decades/

As Polar Bear Numbers Increase, GWPF Calls For Re-assessment Of Endangered Species Status
https://www.thegwpf.org/as-polar-bear-n ... es-status/

Early Earth may have been ice cold
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 144620.htm

My opinion is that climate change will eventually cause the total extinction of FREE men soon after most free men are FORCED to believe in it.

* PRAVDA (America government controlled news propaganda media)
#295078 by Badstrat
Fri Nov 29, 2019 7:23 pm
Mordgeld wrote:These government employee buffoons you speak of, are these the folks making half again more than you?
Image


So you actually believe the amount of money a person makes is equal to the intelligence of that person? WOW!! Such simplicity and clarity in your deduction. I find your reply truly thoughtful and quite brilliant.

You obviously believe that the wage graph above reflects the intelligence of the government employee through his paycheck. And the corruption and graft of government unions robbing the American citizen at the bargaining table to pay those higher wages has nothing to do with it.

Government unions do not barter with their employer, the American taxpayer. Instead crooked union leaders bargain with corrupt politicians and leave the real employers of the government worker out of the bargaining process. It is a long standing agreement between union leaders and crooked politicians that politicians give the unions the money they demand, and the unions pay the politician kickbacks for his re election campaign. A government worker can walk off his job and demand higher wages, while a private sector worker can not. He will be fired if he walks off his job. Whenever a private sector workers is found to be incompetent he or she gets fired. While on the other hand Government unions make it almost impossible to fire incompetent government employees. For that reason the government is full of incompetent idiots at every level.

Does that help?

(Government worker= oxymoron Postal worker =oxymorons.)
#295089 by Gulag McStradinsky
Sun Dec 01, 2019 8:23 pm
Badstrat wrote:How Long Before Climate Change Causes Our Total Extinction? Presidential Candidates claim 12 years.

Previous warnings about the extinction of man due to climate change span many decades with none of them coming to fruition. However climate change is the prefect platform for the world dominance and total control of man by the few power hungry elite. And that is coming to fruition. Politicians want world domination of all mankind for that is the nature of the politician.

Why does PRAVDA cry climate change every time we have a few hot days or a period of extreme cold weather? They even concoct new names for normal weather conditions such as "Flash Drought" or "Polar Vortex" in order to make you believe that these weather conditions have not happened previously. That is all simply propaganda to feed the gullible. The earth has been far colder and far hotter before factories and fossil fuels were ever utilized by man, or even before man was documented to have been on this planet.

Other planets in our solar system also heat and cool periodically, yet the sun is omitted in climate change equations. Will climate change also destroy them and disrupt the gravitational order of our solar system? Will that annihilate us all if we don't act immediately? Should the man made pollution on other planets also be limited by earths brilliant politicians? Ridiculous,right? So is climate change.

There is evidence of the whole world being under water at one time. Is that also proof of climate change? Why not? Would that never have happened if "something" had not caused pollution? Have you ever considered that these climate change politicians are the buffoons who used to live next to you and couldn't hold a job on the outsidgovernment so they got government jobs? Lies flow from their mouths like waters from great rivers. When they speak they reveal themselves as complete idiots. If climate change is so devastating then why have they done nothing but attack Donald Trump for 3 years? Is that more important than saving the planet? And why did obama purchase waterfront property worth millions if he knows it will be under water in a few years? Go figure. Their actions betray their words.

As a Christian I believe the Bible to be the Word of the God of creation. I also believe that between Genesis 1&2 there was a flood that covered the earth. I have good reason to believe that but it would require more than needed to explain it. I also believe in the flood in the days of Noah. That was caused by man and his rejection of the God of creation. Enough of that. The point being that the earth has been plagued with both rising and receding waters since the beginning of time. Some scientists now believe that the earth was not a hot ball of matter, but rather a frozen one in the beginning. Now that was climate change.
..............
Predictions and warning about the extinction of man due to climate change (Present presidential candidates predictions not included)

10 times 'experts' predicted the world would end by now
https://www.foxnews.com/science/10-time ... end-by-now

18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/18-spect ... is-year-3/

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-yea ... redictions

Climate Change Fraud Exposed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 455KEDitpU
..............

One of the most stupid terms attributed to climate change is a "Flash Drought". How can a drought be categorized as "Flash" since drought only happens over time? Flash Drought is just another government oxymoron. Are authorities who can't predict weather accurately day to day actually saying this drought happened faster than they expected? And what is a "Polar Vortex" supposedly attributed to climate change? Neither are anything new. The earth has had periods of extreme cold and extreme heat since it existed. One of the coldest temperature recorded in the contiguous U.S. is 70 degrees below zero, measured at Rogers Pass, Montana, on Jan. 20, 1954. The term “polar vortex” was popularized in 2014 when a particularly brutal January cold snap sent the country into a deep freeze. Babbitt, Minnesota, reached a low of -37°. The low of 4° in New York City broke a 118-year record. So it has happened before. It isn't close to the -70 degrees of Jan. 20, 1954 is it? But the "Polar Vortex" of 2014 was attributed to climate change, whereas the -70 in 1954 wasn't attributed to climate change. The “Great Arctic Outbreak” of February 1899 set temperature and snowfall records from Michigan to Florida that still stand today. Say what? 1899 Record still stands today? They didn't even consider that a "polar Vortex due to climate change."

Through the years seasons get either warmer or colder all the time. The four hottest years on record have come in the decade of the 2010s. Of the 10 hottest years on record, only two came before 1998 (1934,1921). 2014 was globe's warmest year on record say NASA, NOAA. It was also one of the coldest years. So how does man cause both records in the same year? Naturally I believe the climate change folks have expunged most of the data that decries climate change from the internet, just as they are presently expunging records of their corruption and history. Older data is getting scarce. The ice caps are melting! But new ones are also forming. Polar bears are becoming extinct! Nope they are increasing in number. Remember those flash headline news stories from PRAVDA? By the way,have you heard about the increasing Arctic ice?
..............

https://www.baltimoresun.com/weather/ba ... story.html
Despite the "polar vortex" that made news across much of the United States in 2014, last year was the warmest on Earth since record-keeping began in 1880, according to two reports released Friday.

Flash drought engulfs the U.S. Southeast in September 2019
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/e ... ember-2019

Early Earth was covered in a global ocean and had no mountains
https://www.newscientist.com/article/21 ... mountains/

Deep Bore Into Antarctica Finds Freezing Ice, Not Melting as Expected
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news ... -freezing/

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/na ... han-losses

Polar Bear numbers reach new highs – Population increases to the highest levels in decades
https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/03/05 ... n-decades/

As Polar Bear Numbers Increase, GWPF Calls For Re-assessment Of Endangered Species Status
https://www.thegwpf.org/as-polar-bear-n ... es-status/

Early Earth may have been ice cold
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 144620.htm

My opinion is that climate change will eventually cause the total extinction of FREE men soon after most free men are FORCED to believe in it.

* PRAVDA (America government controlled news propaganda media)

Image
#295091 by Gulag McStradinsky
Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:13 pm
Mordgeld wrote:These government employee buffoons you speak of, are these the folks making half again more than you?
Image

LSE Research: Washington's Revolving Door
https://youtu.be/2XLuaebpdAA

"Lobbying is big business in US politics, and getting bigger. Many commentators have voiced suspicions about the ties between lobbying firms, private sector businesses, and politics. They allege that a "revolving door," which sees employees moving from public office to private companies and back again, potentially jeopardises the public interest. Often highly paid, these lobbyists claim their salaries simply reflect their high ability, but critics complain those exiting the revolving door are attractive to lobbying firms because they can exploit their political connections. In this film Mirko Draca explains how he and his colleagues, Christian Fons-Rosen and Jordi Blanes i Vidal, measured the extent to which former political staff who become lobbyists benefit from their ties to government. This involves separating the issue of ability from the issue of political connections. Fortunately, the political system contains conditions for testing this: periodic elections mean that political contacts are vulnerable. By looking at what happens to a lobbyist's earnings when their former employer leaves political office, Draca and his colleagues have been able to measure the value of being politically well connected. "

Strategic Maneuvers - The Revolving Door from the Pentagon to the Private Sector
https://youtu.be/jv4CQJuANYM
"..... revealing the extent of the Pentagon's revolving door phenomenon, in which retired high-ranking generals and admirals cash in on their years of military experience by taking lucrative jobs with the defense industry. "
#295094 by Badstrat
Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:50 pm
Fools easily miss the point of an article and dwell on a word or a trivial statement not directly related to the main content of a post. Those lacking wisdom are easily distracted but the wise see through their purposeful diversions.
#295095 by Mordgeld
Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:30 pm
Badstrat wrote: So you actually believe the amount of money a person makes is equal to the intelligence of that person? WOW!! Such simplicity and clarity in your deduction. I find your reply truly thoughtful and quite brilliant.

You obviously believe that the wage graph above reflects the intelligence of the government employee through his paycheck. And the corruption and graft of government unions robbing the American citizen at the bargaining table to pay those higher wages has nothing to do with it.


Wrong and wrong.

I merely pointed out the money involved in this is the major factor. While quite unjust, this is currently the way the system works. The irony here is that in light of them and possibly their children being set for life and retiring far before you and I, it is a little difficult to fault their intelligence for getting on that gravy train.

Badstrat wrote:Fools easily miss the point of an article and dwell on a word or a trivial statement not directly related to the main content of a post. Those lacking wisdom are easily distracted but the wise see through their purposeful diversions.


Bestow on us all then, oh Lord, your infinite wisdom.

If the money (coming from our labors) behind these "fools" that should be our public servants is not addressed, who then ends up being the fools? It will end no better than Lysenkoism. There is no altruism present with such a high level of moral hazard for both employees and grantees in this scheme. Real or not, climate 'whatever disaster name' is bought and paid for as the twin millstones of taxation and inflation to grind us and their useful idiots down. Stealing our grist from the mouths of our children.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests