Page 1 of 2

Best US City for Small Bands?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:56 pm
by rhart1816
I am looking to relocate in the Spring just to try something new and am curious as to where would be good as a local musician. I always hear the obvious like Seattle or LA, etc. I am looking for a city that is less obvious so if your area is hot, post it here!

Thanks!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:59 pm
by BLUES and JAZZ SINGER
Believe it or not, PHILADELPHIA,PA is a great city to get onto something. The city and it's surrounding are filled with such diversity that no matter what your genre, you will find something. I know cause that's where I and many of my musician friends got their starts. And just look up Philadelphia musicians and actors etc. You will be amazed.
Hugs,
Rose

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:11 am
by GT Richards
Asheville, NC

Stay away from Kansas City

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:41 am
by fisherman bob
unless you plan on being in a covers only band. Later...

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:31 am
by Irminsul
I'm not so sure location is your issue. Maybe it's your approach.

Remember the old saying.."No matter where you go, there you are."

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:10 am
by TheJilted
who says that the best things right out in front of you at all times. Sometimes you find an alley bar that the best food and drinks you've ever had. You would never be able to find of course because of it's location. Be sure who you're getting is the best.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:18 am
by neanderpaul
Athens GA was fun, but talk about a tough crowd. I lived there in the early nineties. I was the singer for a guitar, bass, drums 4 piece. We got a review that called us Rush meets the Spin Doctors. I took that to mean your musicians are talented but wannabe and your singer is TOO pop.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:14 am
by Faultline 29
Madison, WI.............MAD CITY!!!!
tons of bands have come up in the lil triangle of madison and milwaukee and chicago..........

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:38 pm
by fatalattraction
hi

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:38 pm
by fatalattraction
Washingon, D.C

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:51 pm
by Tarnished2008
Depending on what kind of music you play.... The Tri Cities of Tenn is a good place to start.

Re: Best US City for Small Bands?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:18 am
by night_singer_guitarist
ksfhlkaj wrote:I am looking to relocate in the Spring just to try something new and am curious as to where would be good as a local musician. I always hear the obvious like Seattle or LA, etc. I am looking for a city that is less obvious so if your area is hot, post it here!

Thanks!


I would have to say that the twin Cities...(Minneapolis MN, really) are where it's at! I lived there for over a decade and there is no other place, bar none, that offers places to gig for all types of music! If you can make it through the winter, twin city people make up for it in the summer...believe me. There is a way strong venue for regae, hip hop, punk fusion, and truly original music. I wish that I still lived there...sigh

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:26 pm
by gbheil
Sure as hell aint East Texas !

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:51 pm
by philbymon
Don't bother with the Eastern Panhandle of WV, either...lots of good musicians, but nowhere to play & if you DO find a place they don't pay much at all.

Plus it's a veritable radio wasteland! The only new music we get to hear around here is (c)rap & modern scale-singing r&b. Very BOOOOOORING!

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:29 pm
by The_Copasetics
the heart of rock n roll is in Cleveland (at least that's what I'm told to believe)

but for real, lots of smaller venues to get started, a bar practically on every corner and many of them have music on weekends. I've gotten gigs before by walking into a bar with a demo and buying the owner a shot. a lot of the music clubs around here too like booking shows with as many bands as they can fit. Makes for some boring shows but gets you the exposure and experience.